As far as good being innocent, no, I don't believe anyone else is using that definition.
Rights, based on the Bill of Rights, are relative to the USA, but I believe the FFs were right about God given inalienable rights (life, liberty and the persuit of happiness), so those rights would only be relative to human beings, or born human beings.
Good, though, I'll still have to stick to my original defintion equating goodness with innocence. Once you have the knowledge of "evil" or "bad," then you've lost your innocence and have an obligation to do good. Since people will become lazy and give into vice, or perhaps prefer vice to the arduousness of persuing "good," laws are put into place.
Paine wrote a whole thing about this in "Common Sense" in the section on government. The laws are not so much to prevent people from doing "bad" things as to protect fellow citizens from experiencing a loss of their own rights due to the actions of someone else.