Jump to content

Menu

Horrible movies based on books?


Mandylubug
 Share

Recommended Posts

Oh my, we just finished Disney's A Wrinkle in Time based on the book. It was horrible. So bad that my kids wanted to stop watching it. My experience is typically the book is best, movie slightly cheesy pattern. However, this movie was HORRIBLE and it even through in evolution snippits that were not even in the book. The book painted a masterly planned universe battling evil. I have no issue with evolution being included in stories texts etc. I do have an issue when you make a production and change one context of a story to make it more politically correct. Maybe P.C. isn't the correct terminology. IDK

 

Any other book to movie's we should skip?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

World War Z.  The movie was completely unrelated to the book, except that both involve zombies.  It was also just an all-around bad movie; one that is difficult to enjoy even if you manage to forget that it is supposed to be based on a book.  It was so pitiful that by the middle of the movie people weren't being scared by the zombies; when they appeared on-screen in a scene that was supposed to be frightening and suspenseful, the audience in the theater laughed at the zombies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The third in the Anne of Green Gables trilogy with Megan Follows. Absolutely nothing to do with the books really. The second - Anne of Avonlea - took some deep rabbit trails but the subject matter of the third is nowhere to be found in the books. It's not horrible just not true to the books. I actually enjoy all three movies - the third least of all.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The third in the Anne of Green Gables trilogy with Megan Follows. Absolutely nothing to do with the books really. The second - Anne of Avonlea - took some deep rabbit trails but the subject matter of the third is nowhere to be found in the books. It's not horrible just not true to the books. I actually enjoy all three movies - the third least of all.

 

I love the first two movies though I know they deviate dramatically from the books.  I am OK with them because I believe they do a good job of capturing the spirit of Anne.  I refuse to watch the third movie because from the previews I saw it was just too far from the books and didn't seem "right" to me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Firm. The only movie I have ever walked out of.

 

I've read the book but not seen the movie.  Is it a major departure from the book?  Runaway Jury, another Grisham novel, has a completely different premise in the movie version.  I love the movie version of The Client though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starship Troopers wins the award hands down. Not only were the worthwhile themes of the book lost, so was the cool scifi battle suit stuff that would have been a much better use of special effects budget than making aliens with energy blasting butts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterworld with Kevin Costner.  One of only two movies I've ever walked out on.  Major, major snoozefest.  Painful to watch. 

 

Although technically, it falls outside the scope of this thread.  The book was based on the screenplay for the movie - not the other way around.  However, the book came out about a month before the movie opened. It is supposedly better than the movie (I have not read it). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 7 Harry Potter Movies

Narnia Prince Caspian

Narnia Voyage of the Dawn Treader

The Secret of NIMH

Dragonball Evolution (Based on the manga/graphic novel Dragon Ball)

The Page Master <---just a horrible movie in general

Disney Movies based on fairytales tend to be pretty awful, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daddy Long-Legs.  The book was delightful (one of those old-fashioned girl-at-a-boarding-school books where the protagonist has a secret benefactor who she eventually falls in love with, and he her) -- and the movie just plain awful.  It was a 1950's musical with Fred Astaire and Leslie Caron that had these horrible ballet dream sequences throughout.  Ugh.  If you saw the movie first, and weren't aware of the book, maybe (except for the horrid b.d.s). But only maybe, and the book is SO much better. 

 

daddylonglegs_zps9774f72d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Dark is Rising. I refused to even entertain the notion of watching the movie when I read they'd made Will Stanton an American. The trailer sealed the deal.

Seriously? How does it even work if he's an American?

 

Swiss Family Robinson. The movie is a disneyfied disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daddy Long-Legs.  The book was delightful (one of those old-fashioned girl-at-a-boarding-school books where the protagonist has a secret benefactor who she eventually falls in love with, and he her) -- and the movie just plain awful.  It was a 1950's musical with Fred Astaire and Leslie Caron that had these horrible ballet dream sequences throughout.  Ugh.  If you saw the movie first, and weren't aware of the book, maybe (except for the horrid b.d.s). But only maybe, and the book is SO much better. 

 

daddylonglegs_zps9774f72d.jpg

 

Oh, yes! Actually I thought the movie was sort of charming in its own way, but completely divorced from the book. In fact, some time a few months ago, I was trying to recall the movie that we had seen about a rich man and a girls' school and dancing, and I couldn't remember the name at all. Daddy Long Legs never came to my mind, presumably since it so different from the book. So you have helped me remember the movie now! I don't particularly want to see it again, but I hate when I have forgotten the name of something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously? How does it even work if he's an American?

 

Swiss Family Robinson. The movie is a disneyfied disaster.

 

Seriously.  Look at this review:

 

 

Our young hero is Will Shanton (Alexander Ludwig). Will is your average awkward teen struggling to fit in after his father's job forced the family to move overseas from America to England. He's just turned 14, and has also just discovered that he's part of a prophecy that he never knew about. Supposedly, thousands of years ago, there was a great battle between the forces of Light and Darkness for control of the world. Light won out in the end, but Dark is vying to make a comeback. The Dark is represented by a villain called The Rider (Christopher Eccleston), named so because he rides around on horseback. The Rider keeps on appearing before our young hero, and sending demonic mall security guards and evil grannies who can summon snakes after him. He claims to be looking for "the Signs", but Will doesn't know what he's talking about. Fortunately, there are some people to help explain Will's destiny, and explain the plot (but do little else). They represent the "Light", and inform Will that he is the "Seeker", and that only he has the power to seek out six Signs - powerful artifacts from the past that hold the fate of the world. As the Seeker, Will gains various powers including super strength and traveling through time, of which only the time travel one seems to be of any use to him in his search.

 

All the ingredients are here for a fun fantasy adventure, but The Seeker: The Dark is Rising doesn't even seem interested in itself. This movie has such a shocking lack of wonder and whimsy, two things all fantasy adventures must have. The incredible keeps on showing its face throughout the story, but the movie forgets to allow the characters to react or even respond to it. At one point, Will's younger sister discovers her brother's power first hand when she accidentally travels through time with him. How does she react to this? She doesn't. She finds herself transported thousands of years in the past in the middle of a battle, and all she cares about is that she rescued a kitten from the battlefield. She doesn't even ask her brother what's going on, nor does she ever bring it up again in a later scene. She does, however, keep on clutching to that little kitten she found for the rest of the movie. I guess time travel, super powers, and the fate of the world itself just can't hold a candle to the adorableness of a kitty cat.

It's like they just kept some of the names and left off, oh I don't know, the entire plot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoy the movie Mary Poppins, but it does not at all represent the real character of MP.  Walt sapped her up, and she didn't need sapping up.  I also know DVD's  'cockney' accent was a crime, but his awesome dancing  helped make that movie great. Feed the Birds gets props as well. 

 

My youngest actually cried during The Lightening Thief she was so disappointed. At one point she shrieked in disbelief because it was so awful (and was then mortified by her behavior).  I wanted to cry for her.

 

SFR?  Horrible. I'm not even a fan of the book, but the movie was a sham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The third in the Anne of Green Gables trilogy with Megan Follows. Absolutely nothing to do with the books really. The second - Anne of Avonlea - took some deep rabbit trails but the subject matter of the third is nowhere to be found in the books. It's not horrible just not true to the books. I actually enjoy all three movies - the third least of all.

 

The third movie is just bizarre.

 

It is as if a director suddenly decided they were going to film a AU fanfiction rather than the actual book.  Wrong time period, added characters, and a completely different plot. I have never seen anything so strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterworld with Kevin Costner. One of only two movies I've ever walked out on. Major, major snoozefest. Painful to watch.

The book is way better. Wait, I was thinking of The Postman.

 

Another book based on screenplay better than the movie: The Puppet Masters by Robert Heinlein. He wrote the screenplay, but the way the story went in the book just wouldn't fly in the movies back then--too much nudity.

 

Although technically, it falls outside the scope of this thread. The book was based on the screenplay for the movie - not the other way around. However, the book came out about a month before the movie opened. It is supposedly better than the movie (I have not read it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...some time a few months ago, I was trying to recall the movie that we had seen about a rich man and a girls' school and dancing, and I couldn't remember the name at all. Daddy Long Legs never came to my mind, presumably since it so different from the book. So you have helped me remember the movie now! I don't particularly want to see it again, but I hate when I have forgotten the name of something.

 

Glad to be of service  :D (and make sure to read the book!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Side of the Mountain.  By far the worst.  If you know the book, you know that Frightful is a peregrine falcon befriended by a boy.   There are two books following the first one, both featuring Frightful.  However, in the movie based on the first book, Frightful dies.  My kids were completely traumatized by this movie.  We had to reread all 3 books after watching it to erase the abomination from their minds.  More than 10 years on, though, they remember it. 

 

Second runner-up is Stuart Little.  Ugh.  We couldn't even finish watching that. But at least it wasn't traumatizing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starship Troopers.  I almost didn't read the book because of the movie.  The book is one of the best science fiction books I've ever read.  

 

I always thought this was a spoof intending to make fun of science fiction movies by being totally overdone and overplaying the worst stereotypes of sci-fi movies.  I did read the book but I don't really expect movies to match the books anymore.

 

Dh really liked The Hobbit movie and the LOTR movies, and he's a big fan of the books as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Firm. The only movie I have ever walked out of.

Funny you should say that. I despised the book The Firm. I thought it was so boring & really hate Grisham's writing style (way too simplistic, like he's writing for 1st graders to read it). I ended up seeing the movie because the book was so boring, figuring Hollywood would have to do *something* to make it interesting since there was nothing to work with from the book (imo). So, I found the movie better than the book, just because the movie was slightly less boring than the novel. (Both were bad, though.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dune by Frank Herbert.  (I'm showing how old I am, aren't I?)

 

 

 

I liked Starship Troopers because of it's over-the-top campyness. I was disappointed by the book.

 

I also liked Costner's The Postman, and was also disappointed by the book.  The book seemed anti-climactic.

 

 

You guys aren't going to let me pick the movie on movie night, are you?   (I must have no taste in movies).  :laugh:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watership Downs, V I Warshawski. I try and avoid movies based on books I like but I don't mind the harry potter movies too much and I like the BBC dramatisations of the Ruth Rendall mysteries, Inspector Morse etc. I won't even try any Narnia adaptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disney's adaptation of A Ring of Endless Light was awful, too. Worse than A Wrinkle In Time IMO. They seemed to go out of their way to drastically change the core personalities of all the characters, in addition to the basic premise of the story. Real stupid changes that just didn't fit - Rob mounting butterflies with needles, Grandfather taking the kids for the summer without the parents there and hiding the fact that he had leukemia, the parents trying to force Vicky into some science school. Really messed up.

 

Girl, Interrupted was bugged me similarly.

 

But I agree that Starship Troopers is probably the worst.

 

And probably Cheaper by the Dozen, which I admit I haven't actually seen, but it doesn't look like it could bear anything more than a passing resemblance to the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lightening Thief and now that it's out Sea Of Monsters.  TLT was so riddled with creative license there was just no way to redeem it in Sea of Monsters.  My kids and I LOVE the Percy Jackson books and after seeing the Lightening Thief, I got a 45 minute diatribe from my oldest son about how bad they have screwed it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="ocelotmom" post="5246538" timestamp=

 

And probably Cheaper by the Dozen, which I admit I haven't actually seen, but it doesn't look like it could bear anything more than a passing resemblance to the book.

 

The newest Cheaper by the Dozen is really terrible. Other than the correct number of children, it has nothing to do with the book. There is a movie from 1950 that I thought was a good representation of the book. It would be worth checking out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's perfectly fair to like some of these movies if you haven't read the book. I like the original Dune (though the syfy miniseries was better in many ways and definitely truer to the book), and Ella Enchanted. But I never really got into Frank Herbert's writing, and never read Ella Enchanted at all.

 

The animated Hobbit was so bad it was good. "Frodo of the nine fingers, and the ring of dooooom!"

 

Starship Troopers really spoke to me when I was young and serving my country. The movie was just a wretched mangling of a book I valued for its themes and a total letdown on the effects side--where were the Battle Suits!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heidi with Shirley Temple. The boys absolutely loved the novel when I read it to them a couple years ago. Usually after we read a book, we will often watch the movie adaptation. Heidi was horrible. We were all "yelling" at the screen; I wanted to turn it off but the boys wanted to see if there was any redemptive value in it. Nope. None. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 7 Harry Potter Movies

.

There were 8. :)

 

For me it was a huge mistake to watch an HP movie right after reading (or re-reading) the book. I enjoyed them much more when a lot of time had passed between reading and watching. I usually try to wait at least a year before watching a movie adaptation of a book I've read; otherwise, I'll just get mad and it'll be a complete waste of time.

 

I just remembered another one. The BBC version of The Woman in White was terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...