Jump to content

Menu

Art of Argument question


tjarnold
 Share

Recommended Posts

From what I can see of online samples, it appears that The Art of Argument is basically self-directed by the student. The purpose of the teacher's manual appears to be mostly to provide answers to text questions, quizzes, and tests.

 

Can anyone tell me if this impression is correct?

 

I'm looking for a logic/critical thinking program that won't require much involvement on my part. There simply isn't enough time in my day ...

 

Tiffany

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I've been using The Art of Argument with my 8th grader since September. I would not use it as a self-directed text.

 

We discuss the chapters/sections and find samples of the arguments presented in newspapers and magazines. We read the scripted dialogues together and discuss.

 

I would not set the text before a student to go through without some guidance. The answer key/teacher's guide is a tad disappointing. It could provide more background information for the parent/teacher to round out discussions by providing examples. I do like The Art of Argument better than Traditional Logic which I found to be very teacher intensive.

 

Unless you were to find an online class or CD-Rom to teach logic/argument, I think teacher participation is mandatory. How much emphasis you put on the lessons, how many times a week you conduct your class, will determine your involvement. I think the heart of teaching logic and argument is the discussion you have with your student, but this is my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I've been using The Art of Argument with my 8th grader since September. I would not use it as a self-directed text.

 

We discuss the chapters/sections and find samples of the arguments presented in newspapers and magazines. We read the scripted dialogues together and discuss.

 

I would not set the text before a student to go through without some guidance. The answer key/teacher's guide is a tad disappointing. It could provide more background information for the parent/teacher to round out discussions by providing examples. I do like The Art of Argument better than Traditional Logic which I found to be very teacher intensive.

 

Unless you were to find an online class or CD-Rom to teach logic/argument, I think teacher participation is mandatory. How much emphasis you put on the lessons, how many times a week you conduct your class, will determine your involvement. I think the heart of teaching logic and argument is the discussion you have with your student, but this is my opinion.

 

How much time do you spend on this each week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just so you know, the Art of Argument was thoroughly edited last year and addressed the concerns expressed in the thread dating back to 2008.

 

Best,

C. Perrin

 

Then the editing removed the material related to more mature issues in current events? If so, then I may put it back on my list. Does anyone know?

 

Shannon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then the editing removed the material related to more mature issues in current events? If so, then I may put it back on my list. Does anyone know?

 

Shannon

 

I have the 2008 version and the only objectionable thing we have come across so far is the story of Jane Roe being raped in a hotel room. I folded the page and taped it shut. The program works just fine w/o that page.

 

My son said he like the Fallacy Detective much better and that they cover the same material. He did FD mostly on his own and we would discuss it once every couple of weeks. He learned a lot from FD, that he applies to his everyday life.

 

With AA we do it together orally because it expects a lot of writing and I think the answers are unclear. The TM is a total disappointment. The best part about the program are all the fake ads using fallacies. The book might be worth having just for that, but I am sure you could hunt and find your own ads. We are an ad free house though, so I wouldn't have access to them other than to buy old magazines from a thrift store. I don't know if I will do AA with my other kids, but we will definitely do Fallacy Detective and Thinking Toolbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To help with some more details about the new edition:

 

The intention of the rewrite was for several purposes. First to make the entire book as neutral (politically, sociologically, religiously) as possible, or at least to try to be fair to both sides of any given story. Second, to update many examples that have just become too dated for students. Third, to simply provide many more examples of all kinds, using sports, technology, business, and more.

 

To address abortion specifically, there are still a couple places where abortion is discussed, but several others, including the Jane Roe example (which is where rape would also have been mentioned) have been replaced.

 

This new version is now copyright 2010, and is Version 8.

 

Personally, I also think it is a vast improvement, and really appreciate the work that went in to these updates!

 

Hope this helps!

 

ETA: Also, we recommend the book beginning at 7th or 8th grade, so we hope that these issues (which are toned down now anyway) would be appropriate to discuss.

Edited by Joanna from CAP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...