newsong Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 I've had three dc since turning 35 and I've technically been in the high risk category (I was also in this category at 34 w/twins). But it really hasn't made any difference in the handling of my pregnancies. Just take good care of yourself and enjoy your pregnancy. As far as going from three to four, my dh said after you've had three you're already outnumbered and your brain is mush so it really doesn't matter how many more you have after that! Seriously, it shouldn't be a huge change, especially if your other dc are old enough to lend a hand. My older dc have been a wonderful help with the babies and toddlers and have (most of the time) enjoyed themselves in the process. If it makes you feel any better, I've been changing diapers since 1991 and I still have two in them now. I agree it would be nice to save the $ spent on diapers but this is just a season, albeit a l-o-n-g season! LOL! The actual changing of them doesn't even phase me after all these years - I'm on automatic pilot. I do have some cheerful help at the moment; my 6yo dd thinks it's fun that she's learned how to successfully change a...eh hem...filled diaper. And to her I say, "You go, girl!". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy in Orlando Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Congratulations! For us going from 1 to 3 (with twins) was the hardest move. Number four was a difficult baby, but no huge changes otherwise. And, I promise, the diapers DO end. Really, they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denise in IN Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Congratulations, Heather! My hardest transition was from 1 to 2! Once I had kids old enough to be independent and helpful, it was much easier to add another child. We have four now, and I figure that leaves two pairs - if dh and I can each handle two at a time, we're good! Enjoy your growing family! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unicorn. Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Everyone I know w/ more than 3 says it is easier. I wouldn't know. But I do know that I am very, very, happy for you!! Congrats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MomofSeven Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 But I don't think it was based shearly on the numbers, but more on the ages of our children at the time - 4 children under 5! Since then we've had numbers 5 and 6, and the adjustment has been much easier because my oldest can actually help alot! I think difficulty has more to do with the ages of your current children rather than the number of children you have - does that make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Bay Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 About the risk. The risk gradually increases with age. The reason 35 was chosen is that this is the age that the risk of a chromosomal anomaly outweighs the risk of miscarriage due to amnio - roughly 1/200. There is no big jump in risk at that age, it's just that this is the point where it seemed to make sense to do the amnio. Yes. However, now if you get a good level 2 ultrasound, your risk from amniocentesis becomes higher than from chromosomal damage. We did that and that infamous blood test every pregnancy, and since I had good blood levels and ultrasounds, my risk of abnormality was far, far lower than that! Just fyi. When I was 39 and pregnant (had my last baby at 40) my odds went down to something like 1/600 or maybe even lower after I did those tests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Bay Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 I talked about this here several times when Kai was younger. I wondered when I'd stop feeling like I'm supposed to have another. Now I understand my friends with older kids who look forward with longing to grandchildren. When I have baby longings (dh was DONE with 3, and went to the doctor to be sure) I tell myself that it is my longings to have grandchildren. If dh would adopt, I'd love to adopt, but I also understand that for him, three is his limit. He grew up in a small quiet family, I grew up in a mid-sized (5 kids) noisy family. Then, if I feel really badly, I remind myself that I have 3 healthy children while some of my friends weren't able to have any or more than 1 (basically, I talk myself into a more thankful for the glass half full mindset!) Babies usually really like me, which doesn't help. They tend to like my voice for some reason, which may be inherited or picked up by my mother, who is a baby magnet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elaine Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Congratulations!!:D I was afriad I was going to let the cat out of the bag so I haven't been posting.:lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlett Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Congrats!!! What a joy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Tara~ Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Congratulations!! I think going from 1 to 2 was the hardest. No big deal adding on more from there, it all just kinda fell into place ;) As for 35 being 'high risk' ... well, the medical profession may try to label you as that. But don't buy into it. I, personally, don't believe age automatically makes you 'high risk'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Dominion Heather Posted April 29, 2008 Author Share Posted April 29, 2008 Congratulations!!:D I was afriad I was going to let the cat out of the bag so I haven't been posting.:lol: I'm not good at secrets, especially when it comes to people who only know me and no one else in my family. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kortney in AL Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 My biggest adjustment was going from two to three. When I had my fourth child it didn't seem like any big deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mom2jrcsc Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Can't help with the 3 to 4. I went from 1 to 4 - Now that was an adjustment. But I can tell you that 4 to 5 was a piece of cake, but that may have just been relative to the previous increase. The older kids do help out alot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarynB Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 I had a much harder time with just my first 2. They are only 2 years apart so I had a toddler and a newborn and since neither could independently do anything it was a little exhausting. We now have 5: DD 6, DD 4, DS 2, DD 17 months and DD 6 months. I'm still exhausted, but I think after the third comes along it's really no big deal and your older children will be able to help you so that makes it easier in some ways as well. As far as the diapers go, my 2yo DS has NO interest in potty training so I've been stuck with diapers for 6 years STRAIGHT and now have 3 in diapers at the same time....sigh...I look forward to the end of diaper days as well. 8-) Congratulations to you and your husband! Blessings, Caryn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIY-DY Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 1. If I will be thirty-five when I deliver, does that put me in the high-risk category? I wouldn't think so. I think that 35, as the magic age of "high risk", has changed over the last few years, as many women are having perfectly fine pregnancies and births at that point, and beyond. Just be good to yourself, as usual. kwim? 2. Three to four... how much of a psychological jump for dh and I should I expect? You already moved from man-on-man defense to zone defense when you had #3 - same approach, but with one more man on the field. Plus, the other players knows the rules of the game better now, so it's more of a team effort. ;) 3. Will I ever have a time when I don't have to buy diapers? Because when this kids is born, I'll have been changing diapers for 9+ year. 9+ YEARS!!! Yes, and it will be better than *insert huge rite of passage that you waited forever for, here* (for me, that was finally getting booKs - and I thought it would never happen - I imagine the day of the last diaper change will feel THAT good!) :D And finally, :party: CONGRATULATIONS!!! Kiss that baby! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kate in Arabia Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 I don't really have any advice about the 3 to 4 thing (I'm hoping we're done at 3), but I wanted to say congratulations! I had my youngest (now 3 yrs) at 36, and was not considered high risk. Take care of yourself, everything will be fine! Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Going from three to four wasn't hard, but my circumstances made it harder. My oldest hadn't turned four yet, and the birth of my fourth occurred at a time when my husband had to work a lot of overtime (for three months after the birth). It was a lot of work for me, but I wouldn't trade it for anything. Our fourth is joyful and outgoing. I couldn't imagine life without her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Virginia Dawn Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Congratulations. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.