UncleEJ Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I have been thinking about writing a Dr Hive post for a while, but it will be long and lots of questions. I thought maybe I would ask a couple questions separately. What is considered to be a fever? Is it a temperature over a certain point? Regardless of your baseline temperature? Or a certain amount of change from your personal baseline? If "normal" temperature is 98.6, and a fever is 99 or higher, then that's a change of only .4 degrees. My baseline temp is low, between 97.3 and 97.5. So what would a fever be for me? Would it be 98 or higher? Or not until 99 like those whose baseline temp is 98.6? I guess what I am asking is a specific number considered a fever or a certain amount of change from normal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainySunday Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 This is from Seattle Children's: "Rectal, Ear or Temporal Artery (TA) temperature: 100.4° F (38.0° C) or higher Oral or Pacifier temperature: 100° F (37.8° C) or higher Under the arm (Axillary or armpit) temperature: 99° F (37.2° C) or higher" I think, technically, a fever is defined by the actual temp, not the degrees above your start point. However, personally, I do always mention to the kids' (or my) doc that we generally run cool. I am more concerned about a 99.x, or 100.x than most people, because all three kids and I run in the 97s (low 97s for me). We are all so consistent, that a noticeable deviation into the "low-grade" fever range is significant (not serious necessarily). In practice, it doesn't really matter, for us, because I don't treat a fever until much higher than that, and it's usually behavior-based. I will sometimes give a fever reducer at night, before bed, if it's pushing 101 ish, or higher, as there is a history of spiking a very high temp (104+) overnight, in our family. Otherwise, I monitor it, and let the fever do its job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pawz4me Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 In general I think anything over 100 is considered a fever. My normal temp tends to run low (around 97.5 - 98) so if I hit 99 I consider it a fever. As a general rule I don't even think about treating fevers of less than 101. Unless somebody's feeling really awful, I prefer to let the immune system do it's job w/o interference. A fever is a symptom, not a problem in and of itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktgrok Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Funny, my son looked this up today. Medically, over 100 is a fever. But I think that's just to say that if it is over 100 it is definitely a fever, no matter what your normal is. Below that, it MIGHT be a fever, depending. Personally, if it is higher than the norm, I call it a fever. My son today was 99.5. By the books not a fever. But I know he runs right at 98 normally, and he felt "warm" to me, and I said no, you can't go to co-op. And I was right...it's now up to 101. So yeah..I don't care what the book says :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mytwomonkeys Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 In general I think anything over 100 is considered a fever. My normal temp tends to run low (around 97.5 - 98) so if I hit 99 I consider it a fever. As a general rule I don't even think about treating fevers of less than 101. Unless somebody's feeling really awful, I prefer to let the immune system do it's job w/o interference. A fever is a symptom, not a problem in and of itself. This is me as well. My normal runs low, so 99 feels feverish for me. I feel chilled and achy at this point usually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catwoman Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Funny, my son looked this up today. Medically, over 100 is a fever. But I think that's just to say that if it is over 100 it is definitely a fever, no matter what your normal is. Below that, it MIGHT be a fever, depending. Personally, if it is higher than the norm, I call it a fever. My son today was 99.5. By the books not a fever. But I know he runs right at 98 normally, and he felt "warm" to me, and I said no, you can't go to co-op. And I was right...it's now up to 101. So yeah..I don't care what the book says :) I hope your son feels better soon, Katie! :grouphug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktgrok Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I hope your son feels better soon, Katie! :grouphug: Thanks, me too. He was mad about missing the first co-op this year, plus we have a valentines party on thursday. 1 year old also has a fever, 4 year old is on antibiotics for double ear infection. And I'm on the tail end of the same bug. this is right after hand/foot/mouth last week....as soon as the blisters went away this other crud started. I am so sick of sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleEJ Posted February 11, 2014 Author Share Posted February 11, 2014 Thanks. The reason I ask is because I have been having low grade fevers everyday for a long time. I wake up normal (97.3-97.5) and by noon am creeping up to the 99.1-99.9 range. Everyday. My dr doesn't seem very worried because it is low grade but that is a two to almost three degree change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.