Parrothead Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Dd is working on miles and tons in MUS Gamma. I think the word problem is misleading. What do you think the answer should be? A runaway horse galloped for three miles before it stopped. If the weary rancher walked after it for 21,000 feet before giving up, did he catch the horse? I say there is no need to figure out how many feet are in three miles and compare it to 21,000 feet because the problem says the rancher gave up looking. So no, he didn't catch the horse. The TE has the answer as 5280x3=15,840 then 15,840<21,00; yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deece in MN Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 You're right that the wording is misleading. :) You can understand what they are trying to convey and have the student do, but they really need to adjust the wording so it comes across how they intended. Have you contacted MUS to let them know? Maybe they can fix it in a future printing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrothead Posted November 20, 2008 Author Share Posted November 20, 2008 You're right that the wording is misleading. :) You can understand what they are trying to convey and have the student do, but they really need to adjust the wording so it comes across how they intended. Have you contacted MUS to let them know? Maybe they can fix it in a future printing. Yes, I contacted them through their "live help." The lady I conversed with said to just have dd do the problem as intended because there was no other way to word the problem that would convey the meaning they were looking for. Since dd knows how to do the problem, I let her have it with a no the rancher didn't catch the horse because he gave up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deece in MN Posted November 20, 2008 Share Posted November 20, 2008 Yes, I contacted them through their "live help." The lady I conversed with said to just have dd do the problem as intended because there was no other way to word the problem that would convey the meaning they were looking for. Since dd knows how to do the problem, I let her have it with a no the rancher didn't catch the horse because he gave up. Wow, interesting response! You would think they would come up with some other scenario to use for the question then. :confused: I think that is great that your dd pays attention as she reads word problems and caught that (my dc didn't catch that when we did MUS because they rush and don't really pay attention :glare:). And :thumbup: to you for giving her credit for her answer. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fivetails Posted November 20, 2008 Share Posted November 20, 2008 because the problem says the rancher gave up looking. So no, he didn't catch the horse. :lol::lol::lol: I love it. :D (and why do they say there's no other way to put it? They could have said Blah Blah horse ran XX miles. Blah blah rancher ran XX feet. Did he catch up with the horse?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmoira Posted November 20, 2008 Share Posted November 20, 2008 Yes, I contacted them through their "live help." The lady I conversed with said to just have dd do the problem as intended because there was no other way to word the problem that would convey the meaning they were looking for.This would infuriate me (generally, not at the helpdesk person). If I can reword the problem before I've had coffee, someone who is paid to do it should be able to do the same. :glare: A runaway horse galloped for three miles before it stopped. If the weary rancher had enough energy to walk 21,000 feet before giving up, could he catch the horse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.