Jump to content

Menu

Average child's iq is 9 points higher edit


Ausmumof3
 Share

Recommended Posts

Than their parents apparently.

 

There was a radio interview and since they've been doing iq tests each generation has gone up around 9 points. It's called the Flynn effect.

 

Do you think this is a real thing? Are kids actually getting smarter? Is it because education is getting better? Is it that since iq tests came in we are valuing those skills higher at the expense of others?

 

What other factors are there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read through the wikipedia article on it & it touches on some good points, including that some studies are finding that in the higher iq ranges, the generational effect is a decrease.

I think it's diet - both prenatal & postnatal - & stress (or more precisely, lack thereof).  And what I think is that the groups that were scoring low were stunted & so with improvements in health & lifestyle, they're more likely to reach full potential.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read through the wikipedia article on it & it touches on some good points, including that some studies are finding that in the higher iq ranges, the generational effect is a decrease.

 

I think it's diet - both prenatal & postnatal - & stress (or more precisely, lack thereof). And what I think is that the groups that were scoring low were stunted & so with improvements in health & lifestyle, they're more likely to reach full potential.

This makes sense to me as well, those times were during times of war and financial stress, poor diet etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I don't think kids are getting smarter. I think they're getting better at whatever IQ tests measure.

After waiting around while my boys took the wisc-iv tests, exposure to certain toys would have definitely help one section.

 

ETA:

Comically one of the workbooks K12 VA issued to my kids would be good test prep. They were already very good at those so I don't think the workbook skew the results much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've definitely gotten dumber since having kids. Isn't that called the Placenta Effect, or something?

 

My thoughts exactly! I was also 10 IQ points smarter at that age!

 

And yes, it's the Flynn effect. It just means that people are gaming the test, essentially, exposed to the concepts earlier, etc. IQs are not rising in areas in which no IQ tests are given even with better nutrition.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that it's because we play differently with our kids today--there are more shape sorters, things to manipulate and turn around, different ways of playing and different ways of talking to our kids.   IQ tests work best when it's something the child has not learned to do, as it can measure how well they figure out new things.  But if they've already been exposed to it, then it's not hard any more, though they aren't necessarily smarter in other ways.   That's my opinion, at any rate, though it's not a scientific one.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure about this, but wasn't the reading and comprehension level of a year 8 student in the past, about the standard of a year 12 now? Or something like that....?

If that's the case, I can't see that they are getting smarter. Maybe more versatile and broader in different areas, could that be perceived as a higher IQ? Thinking aloud. ;-)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While people may be scoring higher on things measured in IQ tests, previous generations knew many things that IQ tests don't measure. Saying that children today are "smarter" than their parents or that parents are smarter than their parents, grandparents and great-grandparents were strikes me as a form of age-ism. It's disrespectful.

 

My dad was smarter than I am. He was smarter than my children are. Maybe when my children have lived 80+ years, their intelligence will measure up to his. My mother-in-law probably wouldn't score high on an IQ test, but she knows a great deal about many things. IQ tests results are interesting, but they don't tell us everything.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While people may be scoring higher on things measured in IQ tests, previous generations knew many things that IQ tests don't measure. Saying that children today are "smarter" than their parents or that parents are smarter than their parents, grandparents and great-grandparents were strikes me as a form of age-ism. It's disrespectful.

 

My dad was smarter than I am. He was smarter than my children are. Maybe when my children have lived 80+ years, their intelligence will measure up to his. My mother-in-law probably wouldn't score high on an IQ test, but she knows a great deal about many things. IQ tests results are interesting, but they don't tell us everything.

I'm trying to decide why I disagree with this so strongly. Maybe because there isn't a value judgment to someone being "smarter," it is just a statement of fact? Some of my children are much "smarter" than their siblings, but that doesn't mean they are better or more valuable or more loved. If it *is* true that this effect is occurring (which is up for debate), stating that fact wouldn't be any more disrespectful to me than stating the change in average lifespan in the last X years. It isn't disrespectful to say that the average lifespan of my parents' generation is significantly longer than that of their great great-grandparents, is it?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to decide why I disagree with this so strongly. Maybe because there isn't a value judgment to someone being "smarter," it is just a statement of fact? Some of my children are much "smarter" than their siblings, but that doesn't mean they are better or more valuable or more loved. If it *is* true that this effect is occurring (which is up for debate), stating that fact wouldn't be any more disrespectful to me than stating the change in average lifespan in the last X years. It isn't disrespectful to say that the average lifespan of my parents' generation is significantly longer than that of their great great-grandparents, is it?

Yes, measuring intelligence doesn't measure value.But to say that we are now smarter than previous generations who knew how to get up at the Crack of dawn to milk cows, feed chickens, plant and harvest crops, and sew their own clothes seems like we aren't placing value on the type of intelligence that was needed to do all the things that previous generations did quite successfully. They knew how to build things with their hands. They knew the mechanics of how to fix cars and various other machines.Computers were first built in garages by people who came from people who grew and built and created things. They were smart.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...