Just responding to OP here. We're sort of traditional, in that he works, and I stay home. We're sort of not in that I pretty much do everything that's not paid employment (or at least try). But again, traditional in that I wouldn't feel diminished if he decided to do all the "man" stuff around here. And I never want to work ever. Where it looks really traditional is decision making. He gets the final call, unless he says it's up to me. If we go on vacation, I'll do all the sifting through rental listings and come up with 10-12, toss them at him, and he'll come up with his top three, and I'll go book, starting with his first pick. Then again, one could really spin that either way, because I'm the first filter, but it's his top pick that I go for first when booking. If I don't manage to succeed, I feel bad, but he's fine.
Now for he first half of our marriage, I did just wordlessly enact any and every preference he expressed, without him demanding that or even really being aware of it. I learned not to do that, but that looked traditional, but it was just me at the time, not our faith or his dominance or anything like that. I'm mostly cured of that, though. Now I'll put my two cents in, but still--if I want floors and he says we need siding more, we get siding. If I like colors A B or C and he likes F, we'll go with F unless I just hate it (which I wouldn't), for a few reasons: 1) I don't care that much, 2) it's not worth a fuss, and 3) he has a better eye than I do. If it's something that I do care about and is worth a fuss, I'll (respectfully) dig in my heels. I didn't once and still regret it, though at this point, I can sort of see his side of the issue.
So I don't know if you'd class that as egalitarian or complementarian, traditional or contemporary. I think a good marriage has aspects of all four of those labels and that marriage roles go much deeper than who takes out the trash or does the dishes. :)