Jump to content

Menu

FLL "not fun enough?"


RachaelL
 Share

Recommended Posts

I run a few structured learning groups for homeschooling families in my area. I'm having a little disagreement with my LA teacher about our curriculum. I love FLL for how thorough, comprehensive, and explicit it is. The LA teacher has requested, "fun, fill-in-the-blank worksheets, of the type they use in school." She thinks FLL is dry.While I can see where she's coming from, I so much love the intellectualism and explicitness of FLL. I love how it is so orderly it is almost mathematical. I was hoping to use GWTM for my older group as well. Can anyone chime in on personal experience with "fun" worksheets vs. FLL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RachaelL said:

I run a few structured learning groups for homeschooling families in my area. I'm having a little disagreement with my LA teacher about our curriculum. I love FLL for how thorough, comprehensive, and explicit it is. The LA teacher has requested, "fun, fill-in-the-blank worksheets, of the type they use in school." She thinks FLL is dry.While I can see where she's coming from, I so much love the intellectualism and explicitness of FLL. I love how it is so orderly it is almost mathematical. I was hoping to use GWTM for my older group as well. Can anyone chime in on personal experience with "fun" worksheets vs. FLL?

I think it would be hard to use FLL with a group.  I have never heard my kids describe fill in the blank worksheets as fun though.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have to agree-fill in the blank worksheets are torture for my kids. (trying to fit the answer into the space provided as well as figuring out what word and how to spell it if no word bank is given). However, if there was a worksheet with circles, matching lines, underlining, basically anything but writing-they're all over it. Now, whether they retain anything from that is hit and miss, but.....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First Language Lessons wasn't for us. We did a lot of language arts hopping though. We finally settled down with Barefoot Meandering English Lessons through Literature with eldest. But are using 8filtheheart's Treasured Conversations this year. Next in line just turned 7 and we are using Guest Hollow's Beowulf's Grammar and he finds it extremely fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FLL didn't work at all with my older, and we switched to the not particularly fun, get it done Growing with Grammar, which both of my kids did without complaint.  By the time older was in 4th grade, I had heard about MCT language arts, and we've loved it.  It's worked for both of my kids.  Older will start the 4th level, and younger will start the 2nd this fall.  

Edited to add - that being said, I probably wouldn't teach somewhere if I had to use a curriculum that wasn't a good fit with my style.  At our co-op, there's some give and take to figure out is best fit between what the group needs and what the teacher is comfortable using.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreeing with previous posters that perhaps the person who will actually be in the class and teaching the material should pick the material that they are most comfortable with. However, if FLL has already been purchased or promised as what will be used, what about making sure to include fun supplements to be done for part of the class time to reinforce concepts, and let parents oversee FLL as done at home after the teacher presents the lesson in class? Ideas:

- Schoolhouse Rock videos: Grammar Rock (parts of speech) -- gr. 1-5
- Mad Libs (parts of speech) -- gr. 1+
- Gramar Ad Libs (parts of speech) -- gr. 2-4
- Grammar Games and Activities (parts of speech, capitalization, punctuation, contractions, subject/verb agreement, verb tense) -- gr. 2-4
- Fun With Grammar: 75 Quick Activities and Games (parts of speech) -- gr. 4-6
- Awesome Hands-On Activities for Teaching Grammar (nouns, verbs, sentences, fragments, run-ons) -- gr. 4-8
- Comic Strip Grammar (parts of speech; sentences; punctuation; using verbs; special topics) -- gr. 5-8
- Take 5 Minutes: A History Fact a Day for Editing (proof-editing practice; could write a few on the board and have the kids come up and correct them) -- gr. 4-6

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for your replies! 

On 7/23/2018 at 3:44 PM, 8FillTheHeart said:

If the other person is doing the teaching, why not allow her to make the choice of what she wants to use?

I hear, definitely a good point.

On 7/23/2018 at 3:52 PM, kiwik said:

I think it would be hard to use FLL with a group.

I'm wondering if that is why it was difficult. I've been looking through GWTM, which looks very nicely suited for a group. Maybe FLL just isn't.

On 7/23/2018 at 4:07 PM, alisha said:

However, if there was a worksheet with circles, matching lines, underlining, basically anything but writing-they're all over it.

Any suggestions?

On 7/24/2018 at 12:58 PM, macmacmoo said:

We finally settled down with Barefoot Meandering English Lessons through Literature with eldest. But are using 8filtheheart's Treasured Conversations this year. Next in line just turned 7 and we are using Guest Hollow's Beowulf's Grammar and he finds it extremely fun.

Thank you for all those suggestions! I'll look into them.

On 7/24/2018 at 1:56 PM, ClemsonDana said:

FLL didn't work at all with my older, and we switched to the not particularly fun, get it done Growing with Grammar, which both of my kids did without complaint.  By the time older was in 4th grade, I had heard about MCT language arts, and we've loved it.  It's worked for both of my kids.  Older will start the 4th level, and younger will start the 2nd this fall.  

Edited to add - that being said, I probably wouldn't teach somewhere if I had to use a curriculum that wasn't a good fit with my style.  At our co-op, there's some give and take to figure out is best fit between what the group needs and what the teacher is comfortable using. 

Thank you for the suggestions; what does MCT stand for, or is that what it's called?

And I'm totally supportive of my teacher, just trying to figure out what's best for everyone.

On 7/24/2018 at 4:39 PM, Lori D. said:

However, if FLL has already been purchased or promised as what will be used, what about making sure to include fun supplements to be done for part of the class time to reinforce concepts, and let parents oversee FLL as done at home after the teacher presents the lesson in class? Ideas:

Such great ideas! Thank you so much, lots to look through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think FLL or GFTWTM would work well in a group. The lessons are so short and clearly written to be taught one-on-one. I know some people do these books with 2 or 3 kids and I just can't fathom it. It would take so much work for me to make that work, and that would sort of defeat the purpose of how easy it is to implement in how it appears to have been intended. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MCT language arts is a quirky program by Michael Clay Thompson, sold by Royal Fireworks Press.  My kids have different likes - even when I use the same topics, I tend to cover them differently (the only program that I've used identically for them is Singapore Math) - but this one worked with both of them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Paradox5 said:

As an aside-- would this fit well as an inbetween after FLL/WWE but before GWTM/WWS? I have looked at it for years but never jumped on it.

We never did WWE - it wasn't out yet when my oldest was that age - but it did fit very well before WWS.  It was very incremental and didn't expect too much individual writing in the first book, just learning how to sequence, retell, change details, and finally write similar pieces.  It was also his first introduction to a detailed rubric.  WWS was a nice follow-on after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 7/28/2018 at 9:51 PM, Paradox5 said:

Fun wkshts = learn and retain nothing

FLL = remember forever 

Not everything needs to be fun. It needs to be mastered. Stand your ground.

Checking this after not being on here for a while - LOVE this!

And I do agree - I think my teacher is scared of the rigorousness. She's new to the classical method. In the end, we compromised - she's teaching Beuwolf's Grammar to the younger kids, and I have the older kids; we're doing FLL4 and loving it!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2018 at 2:39 PM, RachaelL said:

I run a few structured learning groups for homeschooling families in my area. I'm having a little disagreement with my LA teacher about our curriculum. I love FLL for how thorough, comprehensive, and explicit it is. The LA teacher has requested, "fun, fill-in-the-blank worksheets, of the type they use in school." She thinks FLL is dry.While I can see where she's coming from, I so much love the intellectualism and explicitness of FLL. I love how it is so orderly it is almost mathematical. I was hoping to use GWTM for my older group as well. Can anyone chime in on personal experience with "fun" worksheets vs. FLL?

FLL is grammar, yes? My favorite grammar is Easy Grammar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...