Jump to content



  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


3,816 Excellent

About WishboneDawn

  • Birthday 09/30/1973

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada

Contact Methods

  • Location
    Nova Scotia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Any IB Theory of Knowledge text. The more my daughter and I explore this the more I can't believe this isn't something most Classical homeschoolers use. We talk about critical thinking, philosophy, teach logic and rhetoric and yet the big kahuna, the umbrella over those things barely gets a mention here.
  2. It's sort of funny because it's often a toss up as to exactly what he's most famous for here: that he's an actor, he's Donald Sutherland's son, or that he's Tommy Douglas' grandson. Poor guy. :-)
  3. Just an aside, the man who we Canadians credit for starting health care was Tommy Douglas, a Baptist minister.
  4. I apologize. I did not intend it that way. It was awkwardly worded and then further mangling by my Swype keyboard made it seem worse. I should have learned by now that posting from my phone is a bad idea. My first paragraph was in response to you, The "small-minded and self-congratulatory" comments were meant for those the OP mentioned in her first paragraph. I don't think saying there's a moral element to the choice to quit is small-minded, I think the judgement experienced by the OP are. There may be a moral element to the choice to smoke/quit smoking for some (I'm not sure I'd allow that that is always the case) but to judge people because they smoke or because they're fat or have cancer or asthma...That's when someone goes into the territory of small-mindedness. I don't think that's what you're doing.
  5. My apologies for contributing to the derail, Lexi.
  6. What about an online course? Maybe he needs to have his assumptions about what is fine challenged by someone other then his mother in order for him to understand?
  7. My husband doesn't smoke anymore but when he did he possessed the same strength of character and same set of morals as after he quit. You may ultimately be right in that it points to some small character flaw but to my mind there's no point in making a moral issue of it. It certainly small minded and self-congratulatory to assume that whether a person smokes our not tells you anything useful about their character or means they are somehow less then you by some measure as the OP relating.
  8. That is in fact how the Queen is already known in Canada. We beat you guys to that one!
  9. That's awesome. :D And it reminds me of an EFM meeting... This was a few years back. Our group was led by my male minister and had, I think, only one other guy at the time. There were several ministers taking the course and then we had the Bishop of our diocese visit us this one day. This was the day where all of my ideas about ministers and bishops being somehow apart from and above regular folks got exploded real good. We did theological reflection. Someone told a story, we explored thoughts and feelings, came up with a metaphor. The metaphor was passing a woman your sweater to wear around her waist when you notice she's having her period and, er, leaking. Lay people, ministers and bishop all thoroughly explored the metaphor. The guys got a very in depth education that day about all things related to menstration. And we came out of it finding a piece of scripture that spoke to that metaphor. My minister maintains that theology tends to get a lot earthier when there's a majority of women, Bishop, minister or whatever. :) So we discussed having our periods with our bishop and did some excellent theological work because of it. I think that's an awesome argument for ordaining women right there. :D
  10. It is overly simplified and I am biased. My sympathy is limited for those who choose to break the communion and then also want to take church property with them. The amount of money spent in litigation is, to me, pretty easy to understand. It should be clear to those congregations considering leaving the communion that they can't take CoE property with them. It could be debated here. It need someone on the other side of the fence though since, as you pointed out, I'm not presenting a fair and balanced view. I'm pretty biased. ETA: No, let's not debate it here. There's enough info on the internet for any that are curious. And it would seriously cramp my style in this thread. :D Besides, I might not win the debate and THAT can not be allowed to happen.
  11. Please forget I used the term historical document. I'm face palming right now. Ancient documents, Ancient stories...Something along that line. In was thinking historical in a slightly different sense and wasn't thinking about putting it and documents together would imply. I'm sure, but I asked you the question. I'm talking about methods for evaluating ancient (not historical!!! Sorry again!) documents. I'm sticking to that narrow piece of the pie for the time being. There are very well established methods for examining the Bible and there's a whole community of scholars out there for a person to check their opinions against. Many, if not most, are secular folks who are playing by well established rules and not inserting faith into the equation. That's something separate and apart from my liberal theology. I have no idea who "my" scholars are supposed to be. This is why I wonder about what you think that I think about the Bible. I spent a few years on the old Internet Infidels forum because they had excellent scholars there and my views on the Bible, on authorship and historical context and the like were pretty much in line with most of the folks there. When I'm looking for information I tend to go to secular academic sources, not apologetic ones. I could lose faith tommorrow (and I seriously could, I'm a serial teeterer) and my view on the Bible would be pretty much the same, sans a little bit of faith. So, does being a person of faith justify an unreasoned and irrational approach? You don't need to go into the Holy Ghost. That's Teannika's matter. I think you would consider that irrational anyway. I didn't ask what value it held for you, I asked what you thought that I think of the Bible because I think that colours the discussion with your talk of faith and "my" scholars. Sorry for not doing the quotes properly. I could last week but they've gone wonky on me.
  12. She is Supreme Governor of the Church of England. It's mostly a ceremonial and symbolic role from what I gather and seems to have been established mostly to keep Roman Catholic paws off the new CoE way back in Herny VIII's day. She's additionally known as the Defender of the Faith in much of the Commonwealth although what that means varies. We don't have a state religion in Canada so functionally it's more Defender of Faith here. Some commonwealth countries don't give her that title at all. The effective head of the church, however, is the Archbishop of Canterbury. The last one, Rowan Williams, was primarily known for his spooky eyebrows. The current one is...Someone. I'm sure of that. Ah, Justin Welby. No, I'm not googling all this as I type. Okay, I am, but that's allowed. Anyhow, the Archbishop of Canterbury isn't anything like the pope. I could call him an arsehat and no one would make an issue of it. My minister might wonder why I was stealing his bit though...Communion is paramount, not a single personality, however pointy his eyebrows. Rowan did rock the Royal Wedding though.
  13. We've had homemade bread. Can't escape crumbs there. :) I'm hoping that one day cheesecake is an acceptable host, can't see it though. :crying:
  • Create New...