Jump to content

Menu

No big surprise but DNA confirms


Recommended Posts

This is just sickening. Yes -- that poor, sweet baby.

 

In reading the article, I'm just at a total loss. I understand that the area was flooded, making the search difficult. But if the meter reader reported seeing a bag there, why couldn't others see/find it? Why wouldn't the deputy investigating the tip follow-up and simply have the witness *show* him where the bag was? How much evidence has been lost because of the delay? There will be more about this, I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is absurd that they didn't take the tip more seriously the other, what FOUR times they were pointed in that direction. And I sure hope they know what they are doing convicting the mother. Can you imagine *if* she wasn't the one who did it? Can you imagine losing your child and then being falsely convicted for his/her murder. OMG! I just hope they have the right person. What kind of monster could kill a 3 year old child???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...