Jump to content

Menu

MUS Algebra 1 - using LCM to eliminate fractions


Recommended Posts

We are on Lesson 6 of MUS Algebra 1...

 

Part of the review was using LCM to eliminate fractions and then solve for the unknown.

 

My daughter is just NOT getting "why" one would do this. My question is: is there any reason to teach this?? I've been looking through other math curriculum I have in the house (A Beka and Saxon) and I do not find where either program teaches this. :confused:

 

FWIW, she did show her work and got the correct answer. (she determined common denominators for the 3 fractions and then solved.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the text.

 

If you're talking about solving linear equations that have fractions, the idea behind clearing the fractions is that then you get an equation that is generally much easier to solve.

 

See here for an example - last example on the page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the text.

 

If you're talking about solving linear equations that have fractions, the idea behind clearing the fractions is that then you get an equation that is generally much easier to solve.

 

See here for an example - last example on the page.

 

Yep, this is it. Fractions are an easy way to make a mistake. He is teaching the option of eliminating them to make potentially complicated problems easy. My ds thought it was useless and annoying until he made a couple of fraction mistakes. Then he decided it was useful after all. I think it is worthwhile to know how to do it and why you might want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got out our books to try to find the trail of where this was first taught since it is in review by lesson 6. Found it on pages 38 (for fractions) and 40 (for decimals) of the student book. I'm thinking he did a few on the video, too.

 

This is a method for simplifying "some" equations. I do think it can be helpful to eliminate the fractions and decimals before solving for the unknown. It is not absolutely necessary to use this at this point in the course. I have done MUS starting with Alpha, though, and I will tell you that it is HIGHLY likely that this method WILL be necessary further on.

 

I have found that Steve very often introduces things early, while they seem simple to understand. I can tell you stories from each level where I thought, certainly they don't have to do it this way, certainly they don't have to do so many! But later, was I ever thankful to see that he had prepared my students well for what was coming down the road. I have come to trust him and just do what he says. :)

 

I would teach it and make sure she knows how to do the simplifying using LCMs for both fractions and decimals. You can go back to the problems from 3C & 3D as a review. As long as you believe she has mastered the method, you can move on.

 

Blessings,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies... :)

 

*I* get why they would teach it, but I can't seem to convey to *her* in a way that her light bulb goes on...:001_huh:

 

She just keeps saying, "But I got the correct answer."

 

I really want her to understand this -- and I have to say that she is a really bright kid. She is one that WANTS to understand why, but this particular concept just isn't clicking.

 

I think I need some chocolate...and it's snowing here today so a trip to the store is out of the question. :banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you showed her a problem that's more complicated? Like the one in the link I gave?

 

If you're doing a problem like 2/3 x = 12, then multiplying by 3 rather than by 3/2 is silly overall. Same with x + 1/4 = 1/3... subtract 1/4; don't multiply by 12 first.

 

Acknowledging that it's a silly way to do the problem on ones that are this simple but showing that it's a technique that'll pay off later may get some understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you showed her a problem that's more complicated? Like the one in the link I gave?

 

If you're doing a problem like 2/3 x = 12, then multiplying by 3 rather than by 3/2 is silly overall. Same with x + 1/4 = 1/3... subtract 1/4; don't multiply by 12 first.

 

Acknowledging that it's a silly way to do the problem on ones that are this simple but showing that it's a technique that'll pay off later may get some understanding.

 

Yes...in fact that problem is VERY similar to the problem in her text. :)

 

Although, I like how they worded it better: ", I can first multiply through by the common denominator." (MUS teaches it "multiplying through by the LCM".)

 

I don't know...now her frustration is wearing off on me...maybe dh will take a whack at it tonight. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...