Hoggirl Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-admissions-group-votes-to-allow-more-aggressive-student-recruiting-11569701995 There is a pop-up about subscribing, but I was able to close it? Hope no one hits a paywall. This article from Forbes (though written before the NACAC vote) hypothesizes on what the changes mean. My favorite line is about recruiting past the May 1 date - “This feels kind of like trying to court women in a bridal shop.” 😂 https://www.forbes.com/sites/brennanbarnard/2019/09/05/the-department-of-justice-aims-to-unravel-the-college-admission-market/#762e7b3740e5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootAnn Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 I had not heard about any of these. I can't imagine this is going to have a positive effect on the process. What is the DOJ thinking? While in certain cases it might be good, I think it'll cause more stress & conflict for most. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilaclady Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 I heard about it about 2 weeks ago and I do agree with the PP. it will just drag the already long process out into AP exam time and summer for the students. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastian (a lady) Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 I think it's really tough to anticipate how college practices will change in light of the removal of these parts of the NACAC code of ethics. New practices will depend a lot on where a college is on the selectivity (what percentage they accept) and yield (what percentage of accepted students attend) spectrum. I expect the most change with schools who have lower yields. They are trying to fill a class and may make late offers to do so. This might mean holding some financial aid in reserve, or offering honors college to students who were on the fence, or reaching out to students who didn't complete an application. A student who isn't interested can say Thanks, but no thanks. But it might be good news for students in some situations. Take the Virginia Tech scenario of higher than expected yield and a historic large freshman class. If other colleges in the area reached out with a pot sweetener, some number of students might decide that George Mason or NC State actually was a better fit than an overfilled VT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootAnn Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 DD's inbox started to slow down near the end of April, but this seems to indicate schools may continue to inundate applicants post-May 1. Yuck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJosMom Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 (edited) Paywall. 😞 Summary anyone? NM. Went here https://www.nacacnet.org/news--publications/newsroom/press-releases/2019-national-conference-highlights/ Also https://www.nacacnet.org/about/governance/assembly/report-of-the-2019-assembly/ That last link has a link to a PDF. Edited October 4, 2019 by JoJosMom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.