Guest lahmeh Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 My dh and I were taught this way: hook, line and sinker. GWG is teaching my dc this way: hook, line, and sinker. Which is right? Please vote. TIA :confused: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lily_Grace Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 That would be the Oxford comma (or serial comma). Both ways are correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmos Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I support the Oxford comma. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TracyP Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I was taught the same way as you and your dh were. I am teaching my kids the GWG way. That seems to be the more common way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skueppers Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Putting the comma before the "and" seems to be the most correct current usage, although both are acceptable. I was taught not to put a comma in that position, but have long thought putting a comma before the "and" made more sense. I recently investigated and found that most style guides now recommend the comma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wy_kid_wrangler04 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 My dh and I were taught this way: hook, line and sinker. GWG is teaching my dc this way: hook, line, and sinker. Which is right? Please vote. TIA :confused: I am going through this same thing. Dh and I were both taught hook, line and sinker but our grammar also teaches hook, line, and sinker. The second just looks wrong to me because of how I was taught. I am really struggling to teach my daughter the way her book teaches it. :glare: I voted for the way I learned because that HAS to be right :lol: I asked a question similar to this but it was a year or two ago. I don't remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoneyFernDotOrg Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 That would be the Oxford comma (or serial comma). Both ways are correct. They are, but there was an article in January about Oxford dropping it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuzor Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I am going through this same thing. Dh and I were both taught hook, line and sinker but our grammar also teaches hook, line, and sinker. The second just looks wrong to me because of how I was taught. I am really struggling to teach my daughter the way her book teaches it. :glare: I voted for the way I learned because that HAS to be right :lol: I asked a question similar to this but it was a year or two ago. I don't remember. I agree. I just struggle placing the comma prior to and. Seems so wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIch elle Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 They are, but there was an article in January about Oxford dropping it. Umff! :001_huh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuzor Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 They are, but there was an article in January about Oxford dropping it. Thanks good to know. This post sounds like a conversation that would be perfect for NPR's show A Way With Words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazyforlatin Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I love the Oxford comma and have taught it to DD, but I did notice in some books, like Redwall, that it has been dropped. ETA: I can't believe I just wrote that I love the Oxford comma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamaSheep Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I'm a big fan of the Oxford comma, even though several English teachers tried to drill it out of me. Here's why: http://pinterest.com/pin/160304359/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Wife Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Using the Oxford comma reduces the chance for confusion (e.g. Eats, Shoots and Leaves). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChandlerMom Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I use the optional comma -- it's a STYLE thing more than a correct thing. When I write journal papers for work I always omit it else the copy editors will delete it for me. In journals you won't see it since it takes an extra space. Each journal has it's own style sheet...you must comply. :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usetoschool Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I'm a big fan of the Oxford comma, even though several English teachers tried to drill it out of me. Here's why: http://pinterest.com/pin/160304359/ :lol: I was just coming to post that. Using the Oxford comma reduces the chance for confusion (e.g. Eats, Shoots and Leaves). :iagree: and we really like that book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenjenn Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I use the optional comma because of the way I speak. If I am speaking, more often than not I pause. I actually SAY "Red, white, and blue." I actually pause after white. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MicheleinMN Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Using the Oxford comma reduces the chance for confusion (e.g. Eats, Shoots and Leaves). :iagree::iagree::iagree: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Mom Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I was taught the second way, but understand the first to be correct as well. I did not vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angela in ohio Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I teach my dc that whichever way their teacher, professor, or boss does it is the correct way for that situation. :D I prefer it (actually, my feelings are a bit stronger than that :D,) so they use it for my assignments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grover Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 They're both correct. The article about dropping the Oxford comma was a hoax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daisy Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I'm not giving up the Oxford comma. I think it is better to have it and be clear then drop it and confuse everyone. I divided my inheritance between Phil, John, Peter and Mary. Did I divide my inheritance three ways or four? The Oxford comma would have cleared it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vida Winter Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I don't use the comma before the and. I hate it when they change things. I also dislike that there are different names for the same grammar term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tam101 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 My dh and I were taught this way: hook, line and sinker. GWG is teaching my dc this way: hook, line, and sinker. Which is right? Please vote. TIA :confused: I was taught that the comma before 'and' is optional. FLL teaches to put a comma there, so that is what I have my son do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamaJo Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 The second is the preferred way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrself Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I use the optional comma because of the way I speak. If I am speaking, more often than not I pause. I actually SAY "Red, white, and blue." I actually pause after white. I was taught that either is correct - JUST be consistent about it. However, I'd have to agree with Jenn. A comma signifies a pause. And I pause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krista in LA Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I was taught that either way was acceptable, but I always preferred the additional comma. If you read it out loud, you naturally pause there, so it seems to make more sense to use it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regentrude Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 The Oxford comma is a matter of much debate, and, ultimately, taste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycalling Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I'm not giving up the Oxford comma. I think it is better to have it and be clear then drop it and confuse everyone. I divided my inheritance between Phil, John, Peter and Mary. Did I divide my inheritance three ways or four? The Oxford comma would have cleared it up. :iagree:This is why I always use it. So much clearer, imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgehogs4 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Both are correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mothersweets Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I'm not giving up the Oxford comma. I think it is better to have it and be clear then drop it and confuse everyone. I divided my inheritance between Phil, John, Peter and Mary. Did I divide my inheritance three ways or four? The Oxford comma would have cleared it up. :iagree:Great example! I'm a believer in the Oxford comma. Also, I believe there was a thread about this a few months back in the General forum. I'll see if I can find it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mothersweets Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) I found it! Here is the thread about the Oxford comma - pretty interesting! :) The dropping of the Oxford comma was a hoax. Go to post #71 and there is a link explaining the hoax. Oxford Comma thread Edited September 12, 2011 by Mothersweets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rivka Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 The classic example sentence for why one should use the Oxford comma: "I'd like to thank my parents, God and Ayn Rand." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nov05mama Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Using the Oxford comma reduces the chance for confusion (e.g. Eats, Shoots and Leaves). :iagree::iagree: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mommy to monkeys Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 the second one hook, line, and sinker the other looks so wrong. . .even if they're both ok;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spy Car Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 (edited) The Oxford comma is the only acceptable choice. The alternative is an assault on everything that is good and decent in the Universe :D Bill Edited September 13, 2011 by Spy Car Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caitilin Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 The Oxford comma is the only acceptable choice. The alternative is an assault on every thing that is good and decent in the Universe :D Bill Totally agree!:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquinas Academy Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 They are, but there was an article in January about Oxford dropping it. There was a lengthy discussion about that here on the forums. The article turned out to be a hoax. ETA: Sorry, I didn't see Mothersweets post linking the same thread. The Oxford comma is the only acceptable choice. The alternative is an assault on every thing that is good and decent in the Universe :D Bill :iagree::lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ereks mom Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Both are correct. :iagree: although I usually do put a comma before the "and". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lahmeh Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Thank you all so much for responding! :001_smile: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerPoppy Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 The classic example sentence for why one should use the Oxford comma: "I'd like to thank my parents, God and Ayn Rand." Love this; must remember this. Long live the Oxford comma! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIch elle Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 I love the Oxford comma and have taught it to DD, but I did notice in some books, like Redwall, that it has been dropped. ETA: I can't believe I just wrote that I love the Oxford comma. I've noticed it's also dropped in the newspaper too (Boston Globe). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmos Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 (edited) Using the Oxford comma reduces the chance for confusion (e.g. Eats, Shoots and Leaves). While I am in the pro-Oxford-comma camp, I disagree that the Oxford comma reduces confusion in this case. As long as there is a comma after eats, it is perfectly clear that the panda eats and shoots (a gun) and leaves (the room). In the book of that title, the confusion is between these two sentences: The panda eats shoots and leaves. The panda eats, shoots, and leaves. I don't recall whether she used the Oxford comma or not. It's immaterial, because it's the first comma (or lack thereof) which causes confusion. The classic example sentence for why one should use the Oxford comma: "I'd like to thank my parents, God and Ayn Rand." This is a case where the Oxford comma is necessary. Is the speaker thanking God and Ayn Rand or addressing them. ETA: Good grief, I sound pedantic in this post. I think I need a restraining order from grammar threads. Edited September 13, 2011 by Cosmos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.