Jump to content

Menu

Recommended Posts

If a hundred years from now (perhaps a lot less than that) the story of Barack Obama is told to students in terms like Washington and Lincoln were when I was a child, I'd be neither surprised or...

 

Actually I won't be here, so...

 

In the mean time he is a partisan political figure as well as a President (who deserves the respect of his office, but not "endorsement" by a school.

 

S o for now I'm OK with Paul Bunyon, feeling uneasy about Daniel Boone, and back-peddling on Davey Crocket (but enjoyed the show in the 60s :tongue_smilie:)

 

Bill

 

You make me laugh. :lol: All presidents are political and historical figures. Plenty of people who didn't like Reagan's politics still mourned him and spoke well of him shortly after his death. Every political figure is going to do *some* good. I even agree with Donald Rumsfeld about a lot of things. Maybe I watch so much CSPAN that at some point they are going to say something I agree with. I just don't feel this sort of animosity that some (on both sides, I get in an equal amount of trouble with my liberal friends) feel. It's like the rooting for a football team instead of engaging in political debate. :D

 

I am not barking up any tree at all. I didn't share the photo for a reason - mostly because I wasn't sure what it meant. The title of the book, the blurb, just made me go...hmmm. Which is what I do with most of what I read about Obama.

 

You didn't say "hmmmm" you said "oh my gosh how horrible and frightening" and you didn't even know who the author was or what the book was about. I don't find that logical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In 1492 Columbus sailed the ccean blue

And took the brown people as slaves.

 

You never did hear that version.

 

You forgot the line about where he cut off their noses and ears, killed the babies and gave the women to his men.

 

But it was all in the name of God of course, so hey! Pass a cannoli!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an e-mail a few weeks back with a picture of Obama getting on Air Force 1 with a copy of This Book. I find that absolutely terrifying, if it is true. I realize pictures can be doctored and such, so I didn't pass this one along....but if it is what he was reading, it aligns with some of the beliefs I have had about him all along. And, for the record, none of those have anything to do with him being black. I also find it funny that he is half white, but no one ever really mentions that. My nieces are mixed race (african american and caucasian) just like Obama...

 

 

LOLOLOL! Fareed Zakaria is awesome. I can't wait to read that book. His show GPS is a must watch in our house.

 

Sheeew, unsubscribe to those lists, or at least google the title and author.

 

Here-

 

"This is not a book about the decline of America, but rather about the rise of everyone else." So begins Fareed Zakaria's important new work on the era we are now entering. Following on the success of his best-selling The Future of Freedom, Zakaria describes with equal prescience a world in which the United States will no longer dominate the global economy, orchestrate geopolitics, or overwhelm cultures. He sees the "rise of the rest"—the growth of countries like China, India, Brazil, Russia, and many others—as the great story of our time, and one that will reshape the world. The tallest buildings, biggest dams, largest-selling movies, and most advanced cell phones are all being built outside the United States. This economic growth is producing political confidence, national pride, and potentially international problems. How should the United States understand and thrive in this rapidly changing international climate? What does it mean to live in a truly global era? Zakaria answers these questions with his customary lucidity, insight, and imagination.

 

 

Well, I guess it's just easier to believe that Obama is plotting the destruction of America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, though, there's a different "feel" to offering a song to a past president, who is dead!! It seems less like worship that way.

 

 

I see I need to clarify past presidents. I am not refering to George Washington. I am referiing to the presidents of my childhood. Ford, Carter, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't say "hmmmm" you said "oh my gosh how horrible and frightening" and you didn't even know who the author was or what the book was about. I don't find that logical.

 

No..I said, "I got an e-mail a few weeks back with a picture of Obama getting on Air Force 1 with a copy of This Book. I find that absolutely terrifying, if it is true. I realize pictures can be doctored and such, so I didn't pass this one along....but if it is what he was reading, it aligns with some of the beliefs I have had about him all along. "

 

I personally think that Obama is all for "the rise of the rest" and that is all I will say as to why it disturbs me that he was reading this book. I won't change how I feel on that - no matter who the author was. It just doesn't sit well with me. But, again, I didn't bring this up to stir the pot...I brought it up and specific response to someone who has the same feelings about Obama that I do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or it could be that you defaulted to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Godwin's Law.

 

Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies)[1] is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990 which has become an Internet adage. It states: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."[2][3]

Godwin's Law is often cited in online discussions as a deterrent against the use of arguments in the widespread reductio ad Hitlerum form. The rule does not make any statement about whether any particular reference or comparison to Adolf Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate, but only asserts that the likelihood of such a reference or comparison arising increases as the discussion progresses. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued,[4] that overuse of Nazi and Hitler comparisons should be avoided, because it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.

 

There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[2] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress. This principle itself is frequently referred to as Godwin's Law. It is considered poor form to raise such a comparison arbitrarily with the motive of ending the thread. There is a widely recognized codicil that any such ulterior-motive invocation of Godwin's law will be unsuccessful (this is sometimes referred to as "Quirk's Exception").[6]

 

umm...I am not even sure what your point is here. I didn't make the comparison to end the thread - I actually feel that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did ANYONE say or imply it was the sign of the Apocalypse? :confused:

 

Not that I saw.

 

And, are people implying that Davy Crockett WASN'T born on a mountain top in Tennessee, purtiest state in the land of the free; raised in the woods so he knew every tree, killed him a bahr when he was only 3? I'm shocked and dismayed! SHOCKED AND DISMAYED, I tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I saw.

 

And, are people implying that Davy Crockett WASN'T born on a mountain top in Tennessee, purtiest state in the land of the free; raised in the woods so he knew every tree, killed him a bahr when he was only 3? I'm shocked and dismayed! SHOCKED AND DISMAYED, I tell you.

 

 

Very nice.

 

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely Creepy

 

Would you feel the same if the song had been about Bush rather than Obama?

 

I would. I wasn't a big fan of George Bush. I didn't vote for him, didn't vote for Clinton, Obama, McCain, etc. I've always voted 3rd party.

 

I also think the pledge of allegience is creepy and for the life of me can't grasp that all you have to do to make the conservatives fall for a socialist ploy is add "under God" to it.

 

And I don't remember ever learning any song about any President -even Washington. I do remember the Poem about Columbus sailing the ocean blue and Paul Revere's Midnight Ride and Hiawatha but nothing that was a praise song, much less one that mocks a Christian song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely Creepy

 

 

 

I would. I wasn't a big fan of George Bush. I didn't vote for him, didn't vote for Clinton, Obama, McCain, etc. I've always voted 3rd party.

 

I also think the pledge of allegience is creepy and for the life of me can't grasp that all you have to do to make the conservatives fall for a socialist ploy is add "under God" to it.

 

And I don't remember ever learning any song about any President -even Washington. I do remember the Poem about Columbus sailing the ocean blue and Paul Revere's Midnight Ride and Hiawatha but nothing that was a praise song, much less one that mocks a Christian song.

 

:thumbup1: Word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? Jesus couldn't get elected president. He hung out with prostitutes and lepers. FOX News would tar and feather him before the first primary. People magazine would have him on the worst-dressed list. He'd suggest caring for the least among us and the Republican party would start in with the socialist name calling.

 

There wouldn't be any songs praising him. He'd be more liberal than Ted Kennedy. You'd all hate him.

 

Oh please. Yeah, I am sure Jesus would be a liberal Democrat. I can just see him with his Pro-choice sign. I am pretty sure Jesus wouldn't be a politician, nor would he like them. I also don't think he would forcibly take money from one to give to another. Jesus wasn't a politician.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, Lincoln and Washington aren't presently living. There is something less manipulative about a song honoring a president who isn't presently making policies that affect our world!!

 

I was posting that in response to someone who said they weren't familiar with such songs.

 

Since it was an extra curricular activity I don't see what is wrong with it. I would probably not be comfortable if it was done during school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm...I am not even sure what your point is here. I didn't make the comparison to end the thread - I actually feel that way.

 

 

Just that when you bring out a Hitler comparison that it basically means you lost the argument.

 

So, you think that Obama is a dictator who is trying to lull his county into a false sense of security so he can separate us then pack the undesirables off into concentration camps and gas them?

 

Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was posting that in response to someone who said they weren't familiar with such songs.

 

Since it was an extra curricular activity I don't see what is wrong with it. I would probably not be comfortable if it was done during school.

 

I generally agree. I do also agree that it isn't clear whether it was during the day or extra-curricular since the school isn't talking about it (who can blame them?). I have no problem with it as an extra-curricular, I wouldn't think it's appropriate during school. Of course, my many, many issues with how the public school system treats history is one of the main (if not THE main) reason I homeschool.

Edited by Mrs Mungo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Would you feel the same if the song had been about Bush rather than Obama?

Yep. Look, the whole thing is odd (though no moreso than the Pledge of Allegiance, which I've declined to recite for more than three decades). It'd be odd regardless of the person/subject. But it's old news; that is to say, it's not newsworthy. It's making the rounds primarily to excite the bandwagon mentality displayed in this thread.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. Look, the whole thing is odd (though no moreso than the Pledge of Allegiance, which I've declined to recite for more than three decades). It'd be odd regardless of the person/subject. But it's old news; that is to say, it's not newsworthy. It's making the rounds primarily to excite the bandwagon mentality displayed in this thread.

 

I guess I'm just surprised that there was so much outrage over a prayer said over a Booster Club luncheon in the presence of a few students who were there to serve the meal, but not about a politically charged song taught directly to young children. Of course, if it happened outside of school time, it's not a big deal from a legal standpoint and I agree that's it's odd but not newsworthy. But if it happened during school time as was reported in the links that were posted, I think it was wrong.

Edited by LizzyBee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I've never heard any of those songs. I honestly cannot think of any song about any president that we sang in my schools. We might have sung the National Anthem, God Bless America, and other similar songs in Chorus. But nothing about presidents, living or dead.

 

I remember singing one about the cherry tree. :lol:

 

I don't think it says anywhere that the White House encouraged this song to be made up and sung. I do believe it is offensive call Obama Hitler-esque because it happened. Was Obama even aware of it?

Edited by Sis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember singing one about the cherry tree. :lol:

 

I don't think it says anywhere that the White House encouraged this song to be made up and sung. I do believe it is offensive call Obama Hitler-esque because it happened. Was Obama even aware of it?

 

 

And I thought Bush was divisive.

 

Obama -haters are over- the -top!

 

PS No! I am not an Obama worshipper!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember singing one about the cherry tree. :lol:

 

I don't think it says anywhere that the White House encouraged this song to be made up and sung. I do believe it is offensive call Obama Hitler-esque because it happened. Was Obama even aware of it?

 

I'd be surprised if the White House had anything to do with it. I haven't read anything to indicate they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be surprised if the White House had anything to do with it. I haven't read anything to indicate they did.

 

 

I think some people were needing to celebrate their excitement, the end. I hate having contributed to a long paranoia thread. I need a strawberry daiquiri, obviously.

 

Meet me at Armageddon. I'll be the one still wearing my clothes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no daiquiris but I do have Mike's hard limeades and margaritas, you are welcome to either. :D

 

I will take a drink whenever someone mentions Hitler. :tongue_smilie:

 

Why Hitler anyway? I don't see a real historical comparison here (for the record, my grandmother was German and her family helped to hide Jews during the war). Why not just say you think he might be a zombie that wants to eat the brains of Americans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people were needing to celebrate their excitement, the end. I hate having contributed to a long paranoia thread. I need a strawberry daiquiri, obviously.

 

Meet me at Armageddon. I'll be the one still wearing my clothes.

 

:lol: at your last line.

 

I've never met 6 yos who had sufficient political knowledge or interest to celebrate elections. But again, if this was not done as a school activity, it's just free speech and I don't have any problems with it. If it was done during school time, that's a different matter, and I think the conversation here would be flipped if the song had been about Bush.

 

I'm sure we'd all enjoy this conversation better over drinks. For the record, I'm not having heartburn or high blood pressure over this. It's just conversation. :cheers2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just that when you bring out a Hitler comparison that it basically means you lost the argument.

 

 

Hmmm... so in your opinion there will never be anyone else in the course of history who is in any way similar to Adolph Hitler?

 

From my viewpoint, if there is ever a similarity between a current day leader and Hitler, you can bet I will be watching very carefully and alerting others, because I never want anything like that to happen again, and I believe human nature is such that any number of people are capable of that kind of evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...