Jump to content

Menu

Math problem. What do you get?


What's your answer?  

  1. 1. What's your answer?

    • 30 weeks
      7
    • 31 weeks
      145
    • other?
      2


Recommended Posts

30.53

 

So the last payment will not be a full payment but it will take 31 weeks to pay it off in its entirety. Now, if there were any late charges of fees associated with this account there will be a bit extra to pay off the last week of the loan. And the last payment could be more than $12 if there are fees involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it would take him 30 weeks to pay off 360 dollars. So I vote for 31 weeks.

 

Exactly. There would still be $6.38 left to pay and he wouldn't be able to pay for that until the next week, the 31st week.

 

It reminds me of problems that say 9 students are being driven to the zoo. 4 fit in one car. How many cars do they need? 3, because 4 each in 2 cars makes only 8 students. Unless they are going to strap the left-over student to the roof of the car, they need another car for him to ride in! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer on the test is 30. I want to ask dd's teacher if she can get credit for 31.

 

I would, unless the teacher can prove to you that $12/week equals the amount of the bike. Maybe it's assumed the person has pocket money left over? :tongue_smilie:

 

We use Keystone. I've sent in corrections for their courses and for the textbooks. Ugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way for the answer to be 30, unless the problem specifically said to estimate. Perhaps the teacher was careless? I have seen math errors on marked work before.

 

a) Since it deals with price, even if the price of the bike were 360.01 he would STILL not have enough money after 30 weeks.

 

b) Even if applied, rounding procedures should round it to 31, although normal rounding procedures do not make sense here -- it must be rounded up.

 

The example of children in cars is a good one as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things like this are why I've never been a math person. For example, if you make weekly payments and you make your first payment today, and your second payment next Friday, did you make those payments in two weeks? It's two separate calendar weeks, but not 2 weeks time.

 

Drives me nuts, I tell ya, but it's probably just me.

 

Anywho, yes I would call about credit for 31 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18.

(2 points) Carlotta wants to buy a mountain bike. The bike costs $366.38. She plans to make weekly payments of $12. About how many weeks will it take her to buy the bike?

weeks

 

ETA- This is copied and pasted from test. Call the teacher for credit of 31 weeks?

 

I can see how the wording makes the answer 30, but I do believe a well presented case would give your child a chance at getting the points. Point out that the correct answer is 30.53 and therefore rounding would dictate going up to 31, therefore that answer should be seen as valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s look a simpler problem.

 

$46 total, $12 weekly payments.

3.83 weeks, round up to 4 weeks.

 

But look at it this way.

 

1st payment on Monday (total paid $12)

 

then 7 days (1 week) later

2nd payment on Monday (total paid $24)

 

then 7 days (1 week) later

3rd payment on Monday (total paid $36)

 

then 7 days (1 week) later

4th (partial) payment on Monday (total paid $46)

 

So, 3 weeks to pay off the debt.

That is, 1 week less than the original solution of 4 weeks.

 

So the solution to the OP problem 30 weeks (1 week less than 31 weeks).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to see this might be one of those "how many pages did you read" type questions. If time is zeroed out at the moment of the first payment then 30 weeks transpire when the final payment (of 31) is made.

 

The question (as asked) is very vague.

 

Bill

 

Yeah. Have they been taught to 0 time out when the first payment is made?

 

Unless this has been specifically taught I would find marking 31 wrong as unacceptably vague.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:iagree: LOL. She's 10 with only Everyday Math training.

 

They are going to say:

 

Payment 1=0 Weeks

Payment 2=1 Week

Payment 3=2 Weeks

Payment 4=3 Weeks

Payment 5=4 Weeks

Payment 6=5 Weeks

Payment 7=6 Weeks

Payment 8=7 Weeks

Payment 9=8 Weeks

Payment 10=9 Weeks

Payment 11=10 Weeks

Payment 12=11 Weeks

Payment 13=12 Weeks

Payment 14=13 Weeks

Payment 15=14 Weeks

Payment 16=15 Weeks

Payment 17=16 Weeks

Payment 18=17 Weeks

Payment 19=18 Weeks

Payment 20=19 Weeks

Payment 21=20 Weeks

Payment 22=21 Weeks

Payment 23=22 Weeks

Payment 24=23 Weeks

Payment 25=24 Weeks

Payment 26=25 Weeks

Payment 27=26 Weeks

Payment 28=27 Weeks

Payment 29=28 Weeks

Payment 30=29 Weeks

Payment 31=30 Weeks

 

Bill

Edited by Spy Car
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. Have they been taught to 0 time out when the first payment is made?

 

Unless this has been specifically taught I would find marking 31 wrong as unacceptably vague.

 

:iagree:

 

Singapore Math is somewhat famous for including these sorts of questions, but the kids are prepared for them.

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 weeks is totally wrong. I would talk to the teacher.

 

LOL. Spy Car. You are going to make me start over-thinking it.

 

This has always been my problem. In my English graduate program, none of us could do a word problem to save our lives. I've decided that people who have based most of their academic careers on nuances in language have also sacrificed the ability to do elementary word problems :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...I think the word "about" is implying to round off to a more general number. 30 is much more general than 31, but I think it is poor wording.

 

:iagree: I voted 31 weeks, but the word "about" implies we're looking for an estimate rather than the exact answer. So in my head, I think, well 12 goes into $360 evenly and $360 is close to $366, so about 30 weeks. But I think credit should also be given for a correct answer, i.e. 31 weeks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this case, with estimating, the answer is 29. :tongue_smilie:

 

They are going to say:

 

Payment 1=0 Weeks

Payment 2=1 Week

Payment 3=2 Weeks

Payment 4=3 Weeks

Payment 5=4 Weeks

Payment 6=5 Weeks

Payment 7=6 Weeks

Payment 8=7 Weeks

Payment 9=8 Weeks

Payment 10=9 Weeks

Payment 11=10 Weeks

Payment 12=11 Weeks

Payment 13=12 Weeks

Payment 14=13 Weeks

Payment 15=14 Weeks

Payment 16=15 Weeks

Payment 17=16 Weeks

Payment 18=17 Weeks

Payment 19=18 Weeks

Payment 20=19 Weeks

Payment 21=20 Weeks

Payment 22=21 Weeks

Payment 23=22 Weeks

Payment 24=23 Weeks

Payment 25=24 Weeks

Payment 26=25 Weeks

Payment 27=26 Weeks

Payment 28=27 Weeks

Payment 29=28 Weeks

Payment 30=29 Weeks

Payment 31=30 Weeks

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it says "about how many weeks" you are supposed to estimate. The way it is being taught in schools now is that you use mental math to figure it out - $366.38 (or whatever, I can't remember) is close to $360 which $12 goes into evenly for 30 weeks. Not the way I was taught, but it is what is being taught now. At least in ps here it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, I would have said 31, the question is vague.

 

From the wording you could argue that she makes no payment, it only says she is "planning" on making weekly payments. Perhaps she missed a few weeks and the bike was repossessed. So she may never pay off the bike. The problem doesn't give us enough information to make a correct assessment. :tongue_smilie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was this question in a group of questions with directions?? I could see this being a group that said to use your estimating skills to find the answer. 30 would be right because you would estimate 360, divide by 12 and get 30. And I wouldn't think it was zero out payment 1 problem because that is usually referred to as a down payment with weekly payments afterward. The wording indicates that she is going to make payments every week until it's paid, not that she is going to put down money. If this was an estimation test or a question with directions that said to estimate,then I would say 31 is wrong. If it didn't give directions on how to solve and is not a specific chapter test that was on estimation, then I would say she is right because the bike can't be paid off in 30 weeks and rounding up is correct! But the word about screams estimation and 30 would be right because it takes about 30 weeks of $12.00 to pay it off. It's thirty weeks of 12 and chump change the next week.

 

If the problem had asked how many weeks to pay it off, or how many payments would be needed that would be 31. But this one specifically wants to know how many 12.00 payments are needed. It bites. we hated those and still argue, fuss,and kick and scream over them as mine consider it trick wording. LOL! We struggled mightily with this and I had to do a lot of studying to figure out why this would be wrong. But I would call and find out why because estimation skills are very "in " right now and understanding how to solve those are important for test answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest submarines
I think I get what some are saying here. It'll take 31 payments but only 30 weeks.

 

True, but I don't think she was marked down because of that. She was marked down because she was supposed to estimate. :ack2:

 

I really dislike poorly worded questions and the over-emphasis on estimation. Technically speaking, if they wanted an estimation (and not rounding to the nearest...) then 29, 30, and 31 should all be correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. There would still be $6.38 left to pay and he wouldn't be able to pay for that until the next week, the 31st week.

 

It reminds me of problems that say 9 students are being driven to the zoo. 4 fit in one car. How many cars do they need? 3, because 4 each in 2 cars makes only 8 students. Unless they are going to strap the left-over student to the roof of the car, they need another car for him to ride in! :D

 

 

Oh yeah, don't you love real world math! :lol:

 

I actually had a student in math class that I was subbing for get quite indignant with me that the third car (same problem you are describing) was not needed and his answer of 8 should be correct because the 9th person should sit on someone's lap!

 

I pointed out that this would be against the law in this state and that it is important that our answers to any real world problem make logical, legal sense.

 

His response, "Logic? This is math class. What does logic have to do with anything?" :glare: Sigh..sub-pay just isn't high enough! :D

 

Faith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but I don't think she was marked down because of that. She was marked down because she was supposed to estimate. :ack2:

 

I really dislike poorly worded questions and the over-emphasis on estimation. Technically speaking, if they wanted an estimation (and not rounding to the nearest...) then 29, 30, and 31 should all be correct.

 

 

GRRRR 31 is a perfectly legitimate estimation as well!

 

Faith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it says "about how many weeks" you are supposed to estimate. The way it is being taught in schools now is that you use mental math to figure it out - $366.38 (or whatever, I can't remember) is close to $360 which $12 goes into evenly for 30 weeks. Not the way I was taught, but it is what is being taught now. At least in ps here it is.

 

Yes, but since $366.38 is clearly more than the $360 used in this estimate, it is also reasonable to add another payment on. In other words, if one does the estimate as Truscifi did, it's clear that it will take an extra payment beyond the 30. This is obvious without figuring an exact answer to 366.38/12 and then rounding it off, so I would absolutely argue it with the teacher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are going to say:

 

Payment 1=0 Weeks

Payment 2=1 Week

Payment 3=2 Weeks

Payment 4=3 Weeks

Payment 5=4 Weeks

Payment 6=5 Weeks

Payment 7=6 Weeks

Payment 8=7 Weeks

Payment 9=8 Weeks

Payment 10=9 Weeks

Payment 11=10 Weeks

Payment 12=11 Weeks

Payment 13=12 Weeks

Payment 14=13 Weeks

Payment 15=14 Weeks

Payment 16=15 Weeks

Payment 17=16 Weeks

Payment 18=17 Weeks

Payment 19=18 Weeks

Payment 20=19 Weeks

Payment 21=20 Weeks

Payment 22=21 Weeks

Payment 23=22 Weeks

Payment 24=23 Weeks

Payment 25=24 Weeks

Payment 26=25 Weeks

Payment 27=26 Weeks

Payment 28=27 Weeks

Payment 29=28 Weeks

Payment 30=29 Weeks

Payment 31=30 Weeks

 

Bill

 

This is correct. It's similar to the question of how many feet long is a fence with 31 fenceposts spaced 1 foot apart, it's 30 feet if you neglect the width of the posts themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but since $366.38 is clearly more than the $360 used in this estimate, it is also reasonable to add another payment on. In other words, if one does the estimate as Truscifi did, it's clear that it will take an extra payment beyond the 30. This is obvious without figuring an exact answer to 366.38/12 and then rounding it off, so I would absolutely argue it with the teacher.

 

It will take 31 payments. No question about that. But it only takes 30 weeks to make 31 payments if you zero time out at the time of the first payment.

 

See?

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, 30 weeks is on $360, so is the teacher going to pay the other $6.38?

 

I think the word "about" is implying to round off to a more general number. 30 is much more general than 31, but I think it is poor wording.

 

:iagree: Were there other problems involving rounding to the nearest 10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it says "about how many weeks" you are supposed to estimate. The way it is being taught in schools now is that you use mental math to figure it out - $366.38 (or whatever, I can't remember) is close to $360 which $12 goes into evenly for 30 weeks. Not the way I was taught, but it is what is being taught now. At least in ps here it is.

 

True, and now that I know it's Everyday Math, I wouldn't be surprised if the teacher doesn't mark it correct. This young girl will be penalized for looking at the answer from a real life application. Hopefully the teacher will realize that the student really thought about this problem and that either 30 or 31 should be considered valid answers. Unfortunately, I've known teachers who will stand by their original decision because the correct answer is reflective of the particular concept in the textbook. It just burns my bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will take 31 payments. No question about that. But it only takes 30 weeks to make 31 payments if you zero time out at the time of the first payment.

 

See?

 

Bill

 

I see that; I'm just not convinced that's what the teacher was thinking. In my experience, elementary-school math that says "about" is asking the child to estimate, so that's why I was responding to the estimation. I think it will be interesting to hear what the teacher's explanation of the problem is.

Edited by Sun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but I don't think she was marked down because of that. She was marked down because she was supposed to estimate. :ack2:

 

I really dislike poorly worded questions and the over-emphasis on estimation. Technically speaking, if they wanted an estimation (and not rounding to the nearest...) then 29, 30, and 31 should all be correct.

:iagree::iagree:

robin in nj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really dislike poorly worded questions and the over-emphasis on estimation. Technically speaking, if they wanted an estimation (and not rounding to the nearest...) then 29, 30, and 31 should all be correct.

 

GRRRR 31 is a perfectly legitimate estimation as well!

Faith

 

Agree with both of the above. There are any number of ways to estimate. If the child showed work describing a reasonable method, then credit should be given. I understand that they want to teach "estimate" as a separate skill from "calculate", but I'm not convinced that the "about" in the question implied only estimation, as when you consider 1) the partial final payment, and 2) the whole first payment = week 0 issue, then 31 is "about" the number of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest submarines
DD got a 76% on this math test! She got full credit (2pts) for this problem!!!

 

That's awesome! Was it after you contacted the teacher? Did the teacher say anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...