Jump to content

Menu

Best first Shakespeare play for boys


Emily ZL
 Share

Recommended Posts

I want to start Shakespeare with my 5th grade son next year, starting with one play and seeing how it goes. We will be trying the Mystie Winkler approach of: 1. Introducing the Bard using picture book biographies 2. Memorizing an excerpt from the play 3. Reading a picture book version of the play 4. Watching a good movie version of the play 5. Listening to an audiobook version while following along in the text.

So I am hoping people know which plays speak to boys (no Romeo and Juliet!), preferably with good picture book versions and movie options to go with. Bonus if there's a good audio version too!! Any suggestions?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JMO: not sure you really NEED to read/listen to the full text at the grade 5 level -- watching a full play (live production if possible!) is going to be much more interesting. And you get all the language from the text in watching a production. And it's easier to understand (than trying to read/listen to audio), when performed by good actors. You could save the actual reading of the text for high school, when also digging deeper into the themes and language. Just a thought!

Macbeth is my thought for a great "boys" play (and it's the play I love doing with my high school classes), BUT... probably not the best for 5th grade. Most of the film/video productions of that play are rather gruesome and disturbing in some way or another. Perhaps:

A Midsummer Night's Dream
- picture book retelling = Bruce Coville
- younger reader retelling = Mairi Mackinnon
- "comic strip" version = Tales from Shakespeare (Williams)
- retelling, slightly older/harder language = Leon Garfield; E. Nesbit; or Charles Lamb
- watch the 25-min abridged Animated Shakespeare version -- all original text/language, but in a shortened version 

The Tempest
- very simple/short picture book retelling = Georghia Ellinas
- picture book retelling = Bruce Coville
- younger reader retelling = Rosie Dickens
- "comic strip" version = Tales from Shakespeare (Williams)
- retelling, slightly older/harder language = Leon Garfield; E. Nesbit; or Charles Lamb
- watch the 25-min abridged Animated Shakespeare version -- all original text/language, but in a shortened version 


and, some general resources for Shakespeare:
- Who Was William Shakespeare (Mannis) -- biography
- William Shakespeare's & The Globe (Aliki)
- Kids Discover magazine back issue: Shakespeare -- or, the online unit
- The Shakespeare Book: Big Ideas Fully Explained (DK publishers)
- Shakespeare for Kids: His Life and Times (Aagesen) -- with 21 activities
- Folger Shakespeare Library: Shakespeare for Kids -- free online lessons, resources, activities
- How to Teach Shakespeare to Your Children (Ludwig)

Edited by Lori D.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Emily ZL said:

I've noticed that the modern(ized) versions of Macbeth are pretty gruesome. Would that be true of older versions as well?


You mean true of tv/film versions? Well, you definitely do NOT want the older (1971) Roman Polanski film, which was made right after his pregnant wife, Sharon Tate, and several friends were very bloodily slain (multiple stabbings) in Polanski's home by Charles Manson and crew. Polanski was definitely working out some of his trauma in that film.

I watched parts of the 1948 Orson Welles version; it's a little odd. And it is abridged. Probably the most straight-forward/least bloody/least weird (lol) version that I know of is the 1983 BBC Television Shakespeare version. (Part of a televised play series in which the BBC did all of Shakespeare's plays over the course of several years.) See it at Amazon Prime Video.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 8FillTheHeart said:

Dont watch the Patrick Stewart version. It's a gruesome version. Excellent, but nightmare worthy. 


Agree... But, I do have to say that the choice of a WW1 setting was incredibly fitting, and extremely creative. It really added a whole new dimension to the play. But... gruesome, yes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lori D. said:


Agree... But, I do have to say that the choice of a WW1 setting was incredibly fitting, and extremely creative. It really added a whole new dimension to the play. But... gruesome, yes.

I agree that the WW1 setting worked incredibly well, but, on my, the witches as nurses.....that did give one of my dd's nightmares.  

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My kids (6 and 8 years old) both really liked a Midsummer Night's Dream (retold, not in the original language). It has fairies and magic and someone with a donkey's head, so it was a lot of fun for them. We also recently read a retelling of Comedy of Errors, which is all about mistaken identity. My eight year old found in HILARIOUS and followed the twists and turns way better than I thought he would, so that could be a good one.

I hadn't even thought of Julius Caesar. That's such a good idea.

 

 

 

Edited by Little Green Leaves
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...