Jump to content

Menu

Saxon Physics w/ Dive vs. Kinetics Physics for Engineers


Recommended Posts

Ok, I am all ears.

 

I need to pick a physics book and I have narrowed it down to these two. I need to have something self teaching with a solution manual for a student interested in possibly engineering or architecture.

 

I love the graphics of Kinetics physics, the coverage in their table of contents, and that it is calculus based. My gripe is that I can't get the Kinetics people to sell me a solution manual, which could be a deal breaker if my kid gets stuck because I will not be much help.

 

With Saxon Physics, I like that Dive will have lectures to all the lessons and a solution manual included. I think it teaches the calculus that is necessary to solve the problems. Not sure of the coverage of topics is as extensive as compared to Saxon.

 

What to do? Help Please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the graphics of Kinetics physics, the coverage in their table of contents, and that it is calculus based. My gripe is that I can't get the Kinetics people to sell me a solution manual, which could be a deal breaker if my kid gets stuck because I will not be much help.

 

With Saxon Physics, I like that Dive will have lectures to all the lessons and a solution manual included. I think it teaches the calculus that is necessary to solve the problems. Not sure of the coverage of topics is as extensive as compared to Saxon.

 

 

I was under the impression that Saxon Physics is algebra based, not calculus based. ???

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you register for a single course, you can purchase a solution's manual for KB from Kolbe.

Yes, I checked out Kolbe, but they use the Priniciples Physics version, not the version for "Scientists and Engingeers".... And I kinda wanted this version. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that Saxon Physics is algebra based, not calculus based. ???

You may be right about that, I wasn't completely certain as I only have second hand knowledge and have never worked though any of there problem sets. Someone at some point reported to me that it was, but that could be erroneous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I checked out Kolbe, but they use the Priniciples Physics version, not the version for "Scientists and Engingeers".... And I kinda wanted this version. :(

My sr used th course back in8th grade, so my memories are definitely fuzzy. (In my life terms, that was a baby, a cross country move, a ds getting married and 2 grandbabies ago!!). ;)

 

But, I think, you really need to verify, that there is in reality only 1program and that the distinction is sections and problems. I am almost 100% positive that that is the only distinction between conceptual and principles, but I am not so sure about scientists/engineers. If it is, then you would have access to answers to a large portion of the course.

 

Eta: I just went on their website and the TOC and subsection contents for each program are viewable online. Just looking at those might answer whether or not it is worth even pursuing an actual answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so this is what I have found to compare.

 

Here is the Kinetics Physics for Engineers TOC:

http://www.kineticbooks.com/products/textbook/Physics%20for%20Scientists%20and%20Engineers/index.html

 

And here is the TOC for Saxon Physics:

http://www.exodusbooks.com/Samples/SAX/SaxPTOC.pdf

 

They each look really different, but maybe just the order that topics are introduced? What you you guys think? WWYPick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so this is what I have found to compare.

 

Here is the Kinetics Physics for Engineers TOC:

http://www.kineticbooks.com/products/textbook/Physics%20for%20Scientists%20and%20Engineers/index.html

 

And here is the TOC for Saxon Physics:

http://www.exodusbooks.com/Samples/SAX/SaxPTOC.pdf

 

They each look really different, but maybe just the order that topics are introduced? What you you guys think? WWYPick?

 

If it had to be between those two, there would be no question for me that I'd pick Kinetics. I dislike the disjointed way in which Saxon treats the material and prefer a more organic standard way of teaching (FWIW, I have been teaching physics at a university for 12 years)

 

This said, the programs are really not comparable: you first need to decide what you want in a physics program. Has your student had enough calculus to take a calculus based physics course, and is that what he wants?

I personally prefer to start a high school student with an algebra/trig based course and not right away with a calc based one for scientists and engineers, but I'd not choose Saxon for this purpose. YMMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another thread on Saxon physics: http://forums.welltrainedmind.com/topic/484323-saxon-physics/?hl=%2Bsaxon+%2Bphysics&do=findComment&comment=5140216

 

Saxon does have a little calculus (just polynomials), but is not really a calculus-based physics course.  That said, I just couldn't get into the way that Saxon teaches physics.  

 

I haven't decided 100%, but I'm pretty sure we'll do one of the Hewitt Conceptual books for physics.  We'd be ready for more, but we're doing multiple languages and plus I want to get in at least a semester of calculus.  The math is more important to me that a tough physics course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all very much, I really appreciate all the input. It has given me more to think about and consider. Such a tough thing to pick curricula for your student...keeping it interesting and engaging, but also academically solid...especially when the subject is not ( and never has been) appealing to the teacher. :) Thanks again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...