Jump to content

Menu

(English) Language Usage Question


Carrie12345
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’ve only noticed this recently, through things like YouTube and TikTok, and it’s actually making me *more nutty the more I hear it, rather than less, probably because I can’t figure out the WHY! Most regional or cultural language differences feel, to me, like they have an obvious reason/root/logic, but here I’m stumped.

It’s using “whenever” instead of “when”.

I’ve been on message boards and groups with people all over the country and world for more than 20 years and have never noticed this in print, only in strangers recording themselves speaking.

”Whenever I graduated,” “And then whenever we got married,” “Story about the details of the day, including whenever my alarm went off, and then whenever I got to work” … Things with actual, known places in time. Not an unknown “Oh, whenever that might have been” or multiple occurrences like “Whenever I eat too much cheese.”

Why?! Someone please tell me why so I can find a way to get over it!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven’t noticed this yet but I am laughing because I’m slowly getting out the door to work. I’m actually in the office this year, but arrival times have been variable for all my coworkers. Whenever we get there…

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's the new word usage of the month, similar to "literally" not actually meaning literally, instead meaning "figuratively." As in, "I literally sh*t my pants, I was so scared." Which translates as, "I didn't actually poop in my pants because that would be gross, I was really scared but I need some sort of visual that expresses how strong the feeling was, and literally sounds really strong." Which literally means that they have no idea what 'literally' means.

 

 

Edited by wintermom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bibiche said:

@Carrie12345 My phone often changes when to whenever, no idea why. Have you heard anyone say it or just read it? Maybe it’s not a thing. Maybe the phones are trying to change language patterns. 🤖 🤖 🤖 

I literally said 😉 😆 I’ve never seen it in print.
But this turns out to be a popular topic on Reddit. Still no answer, lol.

I did see a better example there than mine to demonstrate the usage for those who haven’t heard it. “Whenever I was a child…” Like, “Whenever I was a child, I had my own room.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Carrie12345 said:

I literally said 😉 😆 I’ve never seen it in print.

D’oh. Indeed you did. I am *literally* dying of embarrassment because of my poor reading comprehension skills now. 😂 💀 😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something like "could care less" is really different to me because it's a well established phrase. "Whenever I did that thing that happened at a specific time" is a new one on me, so it chafes a bit just because it seems mildly confusing. Like, "Whenever you had the baby you're holding? Surely you KNOW when you had the baby. It's not the sort of thing you just forget."

But... language evolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This misuse of 'whenever' reminds me of my French classes in high school and past tenses.

Whenever I was doing abc, xyz happened.  This  is past imperfect, isn't it? The first action was not completed, so the verb tense is passe imparfait.

When I did abc, I enjoyed myself.  The first action was completed, so the verb tense is passe complete. (or something like that, I can't remember the exact French word and I'm not chasing up accents.)

Edited by wintermom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jean in Newcastle said:

I would assume (perhaps incorrectly) that they were trying to sound more erudite by using the longer word. But of course they failed. 

...but failed because they didn't know what erudite actually means.

P.S. I had to look it up. 😅

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wintermom, the use of the word "literally" as an intensifier has been widespread in English for over 300 years. It has existed in that form, in that usage, for as long as it has had its figurative meaning of "true, real". (The original definition, of course, is "of or relating to letters".) You can confirm this by looking it up in a dictionary.

When we say a word such as literally, really, or very is an intensifier, we do not mean that it means "figuratively". An intensifier is simply a word that modifies a statement to make it stronger.

Many words that might seem to mean "this is true, not figurative" are intensifiers in English. It is curious to me that people rail against "literally" but not against the exact same usage of "really". When I say my mother really exploded - well, that is no more real than it is literal. I am not picking pieces of Mom-Bomb off the ground. I simply mean she was angry, and I am using an intensifier to emphasize that statement. Likewise, if I say "I honestly just about died laughing", nobody thinks I had a serious medical emergency due to laughter. They think I laughed very hard.

You cannot replace the words "literally" or "really" or any other intensifiers with the word "figuratively" and retain the same meaning, because those words do not mean the same thing and are not used in the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

skimomma, "could care less" has been around and rising since at least the 1970s: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=could+care+less%2Ccouldn't+care+less&year_start=1930&year_end=2019&corpus=28&smoothing=3

It only appeared about a generation after the first written citation of "couldn't care less / could not care less".

As the phrase is common in colloquial speech, it makes sense that it would also be common in popular music, which often is written in a casual, colloquial style.

You and Carrie are making the same mistake, albeit in slightly different forms. You are attempting to understand a fixed expression by looking at the component pieces and adding them up. She is attempting to understand a language change in the same way. You're both trying to apply logic. This is a critical error. It never works.

Edited by Tanaqui
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. It might work for other things, but honestly, it doesn't work for this! Wintermom is doing yet a third variation on the same basic error - she doesn't like a usage, she's been told it's wrong, so she's using logic to work out why it must be wrong while ignoring the fact that the same logic could be used on plenty of words that she probably never thought of - "really" is just the tip of the iceberg here. Many widespread intensifiers in English that aren't tagged by listeners as (often regional) slang (such as "wicked", "hella", "mad") have their etymological origins in "truth", and usually those origins aren't exactly well-hidden. About the only one I can think of where your average speaker probably couldn't work it out just by thinking for a minute is "very", and even that, once it's pointed out, is clearly connected to "veracity" and "verify".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes I use whenever instead of when on an event that technically I should know the date and time of it's happening to impart the feeling that the when is fuzzy in my mind. 

For example, say "whenever I had the baby" sure I have my kids' birth certificates and clearly, I was present for the event, but I was pretty foggy at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...