Shukhov Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I'm wondering what the reaction is to the following proposition and why. Proposition: It is possible to teach all the grammar a child needs by only teaching them Latin grammar. Agree? Disagree? Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magistramom Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I'm leaning to agreeing, but have to admit that we did have quite a vocab base built up by the time all the chants were memorized. You really need to have all the chants down and truly understand them. You can then start parsing sentences quite easily (Lingva Latina is a fun book to start with for parsing). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jami Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I think it can be done...by a teacher who knows both Latin and English grammar very well. English grammar is still taught, but Latin is the context in which it's taught. I don't think MOST of us probably know either well enough to not get a little help. I know I don't. But historically, English grammar wasn't a separate subject and plenty of very skilled writers and speakers seem to have been educated in that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateLeft Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I don't use a curriculum for English grammar, preferring to teach grammar informally, and in the context of Latin. I also forgo spelling and vocabulary programs. This year, after 5 years of Latin, my oldest daughter is very successfully using Wheelock's Latin, a grammar intensive program, and one which I used as a freshman Classics major in college. A strong grammar background is essential to succeeding with Wheelock's, and it's clear to me that my daughter was adequately prepared for that level of grammar by her previous years of Latin study. She was certainly more prepared than I was by my 4 years of high school English! :lol: She also successfully took two writing classes this summer at the state university, earning A's in both courses. Not bad for a kid who has never done a grammar workbook! :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peela Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I suspect it is possible, if you already know Latin and English grammar really well. You could teach the concepts in Latin but you would still have to transfer them across to English. I think its possible to teach anything without a curriculum if you already feel comfortable with the subject. My daughter has been telling me she learns so much grammar through Latin. But she also needs to and does learn grammar in context through writing. Its not like you could just learn grammar in Latin and that would be enough if you never used it in English. What's the point? Even though it is technically possible, the vast majority of us are not profficient enoguh in Latin and/or grammar to pull it off. If I had a younger child coming up, which I dont, knowing what I know now....I could/would maybe do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karenciavo Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I think it can be done...by a teacher who knows both Latin and English grammar very well. I suspect it is possible, if you already know Latin and English grammar really well. You could teach the concepts in Latin but you would still have to transfer them across to English. I think its possible to teach anything without a curriculum if you already feel comfortable with the subject. Yes, I think this is the secret. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sahamamama Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Shukhov -- Have you seen this? http://www.thelatinroad.com/ Hope this helps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colleen in NS Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Yes, I think this is the secret. :iagree: with what she quoted and said. There is no way I could teach English grammar through Latin - I don't know either subject well enough yet. So we need separate programs to walk me through teaching step by step in each language. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenny in Atl Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 :iagree: with what she quoted and said. There is no way I could teach English grammar through Latin - I don't know either subject well enough yet. So we need separate programs to walk me through teaching step by step in each language. Me too! I feel like Latin is reinforcing all of our English grammar work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abbeyej Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I think it's possible, but challenging. It requires a teacher who knows English *and* Latin grammar inside out, and who is committed to teaching them simultaneously. It also requires including English grammar and mechanics instruction along with writing. Absolutely doable, but very few of us are prepared to do it well. I also find that among my Latin students, the ones who study (even just a little) English grammar as well tend to have a better understanding of grammar concepts. I have no doubt that my Latin students have a better understanding of grammar than students who aren't getting Latin! ;) But studying both seems to be symbiotic -- working with each gives a better understanding of both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sagira Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Great thread. Just wanted to say, wonderful, sailmom! Your story is inspiring and encouraging :) As a person who has studied Dutch grammar alongside English grammar, I can say that Latin would most likely help very much. However, this also depends on a few factors: - a priority given to good grammar and usage - level of teacher's ease in instructing grammar - student's ability BTW, m y plan is to do gentle English grammar teaching starting in 2nd, then Latin starting in 4th or 5th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mama Lynx Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I come down on the side of "Yes, if the teacher is knowledegable about grammar." That said, I studied very little formal grammar in school. When I picked up Henle to teach myself Latin, I learned English grammar concepts I had never heard of. So when I took myself through Henle, I learned a good bit about English grammar. We more or less do the same grammar exercise in both languages, and of course translating Latin requires a constant review of grammar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Testimony Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I was studying online English grammar. If you go back to the 1800s, you will see that the English is similar to the Latin. When you put the "thees" and "thous" back into the language, you really start to see the crossover of Latin into English. I agree though that if you have a very strong English grammar background, you could get away with teaching only grammar through Latin. I learned Latin as a child and I did not have a good grammar background. I never made the connection until I started teaching Latin to my children. I teach Latin and English grammar seperately this year because I want them to grasp the language. I think teaching them simulateously helps them to grasp the concepts better. Blessings in your homeschooling journey. Sincerely, Karen http://www.homeschoolblogger.com/testimony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clwcain Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I learned no English grammar until I studied Latin. We will not be teaching English grammar as its own subject. They'll learn Latin and Greek. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frogpond1 Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 but I prefer to keep them both going because both Latin grammar and English grammar seem to help each other out. I don't do English grammar past Shurley 7 though. From then on it is all Latin grammar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mom to 3 Island Boys Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I believe that you COULD (and some do) learn English grammar through your Latin studies. But, I personally find that my kids, with strong backgrounds in English grammar before we begin studying Latin, are able to concentrate on the many intricacies of Latin without the added complication of having to figure out NEW grammar. Learning Latin is definitely an excellent, unparalleled review of grammar usage, but we would have to move at a much slower pace and devote more time to Latin studies if it was the first time they had faced these grammar terms. I personally believe the two (English grammar and Latin) go hand in hand ~ both are important in their own right, but they also back each other up. Any studying you do with one seems to reinforce the studying you do with the other. So, at least so far, we continue to study a separate Grammar curriculum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cindyg Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 Possible? I don't know. But practical for the average mom and dad who don't even know Latin themselves? No. In our homeschool, we're studying Latin; but we have plenty of time to study English grammar too. I can't imagine teaching outlining, sentence diagramming, and punctuation in Latin. These are easy to teach in English. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa in Australia Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 well, this is what I am planing to do. my son is 1/2 way through rod and staff 7. I am going to stop doing grammar after this , and he is going to do writing strands instead. ( he is very poor at writing) and he is going to start henle Latin. ( just finishing up on Latina Christiana 2) . He already has more grammar than most Australians ( where Grammar isn't really taught). and I am hoping that all the grammar he is going to learn in Henle will be a reinforcement of all the grammar he has learnt in English. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EKS Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I suppose you could, but I prefer to have the Latin grammar reinforce what my son already knows about English grammar. Sort of like how learning about base 6 helps you understand base 10 in math. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovedtodeath Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 The Latin Road claims to teach both Latin and English grammar, but TWTM says that you still need an English grammar course, even if you use this for Latin. I think you can find it in the chapter on languages for the logic stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.