Jump to content

Menu

Oxford drops the comma


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Dulcimeramy

It is up to us to pick up the dropped flag and carry it ourselves, Tangerine.

 

I will never, ever, ever give up the Oxford comma.

 

Wine, women, and song. That looks right.

 

Wine, women and song. That looks like it is missing a comma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an old journalist, I say:

 

:hurray:

 

 

Even my son, 7 at the time, pointed out how redundant the Oxford comma is. In a list of items, the comma takes the place of the word "and" so using a comma and the word is like saying, "and and."

 

And now I'm :auto:

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is up to us to pick up the dropped flag and carry it ourselves, Tangerine.

 

I will never, ever, ever give up the Oxford comma.

 

Wine, women, and song. That looks right.

 

Wine, women and song. That looks like it is missing a comma.

 

:iagree:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is up to us to pick up the dropped flag and carry it ourselves, Tangerine.

 

I will never, ever, ever give up the Oxford comma.

 

Wine, women, and song. That looks right.

 

Wine, women and song. That looks like it is missing a comma.

 

:lol: I'm with you.

 

"Will you join in our crusade?

Who will be strong and stand with me?"

 

I may just sing that every time I use the comma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is up to us to pick up the dropped flag and carry it ourselves, Tangerine.

 

I will never, ever, ever give up the Oxford comma.

 

Wine, women, and song. That looks right.

 

Wine, women and song. That looks like it is missing a comma.

 

I agree. This is perplexing, confusing, and wrong.

 

My son actually had a couple points taken off a college paper for using it back in the fall. I told him to tell her either way was acceptable (I think he decided arguing with his English prof. was a bad idea.). I guess she was "old school".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pro-Oxford comma. It just doesn't look right without one. That is all. :001_smile:

 

It'll be interesting to see if this turns out to be a heated and controversial thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't do it. I need my serial commas! All of them.

 

We did use a grammar program (can't recall which one it was) a few years ago that taught it was optional to place a comma before the "and" in a series. I ignored that :glare:.

 

Commas, parentheses, and exclamation marks are some of my favorite writing tools! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you kidding me?!

I FINALLY got the habit of using that one in English in the past year, it has nearly become "okay" to me, I almost got used to it and almost got convinced of its inner logic - and now they CANCEL it?! :mad:

 

All my effort in vain. Sigh.

I knew I should have trusted my initial dislike of that comma and I never should have tried to adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an old journalist, I say:

 

:hurray:

 

 

Even my son, 7 at the time, pointed out how redundant the Oxford comma is. In a list of items, the comma takes the place of the word "and" so using a comma and the word is like saying, "and and."

 

And now I'm :auto:

:D

 

MLA dropped the comma to save INK. I think subjecting grammar rules to the Almighty Dollar is...well, terrible.

 

When I first learned this comma, the English teacher taught us both ways & she said it generally didn't matter which you chose UNLESS it's a legal situation:

 

Jim, Sue, and Bob inherit $300. Each one gets $100.

 

Jim, Sue and Bob inherit $300. Jim gets $150; Sue and Bob get $50 ea.

 

That clenched it for me. If I didn't mean for the last two items in my list to share a metaphorical inheritance, I used the comma (unless writing for the newspaper). It's essential. It has *meaning.*

 

ETA: Commas don't mean "and"! :lol: "John, Abby went to the store" means, "Hey, John! Abby went to the store!" Totally different from the concept of the two of them going to the store together. Commas *never* mean and!! :D

Edited by Aubrey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dulcimeramy
:lol: I'm with you.

 

"Will you join in our crusade?

Who will be strong and stand with me?"

 

I may just sing that every time I use the comma.

 

:lol: We need a song, a flag, and a spokesperson.

 

This is perplexing, confusing, and wrong.

 

 

:lol:

 

 

Commas, parentheses, and exclamation marks are some of my favorite writing tools! ;)

 

:lol:

 

You are all killing me. We should proclaim an Oxford Comma day during which no one may post anything without using it at least once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far it looks like most of us are not going to give up on the Oxford Comma and the discussions are still pretty civil. I'm going to stand by with pictures of kilts just in case this thread takes a turn for the worse though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dulcimeramy
MLA dropped the comma to save INK. I think subjecting grammar rules to the Almighty Dollar is...well, terrible.

 

 

 

You have got to be kidding me!!!! They didn't even offer to take up a collection? The Comma Ink fund?! I would have donated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well no wonder I can't remember which way it should be! I think "comma to replace and." Then the lists I write in sentences look wrong without it.

 

(I'm a Visual Learner who now has to figure out how to teach spelling & grammar)

Edited by lcelmer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dulcimeramy
So far it looks like most of us are not going to give up on the Oxford Comma and the discussions are still pretty civil. I'm going to stand by with pictures of kilts just in case this thread takes a turn for the worse though.

 

I'll come back and argue the other side later if no one else shows up to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I first learned this comma, the English teacher taught us both ways & she said it generally didn't matter which you chose UNLESS it's a legal situation:

 

Jim, Sue, and Bob inherit $300. Each one gets $100.

 

Jim, Sue and Bob inherit $300. Jim gets $150; Sue and Bob get $50 ea.

 

That clenched it for me. If I didn't mean for the last two items in my list to share a metaphorical inheritance, I used the comma (unless writing for the newspaper). It's essential. It has *meaning.*

 

 

I'm going with this argument... Thanks for sharing!

 

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is up to us to pick up the dropped flag and carry it ourselves, Tangerine.

 

I will never, ever, ever give up the Oxford comma.

 

Wine, women, and song. That looks right.

 

Wine, women and song. That looks like it is missing a comma.

 

Count me in! I will help carry the flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was taught not to use it (Abeka in the 90's) and since I've started coming here, I've started using it. How am I ever supposed to teach my kids?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dh and I argued about this awhile ago. We came to the conclusion that in non-academic writings, you do NOT use the comma. But in academic writings, you use the comma because only the academics seemed to realize it existed.

 

So, in my normal writing, I use it or not, as I feel led...but when I wrote my papers, I always used it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you kidding me?!

I FINALLY got the habit of using that one in English in the past year, it has nearly become "okay" to me, I almost got used to it and almost got convinced of its inner logic - and now they CANCEL it?! :mad:

 

All my effort in vain. Sigh.

I knew I should have trusted my initial dislike of that comma and I never should have tried to adjust.

 

Others apart sat on a Hill retir'd,

In thoughts more elevate, and reason'd high

Of Providence, Foreknowledge, Will, and Fate,

Fixt Fate, free will, foreknowledge absolute,

And found no end, in wand'ring mazes lost.

 

~ John Milton (Paradise Lost)

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my youth I learned to always use that final comma. I liked the rule because I felt it avoided ambiguousness. Later I learned the new rule that it was OK to drop the comma when all items in the list were single words. The moment you use a two or more word phrase that comma was right back in there. That is the compromise I reluctantly followed with the physicians whose academic papers I used to edit in my old life.

 

I'm also the person who still puts two spaces between sentences when typing.

 

Once all y'all get that flag designed, I will raise it with pride!

(and yes "all y'all" is the plural of "y'all" around these parts ;) )

 

Pam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dh and I argued about this awhile ago. We came to the conclusion that in non-academic writings, you do NOT use the comma. But in academic writings, you use the comma because only the academics seemed to realize it existed.

 

So, in my normal writing, I use it or not, as I feel led...but when I wrote my papers, I always used it.

 

That depends on the field. English/lit uses it. Psych does not. Hist depts follow Chicago style, but I can't remember if that includes the comma or not.

 

Personally, I think when it comes to matters of psychology, we should look to the psych dept (imagine if the English dept tried to tell dr's how to treat psychosis!), & when it comes to grammar, we should look to the English dept. It's only right & fair! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an old journalist, I say:

 

:hurray:

 

 

Even my son, 7 at the time, pointed out how redundant the Oxford comma is. In a list of items, the comma takes the place of the word "and" so using a comma and the word is like saying, "and and."

 

And now I'm :auto:

:D

 

 

:iagree: It is not often that I agree with abandoning any grammatical conventions, but this one is long overdue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh. Sadly, I'm not surprised--can't remember where it came up or if I read it or a younger person said that's what they learned, but it has been taught prior to this. I will never give it up. It just makes sense. As for Oxford...well, after the OED adds OMG, what's a little comma?? Uffda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Others apart sat on a Hill retir'd,

In thoughts more elevate, and reason'd high

Of Providence, Foreknowledge, Will, and Fate,

Fixt Fate, free will, foreknowledge absolute,

And found no end, in wand'ring mazes lost.

 

~ John Milton (Paradise Lost)

 

Bill

Milton is :001_wub:, but the "logic" of that comma has always escaped me; not that I was inaware of its existence, but it has always been awkward for me. It just makes no sense to put it there, really (we are stingy with commas in my language :tongue_smilie:). And then I tried to go against my intuition and put it. And I ALMOST got to the point where I can put it and feel "normal" with the fact I put it. And then they cancel it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dulcimeramy
In my youth I learned to always use that final comma. I liked the rule because I felt it avoided ambiguousness. Later I learned the new rule that it was OK to drop the comma when all items in the list were single words. The moment you use a two or more word phrase that comma was right back in there. That is the compromise I reluctantly followed with the physicians whose academic papers I used to edit in my old life.

 

I'm also the person who still puts two spaces between sentences when typing.

 

Once all y'all get that flag designed, I will raise it with pride!

(and yes "all y'all" is the plural of "y'all" around these parts ;) )

 

Pam

 

I put the two spaces, too. I can't help it. I just typed sooooo many sentences on old Remingtons under the old rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will never give that comma up!

 

If this sentence does not make a strong case for the serial comma...nothing does:

 

My Parents, Batman and Robin will be at the party. Umm...NO!

My Parents, Batman, and Robin will be at the party. Much better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dulcimeramy

I always thought it was logical because we speak with a pause at each of those places. Of course, my people are all from Indiana and Kentucky. We might think more slowly than some folks.

 

It would seem that quick-witted people might NOT need an Oxford comma when they speak, because once they have settled on the first two items in the list the third has long since suggested itself.

 

Some of us are still processing well into the speaking of the second item and require a pause before stating the third.

Edited by Dulcimeramy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLA dropped the comma to save INK. I think subjecting grammar rules to the Almighty Dollar is...well, terrible.

 

When I first learned this comma, the English teacher taught us both ways & she said it generally didn't matter which you chose UNLESS it's a legal situation:

 

Jim, Sue, and Bob inherit $300. Each one gets $100.

 

Jim, Sue and Bob inherit $300. Jim gets $150; Sue and Bob get $50 ea.

 

That clenched it for me. If I didn't mean for the last two items in my list to share a metaphorical inheritance, I used the comma (unless writing for the newspaper). It's essential. It has *meaning.*

 

ETA: Commas don't mean "and"! :lol: "John, Abby went to the store" means, "Hey, John! Abby went to the store!" Totally different from the concept of the two of them going to the store together. Commas *never* mean and!! :D

 

I will never give that comma up!

 

If this sentence does not make a strong case for the serial comma...nothing does:

 

My Parents, Batman and Robin will be at the party. Umm...NO!

My Parents, Batman, and Robin will be at the party. Much better!

 

I will not give up that comma. To me not having it changes the meaning of the sentence just as the above two quotes show.

 

The only thing I find fault with is that in Aubrey's example I believe in the second sentence John would get $150, with Bob and Sue each getting $75 of that inheritance, not $50, unless the lawyer reading the will absconded with the last $50. :tongue_smilie:

Sorry, I couldn't help it, my inner smart a$$ came out there.

 

Now in Wagswife's quote I agree that the first sentence makes it look a bit like your parents are Batman and Robin, but adding a comma in another spot would truly clear up the dilemma.

My Parents, Batman and Robin, will be at the party. Holy Cool Parents Batman!

 

Sorry, I couldn't help it, my inner smart a$$ came out there.

Edited by nukeswife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my youth I learned to always use that final comma. I liked the rule because I felt it avoided ambiguousness. Later I learned the new rule that it was OK to drop the comma when all items in the list were single words. The moment you use a two or more word phrase that comma was right back in there. That is the compromise I reluctantly followed with the physicians whose academic papers I used to edit in my old life.

 

I'm also the person who still puts two spaces between sentences when typing.

 

Once all y'all get that flag designed, I will raise it with pride!

(and yes "all y'all" is the plural of "y'all" around these parts ;) )

 

Pam

 

:iagree: I won't give that up either!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far it looks like most of us are not going to give up on the Oxford Comma and the discussions are still pretty civil. I'm going to stand by with pictures of kilts just in case this thread takes a turn for the worse though.

 

You do that. :thumbup1:

 

(You meant "men in kilts" right?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was logical because we speak with a pause at each of those places. Of course, my people are all from Indiana and Kentucky. We might think more slowly than some folks.

 

It would seem that quick-witted people might NOT need an Oxford comma when they speak, because once they have settled on the first two items in the list the third has long since suggested itself.

 

Some of us are still processing well into the speaking of the second item and require a pause before stating the third.

 

Exactly! (And, I'm not even from Indiana or Kentucky) :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then they cancel it.

 

"They" is just the Oxford University Public Affairs department; this is *not* Oxford University Press, by the way. (Not that we have to do what they dictate anyway!)

Plus, has anyone read any British newspapers recently? I find it highly upsetting! :D Dropping the ending comma after a ... hmm, what is it called? a nominative appositive? ... is rampant. British newspapers, even the Times, are full of sentences such as

 

Barack Obama, president of the United States said today that ...

:glare::tongue_smilie:

 

Maybe they're saving ink there too ...? or just sloppy sloppy sloppy.

 

Sometimes the serial comma is confusing:

 

Sue, my sister, and I went to the beach.

 

Did three or two people go to the beach? So ... after working at an Ivy League university press for many years, where the serial comma was house style, I usually use it, but not when it leads to confusion.

 

~Laura

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Milton is :001_wub:, but the "logic" of that comma has always escaped me; not that I was inaware of its existence, but it has always been awkward for me. It just makes no sense to put it there, really (we are stingy with commas in my language :tongue_smilie:). And then I tried to go against my intuition and put it. And I ALMOST got to the point where I can put it and feel "normal" with the fact I put it. And then they cancel it.

 

See post below.

 

To me, the comma in a list means "pause"--and I still want that pause if there is an and. I'll keep using it.

 

The "logic" of the comma is that it clues the reader to the beat of the language, specifically it indicates a slight pause.

 

In the sentence: "He enjoyed a breakfast of ham and eggs" there would not be a pause between "ham" and "eggs." But were the sentence : "He enjoyed a breakfast of ham, porridge, and eggs there would be slight pauses where there are commas. To write: "He enjoyed a breakfast of ham, porridge and eggs" would not reflect how one ought to read the line. And ultimately punctuation should serve readability (as well as clarity of thought).

 

Bill

Edited by Spy Car
Sometimes I really hate auto-correct
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLA dropped the comma to save INK. I think subjecting grammar rules to the Almighty Dollar is...well, terrible.

 

When I first learned this comma, the English teacher taught us both ways & she said it generally didn't matter which you chose UNLESS it's a legal situation:

 

Jim, Sue, and Bob inherit $300. Each one gets $100.

 

Jim, Sue and Bob inherit $300. Jim gets $150; Sue and Bob get $50 ea.

 

That clenched it for me. If I didn't mean for the last two items in my list to share a metaphorical inheritance, I used the comma (unless writing for the newspaper). It's essential. It has *meaning.*

 

ETA: Commas don't mean "and"! :lol: "John, Abby went to the store" means, "Hey, John! Abby went to the store!" Totally different from the concept of the two of them going to the store together. Commas *never* mean and!! :D

Exactly!

Is it sad that I didn't even know what an oxford comma was? I THINK I was taught not to use one. The comma does not look right to me.

I drink water, coke and tea. That looks right.

I drink water, coke, and tea. That doesn't. hmmmm.

To me it looks like you drink two different kinds of drinks. You drink water. You mix your coke and tea for a drink.

 

I put the two spaces, too. I can't help it. I just typed sooooo many sentences on old Remingtons under the old rule.

Yes! Two spaces!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"They" is just the Oxford University Public Affairs department; this is *not* Oxford University Press, by the way. (Not that we have to do what they dictate anyway!)

Plus, has anyone read any British newspapers recently? I find it highly upsetting! :D Dropping the ending comma after a ... hmm, what is it called? a nominative appositive? ... is rampant. British newspapers, even the Times, are full of sentences such as

 

Barack Obama, president of the United States said today that ...

:glare::tongue_smilie:

 

Maybe they're saving ink there too ...? or just sloppy sloppy sloppy.

 

Sometimes the serial comma is confusing:

 

Sue, my sister, and I went to the beach.

 

Did three or two people go to the beach? So ... after working at an Ivy League university press for many years, where the serial comma was house style, I usually use it, but not when it leads to confusion.

 

~Laura

 

But you can't say: "Sue, my sister and I went to the beach," either--again, THAT means, "Hey, Sue! My sister and I went to the beach!"

 

So the whole thing would need to be rephrased: "My sister, Sue, went to the beach with me." Of course, if a comma meant "and" then this would still be confusing. ;)

 

There are plenty of times when writing is unclear, with or without proper punctuation. There's no reason to blame that on the comma! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...