Epicurean Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 (edited) A local carpenter is making a dining table for us out of a rustic slab of wood. It's an eight person table, and the two chairs at the ends will be almost like mini benches with backs on them. Then we will have two long benches down the sides. Should we have backs on the long benches or no backs? I'm thinking that no backs makes it easier to get in and out. But having backs will match the end chairs. We intend on using the table for homeschooling, so it seems like having backs would make it more comfy for kids? I don't know. Edited July 23, 2017 by Epicurean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elizabeth86 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I guess it depends. My 5 and under crew sit on a bench for eating and school and it is great, but they dont sit all the way back in a chair yet, so the bench is actually a better fit for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsheresomewhere Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I vote have backs. As the kids grow, they will appreciate it and so will guests. Not too long ago, we had to use a table with just benches for a week on vacation. No backs and it was not comfortable to us. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagleynne Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I say no backs. How would someone sitting in the middle of a long bench get out if there's a back on it? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spryte Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I prefer no backs. We have people in sitting in the middle who want to get up and get something - no backs means they don't disturb everyone else. But we also have other areas with chairs with backs. So, if we're having a dinner party and it's not just kids, and we want to relax after dinner with wine or espresso, we move to another area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MommyLiberty5013 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I say no backs. How would someone sitting in the middle of a long bench get out if there's a back on it? This. Exactly. We have a 2 person bench now at our table. It has a back. If two people are on it, and one has to get up, the other has to move too. It is annoying and I wish I had thought of that problem before I bought it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMamaBird Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 We have a dining table with four matching chairs and then two rickety mismatched chairs we use because we need them. Once we can afford it we're going to get two more, but I"m starting to consider a bench for my two wiggly boys to share. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epicurean Posted July 24, 2017 Author Share Posted July 24, 2017 Great points so far for both sides. This is going to be hard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tap Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 (edited) We had a table with benches (no backs) growing up. Us kids, hated it. Once your feet could touch the floor and sit straight up, there was no back support. I grew up in a "no elbows on the table" and "don't leave the table till evryone has finished" family. So, once you finished eating, we had to sit straight up and wait for everyone. Edited July 24, 2017 by Tap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKL Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 As a person who really needs back support, I would not use a backless bench for my regular table. I understand the concern about it being hard to get in and out. But if you have any guests who aren't super spry, they are going to find a backless bench difficult also. You don't expect granny to climb over a bench to get to the table, do you? Is it possible to have two or more shorter benches with backs, instead of the long bench? Otherwise I would just go with chairs. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKL Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 When I was a kid, we had a "deacon's bench" for 2-3 young kids to sit at. It had a back and was positioned against the wall. Since only young kids had to climb into it, it was not a big deal. Everyone else sat on a chair (with a back). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shelly in IL Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 Instead of two long benches with no back, how about 4 short benches with backs to match the ends? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slackermom Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 I have a table with benches, but I keep one long side against the wall when we are using all of the seating. That works to provide a back for those who are seated there. If there are more than 2 people sitting on a bench, backless is better, so nobody is trapped. But it would be uncomfortable to sit at for very long. If the table is quite long, 2 short benches with backs per side sounds great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KungFuPanda Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 We can spend hours at our dining table. Nobody will stay for hours at our picnic table with no backs. I wouldn't just get backs, I'd consider pads too. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbel Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 I hate backless benches. I get the concern about a person being trapped. But, it's so uncomfortable for any length of time. Bad for posture too, I'd imagine, because of having to lean on the table. I think I would just get chairs and forget about benches altogether. Though I do like the look of benches. But anyway, a person in the middle is a bit trapped on a backless bench too. Our backyard table has backless benches. It's still a pain for the middle person to get in and out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selkie Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 If chairs are an option, I would go with them over benches. Chairs are more comfortable, imo, and getting out of them is easier. When our family sits at benches, someone inevitably feels squished while someone else complains that the bench is too far back and they can't reach the table. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QueenCat Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 I would not be able to sit there for an extended meal without a back. As a not so young adult, I need the support. Don't just think of how old your kids are now, think of the future and of guests. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carol in Cal. Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 I'd get chairs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catz Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 Maybe it's just what you're used to. We have backless stools without cushions in our kitchen and we spend hours in there. They tuck under a tall table that an also be use as counter space. It's actually better for your core and back to not be leaning against a chair back. We use yoga balls to sit on a lot of the time when we're homeschooling at a table. I do think tuck under stools could be a good alternative too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinder Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 No option for chairs? I'd rather sit on mismatched chairs than a backless bench. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kewb Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 Chairs. If not an option, a back on the bench. I do not enjoy an extended meal sitting on a backless bench. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mbelle Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 We have a backless bench on one side of the table. I do think it looks nice. If we have people over for dinner I usually try to make sure the guests have a chair as my back gets tired after an hour or so of sitting without support. We are the type to sit around and talk at the table for awhile. It is easier to get in and out of the bench for most people, but chairs are the easiest. It's also easier to squish in more kids for extra seating if another family is over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.