monalisa Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 I'm going to buy the Usborne Internet Linked World History Encycyclopedia. Is it worth it to pay the extra for hardback? Since it is such a huge book, I wonder if the paperback will get beat up quickly. I'm leaning toward hardback but am just wondering about anyone else's experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwickimom Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 I just bought the paperback and thus havent used it but I will say I am impressed by how sturdy it feels. The cover, spine, and pages are pretty thick. I checked out the hardcover form the library and it is huge. I do like the size of the paperback better also :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsiew Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 We have the paperback... we're happy with it. We haven't used it a ton, but like the pp said, it's sturdy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HollyB Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 I bought the hardcover because I have more than one child who would be using it, so more wear and tear off the shelf. That may not be an issue for you, as your child probably isn't as rough on books as my kids are. The paperback does look quite sturdy, and you could always cover it with clear contact paper to reinforce it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susie in CA Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Unless they changed something, the paper back is a smaller book. I mean it is samller in size not in content. I prefer the standard enc. size because it is easier to read. We have had ours for 6 or 7 years. I consider that money well spent. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlebug42 Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Unless they changed something, the paper back is a smaller book. I mean it is samller in size not in content. I prefer the standard enc. size because it is easier to read. We have had ours for 6 or 7 years. I consider that money well spent. Susie I have had both and I prefer the hardbacks. I think they are easier to read as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staceyshoe Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 I got the hardback. We also have UIL Science Encyclopedia in paperback, and pages were falling out after 2 months because ds was creasing the page open to where he wanted to read so it didn't flop closed while he was on the computer. (A person only has so many hands, you know.:D) Because of this, I sprung for the hardcover of UILE of World History. Worth every penny for us! I didn't realize that the book was so much larger, but actually that suits us also since ds is much more likely to read a book with larger font and pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HollyDay Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 We have the hardbacks as well for several of the encyclopedias from Usborne. I bought hardback mainly because we would be using it for several years with multiple children and I wanted to be sure it would stand up to the test. Our paperback Usbornes have been okay, but we have not used them as much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorax Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 We've used ours pretty much constantly for the last four years. With the wear it's showing, I think a soft cover would have been toast by now. :-) This is with one grammar stage daughter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.