Jump to content

Menu

Are proofs necessary in Algebra I


Recommended Posts

I am comparing four Algebra I textbooks for my ds for this school year (Foerster's, Lial's, Prentice Hall, and McDougal Littell).  I was going down a CYT Mathematics Sequence Checklist that was suggested on this forum in another thread and I noticed that "proofs" are mentioned in a few places in this checklist. 

 

For instance:  "use number properties in proofs," "prove theorems related to slope, and "prove theorems involving multiplication and division."

 

I can't find the word "proof" in the index of Foerster's or Lial's.  Are proofs necessary?  Could it be listed as something else in the index?

 

Thanks,
Melissa

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you find them in the other two indices? It'd be very rare for an Algebra 1 course to include much in the way of proofs (and frankly, I think that they should be at least demonstrated and problems assigned to the more able students), but Foerster's is an excellent course and Lial's is also very solid. Your child will not suffer in more advanced courses for having worked out of these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proofs can help students to really "get" the basic properties of numbers. While I wouldn't say algebra 1 proofs are essential, I would say that they can be VERY helpful for students, especially more able ones. The Houghton-Mifflin Algebra 1 texts by Dolciani incorporate proofs very effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've commented on this before: real proofs don't necessarily spring out and look like what moms expect them to look like. Singapore's NEM program endeavors to show students why things work the way they do in their math books. Never do they have two column proofs or even use the proof word. But the process is there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lial shows the 'proof' (rule used) next to each step in the text examples.  Students are NOT required to explain the proof.  Most Algebra 1 level students are just not there mentally--but they can still LEARN basic Algebra and they can see how it relates to arithemetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, proofs are necessary. But they don't look like what you are thinking.

  • A "proof" answers the question, "How do you know?"

Therefore, when your student is working through a problem, periodically stop and ask about a step, or about the problem as a whole. "How do you know you can do that? How do you know that's what will happen? How do you know this is true?"

 

When he answers (or at least, when he gives any answer other than "Because that's what the book says"), he is giving an informal proof. Informal proofs are the best kind. Trying to be too formal tends to bypass a student's common sense.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...