Jump to content

Menu

Science vs History


Recommended Posts

My family is a science family. We love history, but science is our passion. I am finding that my son does not have the time to do both well. Currently, he is reading science textbooks and watching lectures for about 5 hours per week, and then my dh reads history books from the library to both boys (age 10 and 7) at night averaging 3 hours/week. What I am finding is that my ds has a deep knowledge of both subjects, but is moving into the logic stage more quickly with science because of more time, interest, and independent working with the material. The logic stage skills of reading, outlining, analyzing, researching, writing,experimenting etc are being met with science, but also the organizing your time, working independently with a text etc. For history he is more a passive absorber, although my dh does try to pull him into more "logic stage" discussions. Ds also reads books like "persian fire" and "the Rubicon" on his own, both adult level entry books to the subject, so he his not inept, just more passive! He has also written some summaries of people, written a couple of reports, and done a bit of time lining, but this is minimal compared to what is recommended in TWTM

 

From my point of view, both subjects are being learned, but only one with skills. So here are my questions:

 

1)Can you learn logic stage skills with any subject and then easily apply them to a different subject?

 

2)There seems to be just not enough time for everything, and we want to focus on science. Because my ds has less time available for history, what would you rank the highest for logic-stage skills in history, that would not be easily transfered from what he has learned in science?

 

Thoughts?

 

ruth in NZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, after homeschooling all these years, my biggest regret is that we didn't focus more on science and spent too much with history.

 

I'm pretty sure that I'm one of the rare few that think science is more important in teaching critical thinking than history is.

 

In MY opinion, with science one learns the needed critical thinking skills for life; the questioning and the inquiry, both of which are desperately needed when faced with propaganda or skewed history. The thing that studying history provides is more of an opportunity to use those scientific skills with intangible ideas.

 

I hope that makes sense. Go with science, if that is your family's passion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that you can teach logic stage critical thinking in science just as well as history, so I wouldn't worry about that.

 

I would make sure he is learning history through the logic stage. The information will have a different impact since he is now learning it from a "logic" mindset instead of a "grammar" mindset. Sounds like you are doing a great job at that.

 

Chris in SC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have the same problem. Just not enough time. We'll be doing a lot of science and history over the summer. This year was especially hard as we had a large Language arts focus to get those writing skills more automatic so that the writing in science and history doesn't take as much time.

 

I'm thinking about PP schedule of 2weeks of daily history and 2 weeks of daily science. We actually do better w/ blocks like that for science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that you absolutely can learn logic stage skills via science studies as opposed to history studies and think your plan sounds just fine! I don't know what you're reading aloud from for history, but SWB's History of the Ancient/Medieval Worlds might work for you (some more adult content, but you could edit as you read).... You could also use her Well Educated Mind as a guide to choosing other works to read from as you go....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll bet that any social science skills, that cannot be taught with science, will be covered in a GED prep book. I haven't seen a GED prep book in awhile, but I remember them as being skills, not content based. It might be worth taking a glance at a workbook and seeing if it might be worth orally doing a lesson once a week. They are mostly just comprehension of a chart and a short reading I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am facing the same dilemma but flipped. My older finds history more to his liking. My second, science. I do not think dropping history as a formal subject is going to hamper any child's ability to take a test and succeed in University. I agree with the poster who said the following.

 

"In MY opinion, with science one learns the needed critical thinking skills for life; the questioning and the inquiry, both of which are desperately needed when faced with propaganda or skewed history. The thing that studying history provides is more of an opportunity to use those scientific skills with intangible ideas."

 

 

Go with the passion. Make home school happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you looked at the Story of Science by Hakim? We're really impressed here about the way it ties science into history... giving it a context and connecting it with culture and religion and math and politics and everything. My older daughter and I love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...