MariannNOVA Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 http://news.aol.com/health/article/uk-coroner-says-tumor-likely-killed-girl/691369 Didn't really say a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desert Rat Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Thank you for the follow up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiff in TX Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Wow, thanks for sharing. There seemed to be quite a few people with pitch forks and torches after the first thread was posted about this occurance. I guess this just helps prove that facts are always needed in a case like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hornblower Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 longer story at the bbc http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/coventry_warwickshire/8284517.stm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spy Car Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Thank goodness no one got hysterical :D Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tammy Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 and they are still searching for the 'cause'....which could very well have nothing to do with the vaccine....but it isn't over just yet, LOL! I feel a hysteria coming on, LOL. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6packofun Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 (edited) "Cancer jab girl??" That seems kind of disrespectful to me. :glare: I just don't get the complete refusal of so many people to make a link between all of these "coincidental" deaths. And not just with this vaccine. I think that most people with skepticism about vaccines are simply suspicious that vaccines can *trigger* a serious effect in someone with an underlying condition or even genetic trait which would, logically, IMO, merit a lot more research--NOT making a direct connection that vaccine=death for just anyone. That's not hysterical to me (this is a general post that happened to land here, not a response to any one post in this thread). It's not an all or nothing scenario. But apparently this girl's parents are satisfied so that's one more case that won't be studied further. Edited October 1, 2009 by 6packofun ./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tammy Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 I agree! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cin Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 "Cancer jab girl??" That seems kind of disrespectful to me. :glare: Don't know for certain, but I thought, from the way it was written that JAB is a British word for shot. I thought it sounded bad too, but in the article they refer to the 'jab'. Cancer shot girl sounds a little better. Sorta like bumbershoot and umbrella. Or ru66ers and galoshes and snowboots. (at 42, DH still cannot keep a straight face when her hears that one!!):001_rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarlaS Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 I've heard that if any normal healthy person was autopsied after death, they could find a number of things that might theoretically have killed you. Doesn't prove any of them did (especially if there's a bullet hole...). Does anyone else think they might have been looking pretty hard for another possible cause? I'm not convinced--not yet anyway. They haven't proven anything (neither side has). I doubt they'll keep looking though. This is funny (but not in a humorous way of course) "The government has said it has great confidence in the safety of its cervical cancer vaccination programme." What else are they going to say? It may be dangerous, but we are doing it anyway? :confused: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wendi Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Doesn't sound like they had to look too hard. A tumor infiltrating her heart and lungs? It's not like it was some minor-sounding, obscure thing. It's not hard for me to believe a tumor infiltrating one's heart and lungs could cause said person to collapse and die. Wendi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmoira Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 I've heard that if any normal healthy person was autopsied after death, they could find a number of things that might theoretically have killed you. Doesn't prove any of them did (especially if there's a bullet hole...). Does anyone else think they might have been looking pretty hard for another possible cause? I'm not convinced--not yet anyway. They haven't proven anything (neither side has). I doubt they'll keep looking though. Huh? She had a malignant tumor "so severe that death could have arrived at any point." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.