JoJosMom Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 from the people at IMACS. Why the Math Curriculum Makes No Sense The Wrong Way to Teach Math (a link within the first article) 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Another Lynn Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 I enjoyed reading those. Thank you for posting them! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monica_in_Switzerland Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 I wonder if we avoid some of this by using Singapore Math. Is there similar "math politics" in Singapore, or has the program been designed top-down by someone with good sense? Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part. :-D I do think all high schoolers need a basic statistics and basic accounting class, but think those should be in addition to "normal" math classes. As mentioned in the article's comments, the author could have chosen ANY subject, and show the constant battle between practicality, art, and expertise, political motives vs teacher's instincts, relevant now vs "classic" knowledge, etc. Really, there is no school system or curriculum that will be universally satisfying to onlookers... What is unfortunate is that the constant tug-of-war means that NOTHING is improved, they are just constantly ripped apart and rebuilt instead. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJosMom Posted March 3, 2016 Author Share Posted March 3, 2016 I enjoyed reading those. Thank you for posting them! You're welcome! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJosMom Posted March 3, 2016 Author Share Posted March 3, 2016 I wonder if we avoid some of this by using Singapore Math. Is there similar "math politics" in Singapore, or has the program been designed top-down by someone with good sense? Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part. :-D I do think all high schoolers need a basic statistics and basic accounting class, but think those should be in addition to "normal" math classes. As mentioned in the article's comments, the author could have chosen ANY subject, and show the constant battle between practicality, art, and expertise, political motives vs teacher's instincts, relevant now vs "classic" knowledge, etc. Really, there is no school system or curriculum that will be universally satisfying to onlookers... What is unfortunate is that the constant tug-of-war means that NOTHING is improved, they are just constantly ripped apart and rebuilt instead. I completely agree with the bolded. The first part is, I suspect, an inevitable consequence of insisting on one-size-fits-all schooling. The end result for me is a return to a state of gratitude that I am able to homeschool; my DD would not be well-served in a standard public school. (And sometimes it's nice-and necessary-to be reminded, at least around here.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.