Jump to content

Menu

Long division


Recommended Posts

I haven't really thought about it because I've known how to do this for as long as I can remember, but long division requires division, multiplication, subtraction, and greater/less than determination...

 

I was at the end of my rope before I opened the book on this today. Now I'm dangling from it.

 

Somebody pass the wine. Momma needs a time out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was in 3rd grade (ps), the first day my teacher introduced long division half the class ended up in tears, including me. She was a good teacher, but we just didn't get it. We all survived and I ended up getting a degree in math ed. I'm sure she would not have believed that would happen that day. Long division can be overcome!:thumbup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was scared to death when we started long division because I have a kid that really, and I mean *really*, struggled with multiplication. I took a crazy chance and moved on to division, despite his not mastering multiplication, just to start something new. Lo and behold, he took to division like a pro and the multiplication came together. It had to, obviously :D.

 

Long division is a tough one, to be sure. Hang in there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't really thought about it because I've known how to do this for as long as I can remember, but long division requires division, multiplication, subtraction, and greater/less than determination...

 

I was at the end of my rope before I opened the book on this today. Now I'm dangling from it.

 

Somebody pass the wine. Momma needs a time out.

 

 

BTDT and flunked the test! This by far was the most computational challenged concept that we have faced in a long time. LOL :lol:

 

I literally tossed the book outside! (I will print that MM chapter again later. It felt good to throw it away.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's getting it.... sort of.... Say he is dividing 205 by 9.... He says... Well, I can't divide 20 by 9 and the closest I can get is 18... So he writes 18 under 20 and then divides 18 by 9. Writes the 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 20. Writes down the 2, brings down the 5 for 25... Then he says... Well, 18 is still as close as I can get. Writes 18 under 25. Divides 18 by 9 and puts 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 25 for a remainder of 7 which he puts on top.... No multiplication involved whatsoever. However, it results in the correct answer and the written work looks the same as if he had multiplied so does it matter that his process is a little different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's getting it.... sort of.... Say he is dividing 205 by 9.... He says... Well, I can't divide 20 by 9 and the closest I can get is 18... So he writes 18 under 20 and then divides 18 by 9. Writes the 2 on top.

 

No multiplication involved whatsoever. However, it results in the correct answer and the written work looks the same as if he had multiplied so does it matter that his process is a little different?

 

Somehow seeing 2 9s in 18 feels multiplicationy enough for me. :)

I'd go for it, and point out now and then how the 2 and 9 go to the 18.

Do you have the triangular flash cards? I would cover one number or the other, and kiddo would, therefore, flip back and forth between division and multi. If he hung up (usually on division), I could prompt, e.g., "Well, what would you multiply 7 by to get 28?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's getting it.... sort of.... Say he is dividing 205 by 9.... He says... Well, I can't divide 20 by 9 and the closest I can get is 18... So he writes 18 under 20 and then divides 18 by 9. Writes the 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 20. Writes down the 2, brings down the 5 for 25... Then he says... Well, 18 is still as close as I can get. Writes 18 under 25. Divides 18 by 9 and puts 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 25 for a remainder of 7 which he puts on top.... No multiplication involved whatsoever. However, it results in the correct answer and the written work looks the same as if he had multiplied so does it matter that his process is a little different?

 

This is exactly how my dd did this. One of the errors she would make is forget to write a number in the quotient, so she would end up with say, 203 instead of 2031 because everything at the bottom would be finished out, but she would forget to write that last number. Eventually she started to do it the way I taught her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Did you know not everyone learned short division in school? I posted on a different board once, stating a casual comment about short division, and numerous people replied, "What's that?" or "I've never heard of that" or "Wow, we didn't do that in school, that's neat!" I was surprised! I can do division in my head (okay, within reason) because of short division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you know not everyone learned short division in school? I posted on a different board once, stating a casual comment about short division, and numerous people replied, "What's that?" or "I've never heard of that" or "Wow, we didn't do that in school, that's neat!" I was surprised! I can do division in my head (okay, within reason) because of short division.

 

I never learned that but it makes total sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used base ten blocks too. In fact, we just did a problem or two of long division on the white board for about a month. It was very low key and easy.

I'd write a problem on the board like 1398 divided by 3. She'd get out the base ten blocks and do it step by step. Her dialogue would go something like this: "One thousand block... hmmm... I can't divide that by three. Okay, I'll change that into 10 hundred blocks. Now, with the 3 hundred blocks, I have 13 hundred blocks. Alright, I can put the 13 into three groups... four each. But I have one left over. That's okay, I'll turn that hundred into 10 tens. With the 9 tens, that'll be 19 tens... etc..." As she talked it through, I'd have her do the algorithm on the white board (or graph paper, so it all lined up). It wasn't hard at all. She figured it out without stress or tears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dracula Must Suck Blood

 

Divide, Multiply, Subtract, Bring down.

 

Or make your own phrase if that one is too icky.

 

Start slow and easy. It will take time and practice to master.

The payoff is that it will really help cement fact families.

 

I'd have my kids write D M S B at the top of their page. For us, it stood for Dad Mom Sister Brother, which is the order of our family.

 

I used the 1" blocks that came with elementary Saxon to teach long division; we eased into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's getting it.... sort of.... Say he is dividing 205 by 9.... He says... Well, I can't divide 20 by 9 and the closest I can get is 18... So he writes 18 under 20 and then divides 18 by 9. Writes the 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 20. Writes down the 2, brings down the 5 for 25... Then he says... Well, 18 is still as close as I can get. Writes 18 under 25. Divides 18 by 9 and puts 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 25 for a remainder of 7 which he puts on top.... No multiplication involved whatsoever. However, it results in the correct answer and the written work looks the same as if he had multiplied so does it matter that his process is a little different?

 

Your son's method always is the way that made more sense to me anyway, and is logically equivalent imo.

 

As a matter of fact, if I'm doing division purely for myself, I write it out in fractions. So I get 205/9 = 180/9 + 25/9 = 20 + 18/9 + 7/9 = 22 + 7/9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's getting it.... sort of.... Say he is dividing 205 by 9.... He says... Well, I can't divide 20 by 9 and the closest I can get is 18... So he writes 18 under 20 and then divides 18 by 9. Writes the 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 20. Writes down the 2, brings down the 5 for 25... Then he says... Well, 18 is still as close as I can get. Writes 18 under 25. Divides 18 by 9 and puts 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 25 for a remainder of 7 which he puts on top.... No multiplication involved whatsoever. However, it results in the correct answer and the written work looks the same as if he had multiplied so does it matter that his process is a little different?

 

Er... this is the only way I've ever done division. What other way is there? (Off to look...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried the Khan vids with color-coded place values? Very nice.

 

I'll look into this. My ds is wearing thin my patience with messing up place value when multiplying and dividing. I can only explain it so many times before I snap! "I keep forgetting," is not acceptable dear ds. :glare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone explain to me short division? I never did, none of my children ever did it, and I don't even know what it is. Is it estimation?

 

Did you look at the Wiki link posted earlier? To me, it looks like long division, but instead of writing out all the steps and bringing down, you write the number after each subtraction step in small beside the next digit in the dividend. I don't see much difference personally, but this is from a person that apparently takes a shortcut (or something) with long division as it is, so perhaps I'm not the best one to reply here!

 

Melanie (slightly confused because it seems simple enough that I think I might be missing something! ha!)

Edited by MelanieM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll look into this. My ds is wearing thin my patience with messing up place value when multiplying and dividing. I can only explain it so many times before I snap! "I keep forgetting," is not acceptable dear ds. :glare:

 

Thank you, Thank you for sharing this - I'm very, very weary of trying to explain... at least I'm not the only one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's getting it.... sort of.... Say he is dividing 205 by 9.... He says... Well, I can't divide 20 by 9 and the closest I can get is 18... So he writes 18 under 20 and then divides 18 by 9. Writes the 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 20. Writes down the 2, brings down the 5 for 25... Then he says... Well, 18 is still as close as I can get. Writes 18 under 25. Divides 18 by 9 and puts 2 on top. Subtracts 18 from 25 for a remainder of 7 which he puts on top.... No multiplication involved whatsoever. However, it results in the correct answer and the written work looks the same as if he had multiplied so does it matter that his process is a little different?

That's how I will do it and so dos DS. What's wrong with this???:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Thank you for sharing this - I'm very, very weary of trying to explain... at least I'm not the only one.

 

You're welcome. :) It's nice knowing that other homeschool moms are not perfect. ;)

 

I always laugh when people say to me that they don't have the patience to homeschool. Yeah, patience is not always my strong point. :tongue_smilie: I have learned to take deep breaths. :D Oh, and outsourcing like Khan's Academy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone explain to me short division? I never did, none of my children ever did it, and I don't even know what it is. Is it estimation?

 

Not estimation at all, it gives the exact answer. You just work to the solution in the same "footprint" as the written problem (under the division "tent"), you don't go down the page with the multiplication, subtracting and bringing down. Look at this wikipedia article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...