Jump to content

Menu

Banned Books


Recommended Posts

I dislike Banned Books Week. It strikes me as propaganda to promote the idea that reading is an end in itself, not a means to an end (in other words, the "as long as they are reading something" philosophy without regard to the quality or values of what they are reading.)

 

In the first place, most of them seem to end up on reading lists, so they are hardly banned.

 

In the second place, many of them have no other claim to fame and are of such little interest or merit they would never have been read widely in the first place.

 

A book really has to have something more for me to read or assign it than just having been banned somewhere.

Edited by In The Great White North
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We support banned/challenged books week. When my eldest was 5 we chose Eloise in Paris from the banned/challenged books list (it has some line drawings of the Venus de Milo and other works of art with nudity). We still do this, the books have changed. My eldest dd's favorite book is To Kill a Mockingbird. I've also done discussions for homeschooled teens that included banned books such as Heart of Darkness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any banned books these days?

 

I was wondering the same thing.. ? (aside from maybe in certain countries where it's actually illegal to own specific books?)

 

I guess libraries or book stores could choose what they will or will not carry…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dislike Banned Books Week. It's merely propaganda to promote the idea that reading is an end in itself, not a means to an end (in other words, the "as long as they are reading something" philosophy without regard to the quality or values of what they are reading.)

 

In the first place, most of them seem to end up on reading lists, so they are hardly banned.

 

In the second place, many of them have no other claim to fame and are of such little interest or merit they would never have been read widely in the first place.

 

A book really has to have something more for me to read or assign it than just having been banned somewhere.

 

The top ten most frequently challenged list for 2009 includes To Kill a Mockingbird at number four. Forty-six of these "top 100" books have been banned or challenged. They are on a lot of reading lists, which is why they end up challenged a lot. We've had a few moms here who challenged the books their kids were reading as assigned reading in public school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top ten most frequently challenged list for 2009 includes To Kill a Mockingbird at number four. Forty-six of these "top 100" books have been banned or challenged. They are on a lot of reading lists, which is why they end up challenged a lot. We've had a few moms here who challenged the books their kids were reading as assigned reading in public school.

 

Are they really "banned" or was the objection more based on the age group it was assigned to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they really "banned" or was the objection more based on the age group it was assigned to?

 

A percentage of the objections are people objecting to the age group. However, it's worth pointing out that one person's objection doesn't mean that it is actually inappropriate for the age group. There was a giant kerfuffle on the high school board recently because TWTM suggests books such as Gilgamesh for ninth graders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A percentage of the objections are people objecting to the age group. However, it's worth pointing out that one person's objection doesn't mean that it is actually inappropriate for the age group.

 

Given that the charts show six times as many objections from parents as anyone else, I tend to think that the top four reasons (sexually explicit, unsuited to age group, violence, and offensive language) could all have been lumped together under "unsuited to age group."

 

There was a giant kerfuffle on the high school board recently because TWTM suggests books such as Gilgamesh for ninth graders.

 

Not surprising, since we do have a bunch of kids doing grades way above their age. I could see the parents of 11-12 year olds having a problem with Gilgamesh.

 

What they're calling banned books really often comes down to a parent's right to judge what is appropriate for their child, not the schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a printed copy of the most challenged/banned books and I pick books from it pretty regularly. I get the picture books out of hte library for my kids and they've read some of the chapter books.

 

I think "challenged" is a better term now than "banned" in the US. Usually the list details books that have been challenged. I'm slightly more tolerant of the challenges to school reading lists/libraries than I am to the challenges to public libraries. I have almost no patience for challenges to books being placed in public libraries.

 

I've previously seen a list that details where each book on the top 100 list was challenged. The classics list here: http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/frequentlychallenged/challengedclassics/reasonsbanned/index.cfm does detail it for those books, and most of them are challenges from parents on school reading lists/assignments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they're calling banned books really often comes down to a parent's right to judge what is appropriate for their child, not the schools.

I disagree. Parents who request their child read a different book for a school assignment do NOT show up on this list. It only shows up if the book's removal from the library or from a reading list is called for formally. Most schools *and* libraries are very receptive to parents requesting their child not read a book... that's very different from asking for it's removal altogether (thus taking those same rights away from other families).

 

<librarian steps off soap box> :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they're calling banned books really often comes down to a parent's right to judge what is appropriate for their child, not the schools.

 

From the ALA website: Challenges do not simply involve a person expressing a point of view; rather, they are an attempt to remove material from the curriculum or library, thereby restricting the access of others.

 

So, no, we're not talking about a parent telling his or her child not to read a book. We're talking about books that parents and others have tried to have removed from libraries so that no one can read them.

 

It's not the same thing.

 

And, yes, my kids have absolutely read a number of the books on the lists for recent years. In fact, I've assigned a good handful of them.

 

To Kill a Mockingbird? Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that the charts show six times as many objections from parents as anyone else, I tend to think that the top four reasons (sexually explicit, unsuited to age group, violence, and offensive language) could all have been lumped together under "unsuited to age group."

 

 

 

Not surprising, since we do have a bunch of kids doing grades way above their age. I could see the parents of 11-12 year olds having a problem with Gilgamesh.

 

What they're calling banned books really often comes down to a parent's right to judge what is appropriate for their child, not the schools.

 

A parent following TWTM wouldn't have their (early to middle) logic stage child doing beginning rhetoric level work.

 

I disagree. Parents who request their child read a different book for a school assignment do NOT show up on this list. It only shows up if the book's removal from the library or from a reading list is called for formally. Most schools *and* libraries are very receptive to parents requesting their child not read a book... that's very different from asking for it's removal altogether (thus taking those same rights away from other families).

 

<librarian steps off soap box> :)

 

:iagree:

Yeah, what she said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you feel about the Banned Books Week that libraries do? What are some of your favorite banned books? Do you allow your children to read the banned books?

 

I would be interested to hear how you answer this. Sometimes I find myself in total agreement with you, and sometimes I find myself at the polar opposite of the spectrum... but your responses are always thoughtful--and thought-provoking. :001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be interested to hear how you answer this. Sometimes I find myself in total agreement with you, and sometimes I find myself at the polar opposite of the spectrum... but your responses are always thoughtful--and thought-provoking. :001_smile:

 

Aww thanks! I am glad to provoke your thoughts.

 

I think this quote sums it up best for me:

 

Censorship, like charity, should begin at home, but unlike charity, it should end there.

 

 

I actually saw it on a Banned Books poster at the library. As far as my own children, I lean toward less censorship, assuming they are old enough. Right now they are too young for the Banned Books. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprising, since we do have a bunch of kids doing grades way above their age. I could see the parents of 11-12 year olds having a problem with Gilgamesh.

 

My eldest read far above her reading level. I didn't just hand her books off of the rhetoric list as a result. That would have been silly.

 

What they're calling banned books really often comes down to a parent's right to judge what is appropriate for their child, not the schools.

 

Then they should homeschool, not insist on removing a book from the library.

 

A parent following TWTM wouldn't have their (early to middle) logic stage child doing beginning rhetoric level work.

 

 

 

:iagree:

 

Honestly, this forum is the only place I have ever seen people speak positively of Howard Zinn.

 

Where are you from originally? Just curious.

 

Right now they are too young for the Banned Books. :)

 

They are the perfect age for Eloise in Paris. It has been challenged and removed from more than one library.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My eldest read far above her reading level. I didn't just hand her books off of the rhetoric list as a result. That would have been silly.

 

 

 

Then they should homeschool, not insist on removing a book from the library.

 

 

 

:iagree:

 

 

 

Where are you from originally? Just curious.

 

 

 

They are the perfect age for Eloise in Paris. It has been challenged and removed from more than one library.

 

Oh cool, I will have to look into that!

 

My dad is a Marine, so we moved every 3 years or so. But I was born in Maine, and lived in Maine, North Carolina, Okinawa, and Texas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the American Library Association (ALA) website:

 

 

"Banned Books Week (BBW) is an annual event celebrating the freedom to read and the importance of the First Amendment. Held during the last week of September, Banned Books Week highlights the benefits of free and open access to information while drawing attention to the harms of censorship by spotlighting actual or attempted bannings of books across the United States."

We totally support banned/challenged books week & celebrate our freedom to read. Yes, both my dc & I have read various books that have appeard on banned/challenged lists. We discuss the importance of the First Amendment & talk about the impact of banning books/censorship.

 

Here is an interesting map that shows locations of book bans & challenges from 2007 to 2010.

 

BBW10_poster.jpg

 

This. In fact there are a few subject matter items I prefer not to have dd read about. Incest, infanticide, genocide and torture of innocents. Any guess what book I have decided is not appropriate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My eldest read far above her reading level. I didn't just hand her books off of the rhetoric list as a result. That would have been silly.

 

 

:iagree:Sure, DD 14 could have read Gilgamesh (or other rhetoric level books) when she was 10 or 11, but I certainly didn't let her. She did read Gilgamesh this year and it was quite appropriate, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dad is a Marine, so we moved every 3 years or so. But I was born in Maine, and lived in Maine, North Carolina, Okinawa, and Texas.

 

Did you mostly attend DoD schools?

 

Even if you disagree with Howard Zinn, would you *ban* his books from a library (if you've read them, if you haven't, I guess you don't know).

:iagree:Sure, DD 14 could have read Gilgamesh (or other rhetoric level books) when she was 10 or 11, but I certainly didn't let her. She did read Gilgamesh this year and it was quite appropriate, IMO.

 

My dd did Gilgamesh this year. Even some of my most conservative friends did Gilgamesh this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had no idea there is a whole week set aside for banned books.

 

me, neither. And I must really be living under a rock because I didn't know To Kill a Mockingbird or James and the Giant Peach were banned books. Really?? So, yeah, I guess I would let my kids read banned books because DD read James and the Giant Peach back in second grade.

 

The fastest way to get me to read something is to ban it. I tend to rebel against people who want to think for me.

 

:iagree:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you mostly attend DoD schools?

 

Even if you disagree with Howard Zinn, would you *ban* his books from a library (if you've read them, if you haven't, I guess you don't know).

 

 

My dd did Gilgamesh this year. Even some of my most conservative friends did Gilgamesh this year.

 

I wouldn't ban his books from a library, no.

I went to one DoD school, in Okinawa. My mom currently teaches at a different DoD school there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are they banned from? It's not like people have to go to the black market to buy any of these books:confused:. Even if parents had them removed from school libraries people could still read them, and buy them. Also why is the Bible not on this so called banned list, because I'm positive that it has been banned from every public school.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are they banned from? It's not like people have to go to the black market to buy any of these books:confused:. Even if parents had them removed from school libraries people could still read them, and buy them. Also why is the Bible not on this so called banned list, because I'm positive that it has been banned from every public school.;)

 

Well, they could rename it Challenged and Restricted Books Week, but that lacks flair ;)

 

The bible as literature is not banned from American public schools. Excerpts are often included in English textbooks; I just opened one of the Elements of Literature series, and it has the tale of the prodigal son, and something else I can't quite remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are they banned from? It's not like people have to go to the black market to buy any of these books:confused:. Even if parents had them removed from school libraries people could still read them, and buy them. Also why is the Bible not on this so called banned list, because I'm positive that it has been banned from every public school.;)

 

Sorry if I've misread your smiley, but in case you're serious. . . the Bible is not banned from school libraries. I have no doubt that if you walked into any public school library in your area you'd find many.

 

In case I've completely misunderstood, my apologies :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dislike Banned Books Week. It strikes me as propaganda to promote the idea that reading is an end in itself, not a means to an end (in other words, the "as long as they are reading something" philosophy without regard to the quality or values of what they are reading.)

 

In the first place, most of them seem to end up on reading lists, so they are hardly banned.

 

In the second place, many of them have no other claim to fame and are of such little interest or merit they would never have been read widely in the first place.

 

A book really has to have something more for me to read or assign it than just having been banned somewhere.

 

:iagree:

It seems stupid and only something bored Americans would come up with because we have nothing better to do with our time.

 

All those books are at B&N or Amazon, not very difficult to find or even very expensive. They've been readily available for as long as I can remember, so even if there was a big issue to keep them in print, it's ridiculous to keep promoting that they are on a banned list now.

 

A lot of those on the list have even been made into movies. I just don't understand how being banned means they are banned...When some one or something is "banned", generally speaking they are simply not allowed.

Edited by jadedone80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:iagree:

It seems stupid and only something bored Americans would come up with because we have nothing better to do with our time.

 

All those books are at B&N or Amazon, not very difficult to find or even very expensive. They've been readily available for as long as I can remember, so even if there was a big issue to keep them in print, it's ridiculous to keep saying that they are on a banned list now.

 

A lot of those on the list have even been made into movies. I just don't understand how being banned means they are banned...When some one or something is "banned", generally speaking they are simply not allowed.

 

They're books that people have lobbied (often successfully) for the removal of from libraries or schools in their communities. We make a point of reading & discussing them as a way of celebrating our freedom to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're books that people have lobbied (often successfully) for the removal of from libraries or schools in their communities. We make a point of reading & discussing them as a way of celebrating our freedom to do so.

 

But sometimes one thing might be good for one community, but not for another....? Why so personal about it? We don't have many drag queens here, but I've heard there are a lot in San Francisco. When the "born this way" campaign came here, people were outraged rather than pleased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But sometimes one thing might be good for one community, but not for another....? Why do you have to involve yourself?

 

Obviously we're not traveling to places who have banned these books and picketing or anything. I said celebrating the fact that we CAN read them-- not forcing anyone else to read them.

 

That said, I disagree that censorship is ever the right answer for an entire community. I think all books should be available in public libraries and all age-appropriate material should be available in public school libraries & that individuals and families should determine for themselves what they/their children can/should read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But sometimes one thing might be good for one community, but not for another....? Why so personal about it? We don't have many drag queens here, but I've heard there are a lot in San Francisco. When the "born this way" campaign came here, people were outraged rather than pleased.

 

Eloise is Paris. Really? Hardly Lady Gaga.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But sometimes one thing might be good for one community, but not for another....? Why so personal about it? We don't have many drag queens here, but I've heard there are a lot in San Francisco. When the "born this way" campaign came here, people were outraged rather than pleased.

 

Not sure why the edit... as though you wish to compare JD Salinger to a parade of drag queens, but as I said-- I'm not parading through the streets throwing To Kill a Mockingbird at people....

 

Although.... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why the edit... as though you wish to compare JD Salinger to a parade of drag queens, but as I said-- I'm not parading through the streets throwing To Kill a Mockingbird at people....

 

Although.... :D

 

Edited to change wording from "why do you have to involve yourself" to "why so personal about it"...just seemed more polite and I wasn't trying to be rude to begin with. :)

 

I've been so annoyed lately with the things that people embrace as a personal interest when it has absolutely nothing to do with them, really. If a community finds something inappropriate for itself, then it's the communities decision. If no is getting hurt and one does not live there, then it shouldn't be such a big, personal ordeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus, I had a friend that was all about reading the banned/censored books, who was also a very active member of the ACLU. You can only *imagine* the arguments we got into, being that she was a suburbanite, Caucasian born American that had never left the country, but consistently complained about all that was wrong with our government here in the US.

 

I guess reading this thread reminds me of her and they were not happy times. lol! I should move on to something more light...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...