Jump to content

Menu

It looks like we'll never know what happened to missing mom Susan Powell


Laurie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do believe there is a hell.   he was sick and twisted, and warped his children.  (except for jennifer - the only one who grew up with their mother.)

he was never going to talk.  he liked the power.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who didn't follow it.  Josh had been ordered to have a psychosexual evaluation. And the boys were starting to talk about what happened that night.  He only had supervised visitation.

 

He was a control freak.  

 

The really sad thing is her bishop and others in Utah tried to get her to leave. And offered to pay her way so she could.  She was too afraid of what he'd do if she did.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve always been appalled he was awarded even those supervised visits.  At most they should have required him to come to the DSHS office to have a supervised visit in a controlled environment where he couldn’t have killed them.  Or how about this?  Not make these kids visit someone who probably killed their mother.  Imagine a world where the kids come first.  

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LucyStoner said:

I’ve always been appalled he was awarded even those supervised visits.  At most they should have required him to come to the DSHS office to have a supervised visit in a controlled environment where he couldn’t have killed them.  Or how about this?  Not make these kids visit someone who probably killed their mother.  Imagine a world where the kids come first.  

 

It will require constitutional changes to give children rights.  Right now from a legal perspective children are their parents property. Unless there was evidence of child abuse that could not be overcome, he unfortunately had constitutional rights for the state to not interfere. The constitution is the single most frustrating part of foster care.  Once some threshold of states interfering with parenting has been met, people should start doing what is in the best interest of the child.  We've had SO MANY social workers tell us that after a case was resolved they were privately pulling for whatever we all thought was best for a child, but at the time their hands and mouths were tied by the law.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Katy said:

 

It will require constitutional changes to give children rights.  Right now from a legal perspective children are their parents property. Unless there was evidence of child abuse that could not be overcome, he unfortunately had constitutional rights for the state to not interfere. The constitution is the single most frustrating part of foster care.  Once some threshold of states interfering with parenting has been met, people should start doing what is in the best interest of the child.  We've had SO MANY social workers tell us that after a case was resolved they were privately pulling for whatever we all thought was best for a child, but at the time their hands and mouths were tied by the law.

 

I am well aware of this.  I am also tired, very tired, of seeing the fall out of the primacy of parental rights when it comes to families where the one or both parents have no business being parents. 

Child abuse isn’t a rare or isolated phenomena.  We should be better prepared to deal with it.  We should see the impact that DV has on kids.  We do not, and in our failures we perpetuate the abuse cycle on to future generations.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LucyStoner said:

I’ve always been appalled he was awarded even those supervised visits.  At most they should have required him to come to the DSHS office to have a supervised visit in a controlled environment where he couldn’t have killed them.  Or how about this?  Not make these kids visit someone who probably killed their mother.  Imagine a world where the kids come first.  

 

This is a stunner indeed. We do supervised visits at DHHS for a lot less than violent behavior.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The really sad thing is her bishop and others in Utah tried to get her to leave. And offered to pay her way so she could.  She was too afraid of what he'd do if she did.

 

She was right to be afraid. The most dangerous time to be an abused spouse is the year after they leave. Gambling on staying may have been a mistake, but leaving might not have done any good anyway ?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LucyStoner said:

I’ve always been appalled he was awarded even those supervised visits.  At most they should have required him to come to the DSHS office to have a supervised visit in a controlled environment where he couldn’t have killed them.  Or how about this?  Not make these kids visit someone who probably killed their mother.  Imagine a world where the kids come first.  

 

Refresh my memory here: So he was never convicted but was a suspect? If there was no other abuse documented, he would get visitation and this is horrifying but it's all about what is documented and proven. However, I think a county SW who is diligent could have insisted on DHHS site visits before community visits would be considered - at least in CA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Liz CA said:

 

Refresh my memory here: So he was never convicted but was a suspect? If there was no other abuse documented, he would get visitation and this is horrifying but it's all about what is documented and proven. However, I think a county SW who is diligent could have insisted on DHHS site visits before community visits would be considered - at least in CA.

in seattle - things were coming out really fast in overlapping jurisdictions.  (seems like a bunch of stuff happened within a week.  - and the info was still being processed.).  they'd found pedophile type drawings (not technically kiddie p**n because they were drawings) on josh's computer (as part of the investigation into the father's accusations (later conviction) - all computers in the house were seized). - so this was a different judge overseeing that case than the one overseeing the custody case and the investigators overseeing the missing person case.

utah was in charge of the missing person case - and they were going very slowly as they didn't want to blow the case.   they wanted him convicted.    i don't remember if they'd even formally named him as a suspect. they only had circumstantial evidence - but the boys were beginning to talk about what happened that night.

it's so easy to 20/20 armchair quarterback.  even if they were all cooperating, the bureaucracy of getting information between jurisdictions isn't particularly fast.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Liz CA said:

 

Refresh my memory here: So he was never convicted but was a suspect? If there was no other abuse documented, he would get visitation and this is horrifying but it's all about what is documented and proven. However, I think a county SW who is diligent could have insisted on DHHS site visits before community visits would be considered - at least in CA.

 

He’d lost custody to the maternal grandparents.  It takes a lot to lose custody to a non-parent relative. It wasn’t a situation where he was merely a suspect, there were DV and other factors.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LucyStoner said:

 

He’d lost custody to the maternal grandparents.  It takes a lot to lose custody to a non-parent relative. It wasn’t a situation where he was merely a suspect, there were DV and other factors.

The supervised visit should not have been at his house, they could have easily demanded that it be at a state office.   

 

Wow that does change the picture. If there was documented DV, there would have been supervised visits only at a DHHS facility in my county. Also, if parental rights were already terminated, was this supposed to be a good-bye visit? In CA, typically once PR are terminated, visits do not continue unless there are ordered sibling visits with whoever has custody of any sibling(s). So heartbreaking for the grandparents who lost their daughter and also their grandchildren. I just cannot imagine...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Liz CA said:

 

Wow that does change the picture. If there was documented DV, there would have been supervised visits only at a DHHS facility in my county. Also, if parental rights were already terminated, was this supposed to be a good-bye visit? In CA, typically once PR are terminated, visits do not continue unless there are ordered sibling visits with whoever has custody of any sibling(s). So heartbreaking for the grandparents who lost their daughter and also their grandchildren. I just cannot imagine...

 

He hadn’t lost parental rights, his ILs had won primary care and custody though.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Liz CA said:

 

Wow that does change the picture. If there was documented DV, there would have been supervised visits only at a DHHS facility in my county. Also, if parental rights were already terminated, was this supposed to be a good-bye visit? In CA, typically once PR are terminated, visits do not continue unless there are ordered sibling visits with whoever has custody of any sibling(s). So heartbreaking for the grandparents who lost their daughter and also their grandchildren. I just cannot imagine...

rights hadn't been terminated.  that was in process - after finding the dirty drawings on his computer was why he'd had the psychs3xual evaluation ordered - less than a week before he killed himself and his sons.   it seems to have been the final trigger.  part of the reason he got that last supervised visit was the latest information hadn't gotten "registered" with the family court.   (

he didn't let the cps agent in the house, pushed her back and locked the door after the boys were in the house).  she smelled gas and tried to get in and tried to call 911.  fortunately - she was away from the house when it blew or she probably would have died too.

 

3 hours ago, DawnM said:

 

No, I am saying he committed suicide and his brother committed suicide. 

thoughts are michael had  helped move susan's body after it became clear to them josh's story was so lame (camping in a blizzard with toddlers?) that police were starting to search the area.  

at least he seems to have had some conscience that he couldn't live with that.  the father destroyed two of his sons,, not to mention what josh did.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gardenmom5 said:

rights hadn't been terminated.  that was in process - after finding the dirty drawings on his computer was why he'd had the psychs3xual evaluation ordered - less than a week before he killed himself and his sons.   it seems to have been the final trigger.  part of the reason he got that last supervised visit was the latest information hadn't gotten "registered" with the family court.   (

he didn't let the cps agent in the house, pushed her back and locked the door after the boys were in the house).  she smelled gas and tried to get in and tried to call 911.  fortunately - she was away from the house when it blew or she probably would have died too.

 

thoughts are michael had  helped move susan's body after it became clear to them josh's story was so lame (camping in a blizzard with toddlers?) that police were starting to search the area.  

at least he seems to have had some conscience that he couldn't live with that.  the father destroyed two of his sons,, not to mention what josh did.

 

Yes, I read that.  That was one very messed up family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...