Jump to content

Menu

Generation X parents


Recommended Posts

This is so true for us:

 

They will evaluate the transaction on the basis of the value it appears to offer. If it doesn’t offer the right value, they will take their business elsewhere — whether another school district, a charter school, a private school or home schooling. It is practically impossible to persuade most Gen-X parents they should relinquish their choice for the sake of some great public good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've definitely taken my business elsewhere! :)
Same here. I cracked up when I read
Some Xers may skip the discussion stage entirely and move immediately to a decisive action — suddenly filing a lawsuit, for example, or withdrawing their child from a school with no warning.
I wasn't even considering homeschooling when I reached the end of my patience with my daughter's school and took her out. The principal was a Boomer, so she was foolish enough to tell me that I shouldn't do it and should trust her expertise. :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fascinating. I am actually a in the Millenial Generation (aka Gen Y), but I'm right on the cusp, so while I can relate to some of the things he's saying, some of them I can't. I'd be interested to see his take on my generation.

 

ETA that according to his timeline, my son is also in my generation, my husband is Gen X, and my daughter is Homeland... interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, assume no trust. Given their generally positive or at least empowering experience with education institutions, Boomers generally have trusted the school bureaucracy to do right by their children. Not today’s younger parents. Schools must gird themselves for Xers who feel they have no reason to trust the schools’ competence — and take steps to justify their performance in every area, from physical safety to academic achievement.

 

As Gen-X parents generate a rising demand for a wide spectrum of educational choices and credential substitutes over the next couple of decades, other Gen Xers entering midlife are likely to rise up to meet this demand. Gen-X entrepreneurs will find ways to provide new options outside the traditional school setting, through auxiliary programs, online courses, career modules and home-schooling aids. Gen-X info-tech designers will steadily improve the efficacy, flexibility, interactivity and entertainment value of teaching tools.

 

Meanwhile, as Gen-X voters, executives and elected officials replace Boomers in top leadership roles, they may agree to relax the credentials and help legitimize these end runs around the system. K-12 schools can deal with these new options by working with them, adopting them or outcompeting them. They cannot simply ignore them.

 

These both spoke to me. I am mildly grossed out by the concept of "rebranding" schools, though. Sounds like the "feed" talking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a late Baby Boomer but I have to say that us late Baby Boomers weren't anything like the early ones. We were the kids who grew up with looking at hippies and riots. It wasn't something we wanted to emulate. We became adults in the Reagan years and trust but verify is a slogan from our time. It seems that the difference he outlines is between liberals and conservatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought parts of it were really interesting and valid, like:

If it doesn’t offer the right value, they will take their business elsewhere — whether another school district, a charter school, a private school or home schooling. It is practically impossible to persuade most Gen-X parents they should relinquish their choice for the sake of some great public good.

 

 

 

Other parts, such as:

Boomers always have cared deeply about the higher moral and civic goals of education, for the ultimate purpose (recall the ’60s!) of creating a more ethical and socially conscious community.

{snip}

Many Gen Xers believe they live in an individualistic world in which there is no common interest and people do best by looking out for their own interests.

convinced me that the person who wrote it is a boomer who entirely misunderstands his own and my generation!

 

Frankly, I look at the boomer generation as entirely materialistic (think hippies morph into yuppies) and obsessed with superficial fixes and outcomes.

 

I look at my own generation as rejecting the failed theories of boomer generation and wanting more for my own family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a late Baby Boomer but I have to say that us late Baby Boomers weren't anything like the early ones. We were the kids who grew up with looking at hippies and riots. It wasn't something we wanted to emulate. We became adults in the Reagan years and trust but verify is a slogan from our time. It seems that the difference he outlines is between liberals and conservatives.

 

I'm from that same generation (in fact both my older brothers were bona fide hippies). I agree with your first 2 sentences. But could you clarify further your last sentence? I'm not sure what you mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting article. Working with kids in church classes, I noticed a HUGE difference in kids' attitudes when the current graduating class was entering 6th grade...that would be what? 2007? I noticed it in community-wide events, not just my own church. It was a huge shift that left an impression on me mostly because I couldn't figure out where it had come from and how it came about seemingly overnight. It never occurred to me that it could be generational differences in the parents. Interesting thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These both spoke to me. I am mildly grossed out by the concept of "rebranding" schools, though. Sounds like the "feed" talking.

 

That creeped me out as well.

 

I also took the author's comparison as:

 

Boomers = "it takes a village"

 

Gen X = "I'm not letting the village anywhere near my kid"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last sentence was referring to what another person noted as the "it takes a village" idea. The ideas he was saying that boomers had like let's make everything fair (redistributing tax revenues from wealthy school districts to poor school districts), busing, and thinking that the school should focus on the poorest students are traditional liberal ideas. Ideas like having competition in schools (school choice) and each individual making the best choices for himself or herself are traditionally conservative ideas. Liberal: It takes a village. Conservative: It takes a family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last sentence was referring to what another person noted as the "it takes a village" idea. The ideas he was saying that boomers had like let's make everything fair (redistributing tax revenues from wealthy school districts to poor school districts), busing, and thinking that the school should focus on the poorest students are traditional liberal ideas. Ideas like having competition in schools (school choice) and each individual making the best choices for himself or herself are traditionally conservative ideas. Liberal: It takes a village. Conservative: It takes a family.

 

Ah - gotcha. I'm unabashedly on the "it takes a family" side. But technically I am one of the last of the boomers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...