Jump to content

Menu

23andme question


Twolittleboys
 Share

Recommended Posts

So, I just got my 23andme results and for the most part they are as expected and fairly boring. I do know my family tree on one side pretty far back (late 1700s) but have little idea about my father's side. However, to the best of my knowledge all of my ancestors are from Germany (and on my mother's side from a fairly small part of it). The results I got pretty much agree with that (80+% German or general European). There is a fairly large amount of Czech but I think I know where that comes from (my father's maternal grandmother) and it isn't surprising given how close that is to Germany.

However, the results also show a very small percentage of Sub-Saharan Africa (0.3%). Now that number seems really small and at first I figured it is just a leftover from way long ago - we all have African ancestors after all. But the way they show it on the website it seems it means something different. 23andme notes this likely means that I have a Sudanese ancestor who was likely born between 1700 and 1790. 

Pretty exciting but also very confusing! I just can't imagine how someone from the Sudan (or anywhere close) could have gotten into my family tree way back then. I don't imagine many moved from Africa to Europe back then?

I know that some of you have quite a bit of experience with 23andme/genetics/genealogy so was wondering whether anyone has an idea? I know that small percentages can mean all kinds of stuff so is there any other explanation for this result? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Twolittleboys said:

So, I just got my 23andme results and for the most part they are as expected and fairly boring. I do know my family tree on one side pretty far back (late 1700s) but have little idea about my father's side. However, to the best of my knowledge all of my ancestors are from Germany (and on my mother's side from a fairly small part of it). The results I got pretty much agree with that (80+% German or general European). There is a fairly large amount of Czech but I think I know where that comes from (my father's maternal grandmother) and it isn't surprising given how close that is to Germany.

However, the results also show a very small percentage of Sub-Saharan Africa (0.3%). Now that number seems really small and at first I figured it is just a leftover from way long ago - we all have African ancestors after all. But the way they show it on the website it seems it means something different. 23andme notes this likely means that I have a Sudanese ancestor who was likely born between 1700 and 1790. 

Pretty exciting but also very confusing! I just can't imagine how someone from the Sudan (or anywhere close) could have gotten into my family tree way back then. I don't imagine many moved from Africa to Europe back then?

I know that some of you have quite a bit of experience with 23andme/genetics/genealogy so was wondering whether anyone has an idea? I know that small percentages can mean all kinds of stuff so is there any other explanation for this result? 

Those ethnicity results are constantly changing as the pool of samples increases.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it may change as time goes by.

But yes, there was lots of movement between Europe and Africa in those years.

My kids have ancestry from almost every part of the world.  They are from Latin America and have a small amount apparently from Spanish settlers, who were probably mixed due to the trading routes etc.  We all find it really cool and fascinating.  I was bummed that my own ancestry was much more boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I would definitely be excited to have something more exotic!

However, I am not so sure about there being much movement between Europe and Africa. I can not imagine someone from Africa moving to a small town in Germany in the 1700s and being integrated (this is just my perception so I MAY be wrong). I definitely can see some sailor etc. having kids in Africa but not so much bringing them back to Germany. I guess I will have to look more into my father's family as I really can't see how it could be my mother's family (also that seems more likely based on the DNA).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even small amounts tend to be accurate at the continent level, I imagine this is accurate. 

We think of people in the past not moving around as much as now but people were moving all over the world in the 18th and 19th centuries. Maybe a German sailor or soldier in the 1800's brought back a 1/4 African wife from somewhere.

Edited by maize
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hm, I will have to look at all the suggestions more in detail. 

I did look at the chromosome segments and I think it is on my father's side. Again, I wouldn't be surprised about the African if my ancestors lived in the US/Spain etc. but on my mother's side they have pretty much all lived in small towns in a limited area and as far as I can tell there were no sailors/soldiers etc. but small farmers etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Twolittleboys said:

Yes, I would definitely be excited to have something more exotic!

However, I am not so sure about there being much movement between Europe and Africa. I can not imagine someone from Africa moving to a small town in Germany in the 1700s and being integrated (this is just my perception so I MAY be wrong). I definitely can see some sailor etc. having kids in Africa but not so much bringing them back to Germany. I guess I will have to look more into my father's family as I really can't see how it could be my mother's family (also that seems more likely based on the DNA).

The Moors were african - they were in power in Spain before that.   european rulers would hire african mercenaries.  there most definitely was contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why it is difficult to imagine African people in Europe in the 1700s.  The Portuguese started enslaving Africans in the 1400s, and they didn't all come to the Americas.

According to this article (http://users.humboldt.edu/ogayle/hist110/enslaved.html), " ... the practice of slavery had been in operation in Africa and in central Europe for centuries prior to the redirection of the trade to the Americas."  Also, the graphic associated with this quote shows that .3 million slaves were transported from Africa to Europe.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...