dragons in the flower bed Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 Domenico Rosa writes Although Lockhart decries the sterile formalism in which mathematics courses have been and continue to be taught, he makes absolutely no reference to the fact that the traditional mathematics curriculum was demolished by the excessive formalism and abstractions of the SMSG new math, as incorporated in the Houghton Mifflin series of books co-authored by Mary P. Dolciani. Lockhart's Lament I found in the comments of a Quiddity blog post. I wondered about this, too, actually, though it's perhaps a minor point missing from his large argument. What does the Hive make of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jane in NC Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 May I suggest that you read thread from last spring in which Lockhart's article was discussed? Best, Jane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragons in the flower bed Posted December 28, 2008 Author Share Posted December 28, 2008 Thank you Jane! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.