Jump to content

Menu

pot stirring :) If you had a farm...


fairfarmhand
 Share

Recommended Posts

And applied for farm assistance grants are you a recipient of government assistance?

 

Background....

 

We have a farm and it is not our primary source of income. It is an income producing farm (however, it's mostly a money pit) since we sell beef cattle and raise our own food. We are not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination, and our farm is less than 50 acres.

 

We apply for farm grants to help with improvements on the farm. For instance, we got a grant to pay for a bull to improve our herd, equipment for handling our cattle, and a hay barn.

 

Currently, we are looking into a different kind of grant program. We had a sinkhole open up on our property. This sinkhole does not hold water, but is a part of the water table, so the water runs out an opening in the bottom. This is the only place on that part of our land to put a pond, so we are limited with what we can do with that part of our property since our animals won't have access to water there. There's a program that is designed to help farmers with sinkholes by assisting them in putting in a well with waterers for animals.

 

The thoughts have been buzzing in my mind about Is this any different from welfare? The other threads are just stirring my thoughts on this issue.

 

(I have come to a conclusion, but I want to hear other thoughts before I express them)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another example. Part of our garden is categorised as agricultural land - I have no duty to change this categorisation, as far as I know. Because of this status, we have to right to more-or-less unlimited amounts of sterile compost, made from government-collected green waste. All I have to do is pick it up. I can use it to put on my flowers if I want. Am I a recipient of government assistance if I take it?

 

ETA: or I could put the compost on a veggie patch and help to feed my family.

 

Laura

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See someone on the other thread mentioned agricultural subsidies. We bought property 2 years ago that was part of the subsidy program. I am not sure how the program works (corn base, wheat base???) but just by buying the property we got a check in the mail. It wasn't much, but it paid the taxes on the property.

 

(Laura, I would SO love it if they'd offer compost assistance on our farm!!!! That WOULD be awesome.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but is your real question whether it should be "stigmatized" government assistance?

 

If it makes you feel better, there are many subsidies that exclude farmers on the theory that farmers have to look to the ag subsidies.

 

My business accepted a local government forgivable loan for buying vacant property and placing it back in use. The local government wants to encourage folks from letting the area go to weed. The incentives impact business decisions, just as they are intended to. I did have to put up 100% cash collateral against it (my kids' education fund) for 5 years AND promise that several dozen new jobs would be created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And applied for farm assistance grants are you a recipient of government assistance?

 

Background....

 

We have a farm and it is not our primary source of income. It is an income producing farm (however, it's mostly a money pit) since we sell beef cattle and raise our own food. We are not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination, and our farm is less than 50 acres.

 

We apply for farm grants to help with improvements on the farm. For instance, we got a grant to pay for a bull to improve our herd, equipment for handling our cattle, and a hay barn.

 

Currently, we are looking into a different kind of grant program. We had a sinkhole open up on our property. This sinkhole does not hold water, but is a part of the water table, so the water runs out an opening in the bottom. This is the only place on that part of our land to put a pond, so we are limited with what we can do with that part of our property since our animals won't have access to water there. There's a program that is designed to help farmers with sinkholes by assisting them in putting in a well with waterers for animals.

 

The thoughts have been buzzing in my mind about Is this any different from welfare? The other threads are just stirring my thoughts on this issue.

 

(I have come to a conclusion, but I want to hear other thoughts before I express them)

 

 

Yes, subsidies, stabilization programs and other such assistance is government assistance, or "welfare". I see no problem with using them if you need them, but don't kid yourself that they are any different from other government assistance programs. It is welfare for a business, as opposed to an individual, but the premise is the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to say that I don't think anyone has the right to judge whether or not anyone applies for or receives help from the government.

 

Glad I could add to this discussion. :tongue_smilie:

 

 

Absolutely! I assign no moral equation to government assistance. If it were not meant to be used, it would not be available. I just don't think that people should be trying to justify one type of assistance over another. It is all welfare, and there's nothing to justify or judge about any of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not share in the anti-government sentiment that is often expressed. Personally I am grateful for firemen and police officers, interstate and other highways, air traffic controllers, public health projects..

 

Because of federal student loans and state student subsidies, my husband and I became highly productive citizens who add a goodly amount to the tax base. We have more than repaid the government's investment in us..

 

My son participated in 4-H which is in part funded by the national and state agricultural departments. Do we call this government aid?

 

All of us are recipients of some form of government assistance--direct or indirect. Personally I'd rather my tax dollars go to small farmers than defense contractors.

 

Jane (who has a sweet spot for small farmers)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure it this way....Improvements to our farm are so we can work it. I feel a bit better about that, because it's not JUST a handout. We have to be actually working a farm to get them. We actually have to have a minimum number of animals to even apply for these programs.

 

Anyway, I've thought a lot about this. People spout about corporate subsidies, welfare, and government assistance, but don't they realize that almost everyone benefits from these in a roundabout way? I mean, wouldn't the costs of food be much much higher if not for farm assistance? Wouldn't the costs for anything be much much higher without subsidies? I mean, I am sure that eventually things would settle out if all of the sudden all government assistance were gone, but in the interim 3-4 years while people were adjusting wouldn't it be difficult?

 

Am I missing something? I mean really, don't all people end up benefiting from government programs like subsidies and assistance?

 

I think though what drives most people bonkers is the scale of these programs is that there is massive waste and fraud because there's just so much bureaucracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not share in the anti-government sentiment that is often expressed. Personally I am grateful for firemen and police officers, interstate and other highways, air traffic controllers, public health projects..

 

Because of federal student loans and state student subsidies, my husband and I became highly productive citizens who add a goodly amount to the tax base. We have more than repaid the government's investment in us..

 

My son participated in 4-H which is in part funded by the national and state agricultural departments. Do we call this government aid?

 

All of us are recipients of some form of government assistance--direct or indirect. Personally I'd rather my tax dollars go to small farmers than defense contractors.

 

Jane (who has a sweet spot for small farmers)

 

isn't it odd that people who are so outspoken against welfare are so quick to sign up for educational college grants and loans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure it this way....Improvements to our farm are so we can work it. I feel a bit better about that, because it's not JUST a handout. We have to be actually working a farm to get them. We actually have to have a minimum number of animals to even apply for these programs.

 

Anyway, I've thought a lot about this. People spout about corporate subsidies, welfare, and government assistance, but don't they realize that almost everyone benefits from these in a roundabout way? I mean, wouldn't the costs of food be much much higher if not for farm assistance? Wouldn't the costs for anything be much much higher without subsidies? I mean, I am sure that eventually things would settle out if all of the sudden all government assistance were gone, but in the interim 3-4 years while people were adjusting wouldn't it be difficult?

 

Am I missing something? I mean really, don't all people end up benefiting from government programs like subsidies and assistance?

 

 

You're exactly right. I agree. I do think what you describe is government assistance, but I am not on the "government assistance is BAD" team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...