Jump to content

Menu

Can I have your thoughts?


gardenmom5
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, kiwik said:

As in "you are such a nice young man- I wish you were my son in law"? If so thar seems harmless.  Or "I wish my daughters had chosen you for a husband rather than the guys they married (who I obviously dislike)? That seems a bit rude.

The second.  He makes more money than her sons-in-law.  Possibly as much (or close to) as all three of her sils/husbands combined.  (One she has decided she likes. He's blue collar but works hard and supports his family. two of whom she doesn't have fuzzy feelings.)

But this was said to a relative's HUSBAND.  He was already married to someone else. Like - he shouldn't have chosen who he did.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Hannah said:

I'd think "her filter broke today" and just move on.

This. I’ve said things at times which I cringed over later, after realizing they could be interpreted in ways I didn’t mean. It sounds like an offhand remark, not well thought out, and perhaps unfortunate, but not something I’d give much weight.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine telling anyone that they should have married someone else - especially if they are currently married. 
That's bizarre.  And inappropriate.

If I were the person she said it too, I'd tell her I'm happily married with a glance that spoke volumes and move off. 

If I were one of the son-in-laws (that mom wishes this guy would replace if I am understanding correctly), I'd be miffed. If I were one of her dds, I would be miffed too. If there were out of character for mom, I might check on her medical/mental status. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kiwik said:

I would just shrug and ignore it.

Yep - it's in poor taste, but it doesn't seem like it'll suddenly cause two married people to leave their spouses for each other. It would be more of an eye-rolling moment than anything else for me.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gardenmom5 said:

The second.  He makes more money than her sons-in-law.  Possibly as much (or close to) as all three of her sils/husbands combined.  (One she has decided she likes. He's blue collar but works hard and supports his family. two of whom she doesn't have fuzzy feelings.)

But this was said to a relative's HUSBAND.  He was already married to someone else. Like - he shouldn't have chosen who he did.

If the comment said was the comment first posted, it is a big reach to make it mean, “You should not have married X.”

 

 I’d have taken it to mean, “You’re great. Wish my daughters had married someone like you.”

 It’s complimentary if said daughters are single and snarky when they’re married. In this scenario I’d read it to say far more about her sons in law than the young man or his chosen bride. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BlsdMama said:

If the comment said was the comment first posted, it is a big reach to make it mean, “You should not have married X.”

 

 I’d have taken it to mean, “You’re great. Wish my daughters had married someone like you.”

 It’s complimentary if said daughters are single and snarky when they’re married. In this scenario I’d read it to say far more about her sons in law than the young man or his chosen bride. 

It definitely says something about her feelings towards her sons-in-law - but she's the one who raised her daughters who chose those sons-in-law.   

She didn't say "i wish/why couldn't my daughters have married someone like you." - she said "why couldn't *you* have married one of my daughters?"

The guy would have had zero interest in any of her daughters - even had he met them when all of them were single.   They're not his type.

3 hours ago, Bambam said:

I can't imagine telling anyone that they should have married someone else - especially if they are currently married. 
That's bizarre.  And inappropriate.

If I were the person she said it too, I'd tell her I'm happily married with a glance that spoke volumes and move off. 

If I were one of the son-in-laws (that mom wishes this guy would replace if I am understanding correctly), I'd be miffed. If I were one of her dds, I would be miffed too. If there were out of character for mom, I might check on her medical/mental status. 

 

He now keeps his distance from her when visiting the area where "the families" live.  He's also shut her down over other (more typical, but still "off") things.

None of her daughters live an easy distance from her.  One lives halfway across the country.  (She made no secret she would have stopped that wedding if she could have, and bought a year's worth of BC for the daughter because she couldn't. - maybe that should be in the marriage thread. . .  )   

I don't know if any of the sons-in-law know she said that, and it is a reflection on how she feels about them.  I think it is also a reflection of how she feels about her own daughters.  It's not really out of character, but the OTT of it was shocking nonetheless.  

2 hours ago, AmandaVT said:

Yep - it's in poor taste, but it doesn't seem like it'll suddenly cause two married people to leave their spouses for each other. It would be more of an eye-rolling moment than anything else for me.

It certainly won't make him interested in any of her daughters.  (even if all were single.) He considers his wife to be perfect for him. 

It's one more check in the "she's off" (close your eyes, breathe deep, and count to ten) column.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people want to have such awkward conversations is beyond me. 

I've been the subject on one of those conversations, so glad it didn't happen again. Also so glad my friend shut it down with "My son had a shot and he $%$# up. I'd like this conversation to be over because it's a sore spot for me." 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s clearly other baggage or history here, because to me it reads as an innocuous compliment.  The idea that it’s implying anything about his actual marriage or her sons-in-law seems to be reading a whole lot more into it than would be warranted in a normal conversation.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, fraidycat said:

My thoughts are that it was on offhand comment that should go in one ear and out the other. Any time and energy wasted thinking about it at all is making a mountain out of a molehill.

Yup.  Eyes on your own paper has been good advice since kindergarten.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My honest thoughts? If I had to guess the scenario I’d say the annoying lady made the comment to her sister’s (or close cousin’s) son-in-law and that these women have a tricky history. I’d guess that the poster is the mother of the daughter who is “the right type” and whose daughter was raised to make the better spousal choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2022 at 2:05 AM, gardenmom5 said:

The second.  He makes more money than her sons-in-law.  Possibly as much (or close to) as all three of her sils/husbands combined.  (One she has decided she likes. He's blue collar but works hard and supports his family. two of whom she doesn't have fuzzy feelings.)

But this was said to a relative's HUSBAND.  He was already married to someone else. Like - he shouldn't have chosen who he did.

Nah, I don't read it that way at all. She's just wishing he had been in her closer family circle. I would not take that to mean she's saying his wife is awful but I would be annoyed if I was the wife! Hope that makes sense. 

And it's a really shallow thing to say if the main reason she said it was financial! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, heartlikealion said:

Nah, I don't read it that way at all. She's just wishing he had been in her closer family circle. I would not take that to mean she's saying his wife is awful where do you get that *I* thought that, much less said that? because that's not what I said. It was entirely a commentary on her feelings towards her sons-in-law. (and disrespectful to "the not-her-daughter wife".)  but I would be annoyed if I was the wife! Hope that makes sense. 

And it's a really shallow thing to say if the main reason she said it was financial! 

 

who are you saying is shallow? Her - because she thinks two of her sons-in-law are beneath her daughters because they don't make enough money? Her daughters chose them.  And yeah - I've heard the comments from her in so many words.  - or that it took her awhile to get over her "dissatisfaction" with her now "favorite" son-in-law because he is a blue collar worker?  (he rolls his eyes at being called her favorite since he knows her feelings towards the other two)

Or me - because I stated that was the reason? 

I just spent the weekend at her 'favorite' son's-in-law and daughter's house (had a lovely visit.).  They're good parents, and they work hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...