Chelle in MO Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Here's the deal...referring to Joseph and his brothers in the Bible, I think it's proper to say, "Joseph was loved more than they." I don't think it's grammatically correct to say, "Joseph was loved more than them." The problem is, I don't know how to explain that concept using English grammar rules, and I want to make sure my kids get it straight. Any help? Thanks, Chelle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Mungo Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Here's the deal...referring to Joseph and his brothers in the Bible, I think it's proper to say, "Joseph was loved more than they." I don't think it's grammatically correct to say, "Joseph was loved more than them." The problem is, I don't know how to explain that concept using English grammar rules, and I want to make sure my kids get it straight. Any help? Thanks, Chelle http://www.onestopenglish.com/section.asp?docid=146352 short version: 'They' is used to refer to the subject of a clause. In other words, it usually represents the ‘doers’ of the action described by the verb, and usually refers back to two or more people or things that were mentioned earlier Them is used to refer to the object of a clause. In other words, it usually represents the group of people or things that have ‘experienced’ the action described by the verb, and refers back to two or more people or things that were mentioned earlierPeople are always getting tripped up with passive voice. In this case, it is sort of hedging. If you mean "Their father loved Joseph more" you should just say it. Maybe he had a good reason, they were jerks who left their brother in a hole to die/sold their brother into slavery, after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Time Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 (edited) Here's the deal...referring to Joseph and his brothers in the Bible, I think it's proper to say, "Joseph was loved more than they." I don't think it's grammatically correct to say, "Joseph was loved more than them." The problem is, I don't know how to explain that concept using English grammar rules, and I want to make sure my kids get it straight. Any help? Thanks, Chelle I'll take a shot here! Yes, they is correct. The reason this sentence is such a bugger is that it is passive. It would be better to change the sentence: They were loved less than Joseph. If you must keep the passive, then it would be more correct and clear this way: Joseph was loved more than they were loved. It is tempting to use "them" thinking it is the direct object of the verb or an object of a preposition, but it isn't. It becomes clear when you write it this way that "them" would be all wrong! Joseph was loved more than them were loved. :ack2: ********* Oh, yeah! Ms. Mungo has a better alternative sentence. Their father loved Joseph more. Mine was still passive trying to stay close to your sentence - still awkward. Rarely do passive sentences make for strong writing, except when used by brilliant minds. I'll "pass" on the "passive"! Good link she gave, too! Edited December 1, 2009 by Tea Time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ekarl2 Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Here's the deal...referring to Joseph and his brothers in the Bible, I think it's proper to say, "Joseph was loved more than they." I don't think it's grammatically correct to say, "Joseph was loved more than them." The problem is, I don't know how to explain that concept using English grammar rules, and I want to make sure my kids get it straight. Any help? Thanks, Chelle This was taken fromn the grammargirl.com web site and I think it's an excellent explination. Than is both a subordinating conjunction, as in She is wiser than I am, and a preposition, as in She is wiser than me.... Since the following verb am is often dropped or “understood,†we regularly hear than I and than me. So remember, than he and than him are both defensible, but not all grammar mavens feel this way. Therefore, I would avoid the prepositional use in formal settings, such as a research paper or job interview—and I would argue, advertising, but Cadbury obviously feels otherwise. The usage note in The American Heritage Dictionary (4) agrees: “The writer who risks a sentence like Mary is taller than him in formal writing must be prepared to defend the usage against objections of critics.†Unfortunately, defending your grammar during an interview is not the best way to make a good impression. Basically, this is something about which grammarians argue. I tend to be on the subordinating conjunction side ... but others would easily argue that it's a preposition. To me, if you can put a verb after it, "than they are ..." you should use the subjective case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelle in MO Posted December 1, 2009 Author Share Posted December 1, 2009 Super, you guys! Your replies help a lot! Thank you! Chelle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angela in ohio Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 My argument: When you can make a perfectly good argument for "than" being a prepositions, and the sentence stands on its own, it seems silly to me to worry about adding assumed wording to it. If you mean "Joseph was loved more than they were loved." then I think you should just say that. If not, it is acting as a preposition. You can argue for either "them" or "they," and I would mark either correct on a student's paper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.