Jump to content

Menu

What makes Tex-Mex inferior?


KungFuPanda
 Share

Recommended Posts

Help me out. I don’t live where I have access to “the best†or “real Mexican food.†(We do have a taco place that was on Diners, Drive Thrus, and Dives.) I’ve had countless conversations where person A mentions they like a restaurant and person B, dripping with disdain, will point out that it’s not REAL Mexican food, but Tex Mex.

 

From where I’m standing, the menus overlap so greatly and they all seem to be playing with the same ten ingredients. There’s a lot deliciousness there. I’ve lived in Texas. I’ve lived in California. I’ve visited friends in Arizona who have strong opinions about this. Is it completely subjective? Is there a key menu item that outs them as one or the other?

 

Help me out here. What’s the difference and should I pick a side?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's where I admit I spent the last few minutes googling the difference... lol. 

 

A couple sites suggested most all Mexican food north of the border is really Tex-Mex.  And that's probably true.  I think there are a few places around here that would be considered "real" Mexican food.  There is a difference between the two though. I wouldn't say it's better. Different, yes. Tex-Mex has just been influenced enough by Americans that it's not food you'd actually find being prepared in Mexico.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a definite difference, but if you can’t taste it, it probably doesn’t matter.

 

I don’t like tex-mex and will go without Mexican food rather than eat (what I consider to be) bad Mexican food.

 

Living in Louisiana and Florida were some hard times.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it has to do with the ingredients - Tex-Mex often uses flour tortillas, while "real Mexican food" would use corn. And it may use cumin, while the real stuff wouldn't, and cheddar cheese instead of local cheese, hard taco shells instead of soft, etc. I'm sure there are plenty of Americans who think that Tex-Mex is the food served alllll over Mexico, not even realizing that there are huge variances by location.

 

I think it is hilarious when I travel and see "American" food. Like when we went to Costa Rica, and my son orderered a "perro caliente" (hot dog) which was covered in mayo and salad. In our Belgian grocery store, I can buy a prepackaged "American" hot dog with a cakey bun and a slice of processed cheese. I can also buy "American" condiment sauce which I think is a mix of ketchup, mustard, mayo & pickles, but I'm not brave enough to try it. So I can see why people who have experience with food from Mexico comment on the difference and are amused when people think that Mexicans eat taco bowls.

 

Still, there's no reason for people to be rude about it. They should assume when Americans talk about going out to get Mexican food, they mean Tex-Mex unless they say otherwise.

 

 

  • Like 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tex-Mex uses a lot more beef and aged yellow (cheddar-type) cheeses, whereas Mex-Mex uses more chicken and pork and younger, white cheeses like cotija, asadero, queso fresco, etc. Tex-Mex tends to use the same set of spices for everything, and it includes a lot of cumin. 

 

New Mexican food is different from Tex-Mex but it's not really Mex-Mex either. New Mexican food uses a lot more green chile (and spells it with an e!), black beans, blue corn, cilantro, and lime. I think it actually has some similarities to Yucatan food. They use more authentic Mexican cheeses, too. (This assumes you're eating in a local restaurant, not a Chili's, although even Chili's will ask "red or green?" when you order.)

 

Is posole a thing in Tex-Mex? It's common in New Mexico. I think the NM State Dish is probably green chile stew, made with potatoes, tomatoes, onions, roasted green chiles, and a little beef.

Edited by Corraleno
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here I have to search more for authentic Tex Mex food. The local Mexican places have what seems to me to be very different food than what I have had at Tex Mex restaurants. There are often some regional differences in what is served based on where in Mexico the owners come from. I like both Tex Mex and Mexican foods but I don’t equate the two and they taste different to me.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard that disdain before.  Perhaps it is earned if Velveeta is the primary cheese and the meat is all ground beef.

 

Usually, people are being snobs when they say that, but sometimes I think they are reacting to a bad bastardization of the culture's food.  It's a sloppy cultural appropriation, in a way.

 

I LOVE tex-mex.  (I also love Pancho's from time to time.  Anybody been to Pancho's?  Spicy Velveeta sauce on white rice?  Sopapillas?  My pregnancy craving.  Nope, not Mexican food, but whatever.)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem comes when many Americans call Tex-Mex food (or Cali-Mex, or whatever regional variation in the US) Mexican food. I like Tex-Mex, but I do cringe when people call it Mexican as if it represents Mexican food when it only gives a tiny glimpse of what some food is like near the northern border or without trying to experience anything beyond that.

 

I’ve probably told this story here before, but an American friend of mine living in Guadalajara at the same time we were was making a meal for a group of Mexican teenagers. She decided to make tacos, but tacos like you’d expect north of the border. The Mexican teenagers saw the food and said she’d made American food. They liked it, but no one was under the impression it was Mexican food.

 

It’s very hard to find Mexican food outside Mexico and certain parts of the US, in spite of the fact that you can find “Mexican†restaurants in almost every country. They’re almost always Tex-Mex.

Edited by Amira
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have eaten lots of Tex-Mex in Texas and I have eaten lots of typical Mexican dishes in Mexico. I think the meals in Mexico are much more wholesome and varied. Chicken, Fish, Meat, etc.  The Tex-Mex I remember, often extremely delicious, is more what I think would be considered a "Snack" food in Mexico.  When I say Mexico, I am not referring to cities near the international border, I am referring to cities deep within Mexico, such as the City, Guadalajra, Cancun, etc.    I doubt that many people in cities like that would eat, for example, Tacos for Lunch or Dinner. More of a Snack.    Or, a plate of Enchiladas.  Tex-Mex is not bad. Tex-Mex is not typical of what is commonly eaten in Mexico. They can both be excellent and very enjoyable to eat. They are different.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flour tortillas are commonly used in Tex-Mex, while they are rare in most parts of Mexico--corn tortillas are lower in fat and calories and higher in fiber than flour.  Different regions of Mexico have different cuisines (depending on local ingredients); so areas of Mexico have a number of fish dishes--fish is rarely part of Tex-Mex.  Mexican cuisine will often include more fresh vegetables and fruits.  Tex-Mex tends to be based upon rice, refried beans, flour tortillas, (or fried corn tortillas), and inexpensive cuts of meat--often on ingredients which were relatively inexpensive 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem comes when many Americans call Tex-Mex food (or Cali-Mex, or whatever regional variation in the US) Mexican food. I like Tex-Mex, but I do cringe when people call it Mexican as if it represents Mexican food when it only gives a tiny glimpse of what some food is like near the northern border or without trying to experience anything beyond that.

 

I’ve probably told this story here before, but an American friend of mine living in Guadalajara at the same time we were was making a meal for a group of Mexican teenagers. She decided to make tacos, but tacos like you’d expect north of the border. The Mexican teenagers saw the food and said she’d made American food. They liked it, but no one was under the impression it was Mexican food.

 

It’s very hard to find Mexican food outside Mexico and certain parts of the US, in spite of the fact that you can find “Mexican†restaurants in almost every country. They’re almost always Tex-Mex.

 

To be fair this is done with lots and lots of other foods.  "I'm having Italian tonight."  or "I'm eating Greek food."  or "I ordered Chinese food for lunch."  Etc..etc..

  • Like 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flour tortillas are commonly used in Tex-Mex, while they are rare in most parts of Mexico--corn tortillas are lower in fat and calories and higher in fiber than flour.  Different regions of Mexico have different cuisines (depending on local ingredients); so areas of Mexico have a number of fish dishes--fish is rarely part of Tex-Mex.  Mexican cuisine will often include more fresh vegetables and fruits.  Tex-Mex tends to be based upon rice, refried beans, flour tortillas, (or fried corn tortillas), and inexpensive cuts of meat--often on ingredients which were relatively inexpensive 

 

It's weird too because I think (wheat) flour tortillas are gross.  The corn ones have so much more flavor!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair this is done with lots and lots of other foods. "I'm having Italian tonight." or "I'm eating Greek food." or "I ordered Chinese food for lunch." Etc..etc..

Definitely, and it goes both ways, like others mentioned above. There’s nothing I can do about it, but it just makes me sad to see any culture’s food reduced to something that doesn’t really represent it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I discuss it all as “Mexican†food and don’t differentiate. But in fairness, we live in a small town with two restaurants. The local Mexican restaurant is owned by a Mexican family and is called El Jalisco Mexican Restaurant. So if they don’t call it Tex Mex, it seems weird that I should. Unless the restaurant name specifies, I just refer to it as Mexican food.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in CA, and we have Taco Bell, Cal Mex, Tex Mex, and Mexican restaurants here.

 

I find Tex Mex to be more of a blast of flavor, a little OTT for me--hotter and lacking the complex flavor of Mexican food.  More one-dimensional.  But it's good.

 

Mexican is fantastic and more varied.  Cal Mex is great and creative riffing off of several cuisines.  Taco Bell is tasty fuel, vaguely related to Mexican food, kind of like 70s era casseroles are vaguely related to pastitio.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time I hear it met with disdain is when people confuse the two. 

 

When dh and I met he had only had a very limited experience with what he called Mexican food.  It was very jarring for him when I took him to a restaurant owned by a family from southern Mexico.  And when he saw cactus being sold at the market he just about fainted.  :lol:  It was a far cry from what he was used to.

 

 

BUT, there are regional differences all over Mexico.  The food from Chihuahua will look different than that from Veracruz, just like coastal California favorites are much different than southern Alabama.  Both American, but much different food.  And if I go overseas, the only "American" I'm likely to get is a burger with local flavor - like one with an egg on top.  Not bad, but different.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help me out. I don’t live where I have access to “the best†or “real Mexican food.†(We do have a taco place that was on Diners, Drive Thrus, and Dives.) I’ve had countless conversations where person A mentions they like a restaurant and person B, dripping with disdain, will point out that it’s not REAL Mexican food, but Tex Mex.

 

From where I’m standing, the menus overlap so greatly and they all seem to be playing with the same ten ingredients. There’s a lot deliciousness there. I’ve lived in Texas. I’ve lived in California. I’ve visited friends in Arizona who have strong opinions about this. Is it completely subjective? Is there a key menu item that outs them as one or the other?

 

Help me out here. What’s the difference and should I pick a side?

 

Personally, I prefer Tex-Mex to "real Mexican food"

 

Real Mexican food tends to be really spicy. Tex-Mex is happy to leave the spice out.

 

Edited by vonfirmath
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard that it is inferior, but only from people who have no Hispanic/Mexican/or even Texan blood in them whatsoever, but are total and complete know-it-alls about everything.

 

ETA: I live in Texas, and if Tex Mex is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

My Mexican husband would disagree wth you.

 

It’s mostly what you grew up with. Our friends from Texas truly miss Tex-mex. I get that.

 

I will say that marrying into a coastal Mexican family opened my eyes to the variety of Mexican food beyond what we eat here.

 

I think the biggest thing for me between superb Mexican food and bad is the greasiness. Good Mexican is not greasy. It’s fresh and light, with flavor but not grease.

 

That’s hard to find anywhere outside of my MIL’s kitchen.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where we were in FL, we had a lot of migrant workers for s good portion of the year. Trust me, I am no snob...can’t afford to be, but the food they cooked was SO much better than the so called Mexican places. Fresher ingredients and their food wasn’t loaded with cumin and hot sauce. They had a way of seasoning things that didn’t leave you with a fiery mouth and equally as fiery stomach. The food stood alone well enough to not need all the extra condiments. I can’t explain it, but once you are spoiled with it, there’s a difference.

Just like there are mediocre to terrible restaurants in every culinary tradition, there are mediocre Tex Mex places. That doesn’t make TexMex a bad food tradition. We don’t judge Italian food by the Olive Garden but many seem to judge TexMex by the various mediocre equivalents.

Edited by LucyStoner
  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like there are mediocre to terrible restaurants in every culinary tradition, there are mediocre Tex Mex places. That doesn’t make TexMex a bad food tradition. We don’t judge Italian food by the Olive Garden but many seem to judge TexMex by the various mediocre equivalents.

It’s not a bad food tradition, I just don’t want to eat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not a bad food tradition, I just don’t want to eat it.

I guess my issue is when people say it’s not Mexican food. It’s actually a regional cuisine, and not as some people think, merely fake Mexican food for white people.

 

Edited to add: I do agree with you that some of it is too greasy. However, so is a lot of crappy restaurant food. It certainly doesn’t need to be greasy. There is a lot more red meat because of the ranching culture on both sides of the border in that area.

Edited by LucyStoner
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I think it is hilarious when I travel and see "American" food. Like when we went to Costa Rica, and my son orderered a "perro caliente" (hot dog) which was covered in mayo and salad. In our Belgian grocery store, I can buy a prepackaged "American" hot dog with a cakey bun and a slice of processed cheese. I can also buy "American" condiment sauce which I think is a mix of ketchup, mustard, mayo & pickles, but I'm not brave enough to try it. So I can see why people who have experience with food from Mexico comment on the difference and are amused when people think that Mexicans eat taco bowls.

 

 

 

:) In Sweden, it seemed that the secret ingredient to make anything "American" was corn. American pizza? Cover it with corn! American pasta? Cover it with corn! American sandwich? Throw some corn in it! We were a bit puzzled, but, hey, it's corn, so it was all good. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, I can't tell the difference. I mean, I see that there are different ingredients and whatnot, but I have never eaten anything that was identified as "TexMex."

 

I don't like tacos made with flour tortillas instead of corn. That's just not right. Ditto enchiladas made with flour. Just...no. Once, in Virginia, I had Mexican rice that had *lima beans* in it. No. Just...no. I snicker when people who live elsewhere talk about having a "taco bar" at a party, but what they're really having is burritos (because flour tortillas).

 

But what do I know? I grew up in southeastern Virginia (not counting two years in Texas) with western European ancestors in the South for many generations. I've lived in California and Texas most of my adult life; I only know the "Mexican" food I've had in restaurants, and my recipes from Trader Vic's Mexican cookbook. None of my friends (until recently) have been Mexican; they're all just folks like me who only know Mexican restaurants. We just eat it and enjoy it, whatever it's called. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tex-Mex uses a lot more beef and aged yellow (cheddar-type) cheeses, whereas Mex-Mex uses more chicken and pork and younger, white cheeses like cotija, asadero, queso fresco, etc. Tex-Mex tends to use the same set of spices for everything, and it includes a lot of cumin. 

 

New Mexican food is different from Tex-Mex but it's not really Mex-Mex either. New Mexican food uses a lot more green chile (and spells it with an e!), black beans, blue corn, cilantro, and lime. I think it actually has some similarities to Yucatan food. They use more authentic Mexican cheeses, too. (This assumes you're eating in a local restaurant, not a Chili's, although even Chili's will ask "red or green?" when you order.)

 

Is posole a thing in Tex-Mex? It's common in New Mexico. I think the NM State Dish is probably green chile stew, made with potatoes, tomatoes, onions, roasted green chiles, and a little beef.

 

 

I don't know the difference between Mexican and Tex-Mex, but as a New Mexican (who grew up in OK, where they also serve Tex-Mex), I was going to explain the difference between New Mexican and Tex-Mex, but you did it perfectly.  Have you lived in NM at some point?  Posolé is definitely a bigger deal here, and, at least in my experience, carne adovada too.  I don't think I'd ever had either one of those until I moved here.

 

One little thing I can add:  in Tex-Mex, a sopapilla  was always served as a dessert, sprinkled with powdered sugar.  Here, your sopapillas are served with the meal, because many people like to dip them in chile.  But they're also served with honey, for those who prefer that.  But never with powdered sugar, and a friend who is a native New Mexican once ranted about how when she was traveling out of state, they ruined her sopapilla by putting powdered sugar on it.  She was pretty horrified!

 

Oh, and NM food has some blending with American foods and traditions that I didn't see in TX/OK:  of course there is the famous green chile cheeseburger, which I think has made it pretty far outside of NM now, the Albuquerque turkey (turkey sandwich with green chiles), pizza places here offer green chile as a topping, and for Thanksgiving you might see mashed potatoes with red chile instead of gravy, and of course the leftover turkey will be made into green chile stew.  Basically, in NM, it's all about the chile!  

 

Now I'm hungry!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I don't like tacos made with flour tortillas instead of corn. That's just not right. Ditto enchiladas made with flour. Just...no. Once, in Virginia, I had Mexican rice that had *lima beans* in it. No. Just...no. I snicker when people who live elsewhere talk about having a "taco bar" at a party, but what they're really having is burritos (because flour tortillas).

 

 

 

Neither do I.  Dh eats only flour tortillas, the kids and I like our corn ones lightly warmed or fried.  I tease him because flour tortillas aren't exactly Mexican food.  They were an invention of Jewish Spaniards who settled there during the Inquisition.  They didn't consider the corn to be kosher. So I guess they're really Span-Mex? :laugh: But I've never liked them and ds, who doesn't eat hardly any breads, won't touch them. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither do I. Dh eats only flour tortillas, the kids and I like our corn ones lightly warmed or fried. I tease him because flour tortillas aren't exactly Mexican food. They were an invention of Jewish Spaniards who settled there during the Inquisition. They didn't consider the corn to be kosher. So I guess they're really Span-Mex? :laugh: But I've never liked them and ds, who doesn't eat hardly any breads, won't touch them.

 

Well, then there's the fact that a tortilla in Spain is a sort of egg omelette.

 

I'm OK with the same word being used to mean different things by different people and in different places; that's just a reality of the way language naturally evolves.

 

So I'm fine with whatever people want to call Mexican food.

 

When I visited Mexico in 1984 I ate a sandwich sold as "hamburguesa americana" (American Hamburger)--it was made with shredded ham.

Edited by maize
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mexican, New Mexican and Tex-Mex are each a different cuisine. None are more “authentic†than the other, because they are different. Mexican food is very different from what we think it is because of problems with the terminology, when we Americans call Tex-Mex food “Mexicanâ€.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was horrified at sopapillas at some restaurants! I want NO sugar, cinnamon, or powdered sugar on them! Just honey for dip!

 

 

They are good with honey!  Much better than sugar and cinnamon.  But I think my favorite is the non-sweet version:  dipped in red chile.  So good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that it is snobbery to look down your nose at a cuisine from any region in the world just because you don’t like it. I’m talking about well made versions of that cuisine. I don’t like Scandinavian food but don’t say that Scandinavian food is inferior. It just isn’t a flavor profile that I personally like.

 

I personally think that a lot of recipes are good when made with fresh ingredients and by good cooks. Our local Mexican restaurants are owned by Mexican families who provide freshly cooked food with fresh ingredients. Their menu is varied with items that show off their regional specialties. They might also have some dishes that appeal more to “American taste†(I can think if a few especially at one restaurant. ). I don’t begrudge them that - it’s hard to be successful in the restaurant business and of course they want to cater to their customers.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither do I. Dh eats only flour tortillas, the kids and I like our corn ones lightly warmed or fried. I tease him because flour tortillas aren't exactly Mexican food. They were an invention of Jewish Spaniards who settled there during the Inquisition. They didn't consider the corn to be kosher. So I guess they're really Span-Mex? :laugh: But I've never liked them and ds, who doesn't eat hardly any breads, won't touch them.

 

A lot of traditional Mexican food has Spanish influence.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess my issue is when people say it’s not Mexican food. It’s actually a regional cuisine, and not as some people think, merely fake Mexican food for white people.

 

Edited to add: I do agree with you that some of it is too greasy. However, so is a lot of crappy restaurant food. It certainly doesn’t need to be greasy. There is a lot more red meat because of the ranching culture on both sides of the border in that area.

I will confess to having said that before. Probably because the only people that I’ve ever known to advocate for Tex-mex are white people who think velveta is an acceptable topping for Mexican food.

 

I will concede that there is more to Tex mex than that (probably more intellectually than in my heart, if I’m being honest!).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love "Indian" food, "Greek" food, "Italian" food, "Mexican" food, "French" food, and a lot of other food besides!  But I am not under any misapprehension that it is the same food that would actually be served in those countries.  Food will be different depending on who makes it and where - why must it be pigeon-holed???

 

Let's just eat - and enjoy - good food!!

 

Anne (who is now feeling hungry!!)

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never been in a Mexican restaurant that used Velveeta or any kind of yellow cheese. But our Mexican restaurants here are owned by Mexicans and seem to be pretty authentic. I've never known any person who used Velveeta for Mexican food at home, but I do know some who use cheddar. I may have been guilty of that myself a few. times, when it was all I had on hand. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither do I.  Dh eats only flour tortillas, the kids and I like our corn ones lightly warmed or fried.  I tease him because flour tortillas aren't exactly Mexican food.  They were an invention of Jewish Spaniards who settled there during the Inquisition.  They didn't consider the corn to be kosher. So I guess they're really Span-Mex? :laugh: But I've never liked them and ds, who doesn't eat hardly any breads, won't touch them. 

 

 

I'd have still called that Mexican, the same way fish and chips are British.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...