Jump to content

Menu

Capitalism will eat democracy


Ausmumof3
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'll read it again later.  It struck me immdeiatly that what he said about ending wage labour was very much like what is advocated in Distributism, which essentially says that both capitalism and socialism make a similar error - they abstract real people, and indeed communities, from their labour and their land and the means of production.  In capitalism because it belongs to the capitalists, and in socialism because it belongs to the government.  Individuals and families, from this perspective, need to own the means of production which they personally depend on, and only in this way can there be economic stability and political empowerment.

 

One of the things that has been found in the kinds of co-op business structures is that for them to work well, it isn't just a matter of having workers as owners - there have to be ways to integrate the worker-owners with management.

 

However - I felt a bit as if there were quite a few missing elements.  Perhaps particularly questions about the viability of growth in the economy at all.

 

Edited by Bluegoat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll read it again later. It struck me immdeiatly that what he said about ending wage labour was very much like what is advocated in Distributism, which essentially says that both capitalism and socialism make a similar error - they abstract real people, and indeed communities, from their labour and their land and the means of production. In capitalism because it belongs to the capitalists, and in socialism because it belongs to the government. Individuals and families, from this perspective, need to own the means of production which they personally depend on, and only in this way can there be economic stability and political empowerment.

 

One of the things that has been found in the kinds of co-op business structures is that for them to work well, it isn't just a matter of having workers as owners - there have to be ways to integrate the worker-owners with management.

 

However - I felt a bit as if there were quite a few missing elements. Perhaps particularly questions about the viability of growth in the economy at all.

I kind of felt he did a good job of outlining the problems but the solution area was a little fuzzy. He seemed to be recommending a system where all the workers own the company but I could t figure out how it was going to work with retirement etc. if you can't own stuff unless you are working on it what happens when you stop working? Also how does the profit get distributed evenly and enough put back in? I'm not an economist either so it's a little over my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of felt he did a good job of outlining the problems but the solution area was a little fuzzy. He seemed to be recommending a system where all the workers own the company but I could t figure out how it was going to work with retirement etc. if you can't own stuff unless you are working on it what happens when you stop working? Also how does the profit get distributed evenly and enough put back in? I'm not an economist either so it's a little over my head.

 

 

I think what he was suggesting is cooperative ownership.  What usually happens is that the employees own shares in the company.  It can be quite simple in small business or quite complex in larger ones.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...