Jump to content

Menu

Is there anywhere with herd immunity?


Teaching3bears
 Share

Recommended Posts

The New York Times published an article yesterday summarizing the results of a monthlong widespread antibody testing program to estimate how many people had been exposed (testing was so severely constrained at the worst of NYC's crisis that only people with symptoms and medical personnel were able to get tested, which had a number of wonky rippling effects on a number of data measures). But this more recent antibody testing is an ex post attempt to begin to get a handle on the question of how many were exposed. FWIW, the antibody test is not as reliable as the antigen test.

The article's lede:

Quote

New York City on Tuesday released more than 1.46 million coronavirus antibody test results, the largest number to date, providing more evidence of how the virus penetrated deeply into some lower-income communities while passing more lightly across affluent parts of the city.

In one ZIP code in Queens, more than 50 percent of people who had gotten tested were found to have antibodies, a strikingly high rate. But no ZIP code south of 96th Street in Manhattan had a positive rate of more than 20 percent.

Across the city, more than 27 percent of those tested had positive antibody results. The borough with the highest rate was the Bronx, at 33 percent. Manhattan had the lowest rate, at 19 percent.

 

A little further down, caution that we still do not know one way or the other the extent or duration to which antibodies actually provide ongoing protection (the premise on which the hopes for "naturally occurring" "herd immunity" are based):

Quote

Some hard-hit areas may fare better during a second wave

Much remains unknown about the degree of protection against Covid-19 that antibodies may offer, or how long that protection may last. But the neighborhoods with more residents who were infected at the height of New York’s outbreak in March and April may be less likely to be among the hardest hit during a second wave...

..Of course, neighborhoods are not sealed off from one another, and even under the most optimistic predictions, most neighborhoods — and millions of New Yorkers — remain vulnerable to infection in a second wave.

Still, the relatively high prevalence of antibodies may partly explain why New York has not seen a significant uptick in cases over the past several months, even as the city has begun to reopen and some New Yorkers have begun to relax their social distancing.

In interviews, epidemiologists have generally expressed surprise and relief at the relatively low rate of new infections in New York City, chalking it up to a variety of measures: widespread use of face coverings, adherence to social distancing recommendations and the continued ban on indoor dining and bars.

 

The city posted the raw data from the study here (I have not pored over it, I give you, @square_25 )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...