Jump to content

Menu

Amy M

Members
  • Posts

    1,030
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Amy M

  1. On 5/3/2020 at 8:16 PM, Momto6inIN said:

    Discussion is vital. V.I.T.A.L. Some of our best homeschool memories are our discussions about lit and history and economics and philosophy. Don't miss out on this wonderful opportunity to peek inside your teen's mind by hiring someone else to do the discussions! ❤

    Too many resources can make it a drudge. Pick a good one and do it in depth, don't try to do all the good ones at one time. SWB's is an excellent choice.

    I stopped closely correlating their lit selections with their history in high school. We did "ancients" but I didn't even try to match up reading The Odyssey with when we studied Homer. I just had a list of what we wanted to read that year and we read it.

    I forgot (it's been a while since I've been on these forums) how much I love these forums for the helpful and supportive advice! I've talked to homeschooling moms I know who are classical and all of them either use VP self-paced or hire a co-op teacher for the discussions. Maybe that's because they have several children, I thought, but then I see you have six. 🙂 Your response was both enlightening and freeing not to worry about matching up the lit so carefully or overbooking their schedules with every great curriculum out there. So did you as a mom plan a time for these discussions or did you just let them happen free-form at some point when you were checking their work? Sigh. I really want to do a great job at this! I know my husband will be great at discussions. I would like to be great myself at them, but I also know I have 5 kids to teach, the oldest needs vital discussions, while the youngest needs phonics... I'm trying to picture how I will do this practically speaking from day to day, hour by hour...😅

  2. On 5/3/2020 at 7:16 PM, SusanC said:

    We are just finishing up SWB's HotAW here. We did basically 3 chapters a week, answering the Comprehension questions and who, what, wheres for every chapter, then they picked one of the three chapters to do the Critical Thinking assignment for. It was great. The schedule kept us on track (with some wiggle room) and the study guide questions kicked off some good discussion of the history topics.

    For literature we read some selected Bible stories, the great abridged Gilgamesh that @Lori D. recommended, and then we did The Iliad, The Odyssey, and some selected Greek plays all in conjunction with the Dr. Vandiver lectures from Great Courses. More good discussion was had!

    Our focus is heavy on foreign language and very solid on math, science and writing. I like history and literature to be subjects that are "interesting" and "meaty" without becoming a chore. It can be tricky; the Iliad has a lot of chapters about fighting and a lot of emphasis on formal introductions - which was the fashion of the time but, I was told, rather repetitive. Also, Homer's use of delay as a story-telling tactic was not equally appreciated by everyone in our audience. 😂

    Thank you so much for your input! That will help me be a little more realistic, hopefully! About HOTAW, did you use the maps? And did you discuss every day that they read, or just once a week for a history check-up and discussion? I'm wondering how much independence to expect of my 9th grader as well, such as grading his own history answers, or how much I should be checking up with him and talking about what he's reading (especially if I'm not reading it myself...)

  3. I need some help planning history/lit for next year with my first high schooler! (Yes, I'm a little terrified about navigating high school. 🙈)

    I own too many products to choose from. (*See below for a list of what I have to wade through, weed out, and work into a schedule.)

    One question: How important are Socratic discussions in history and/or lit? Like, how much time do you spend working with your high schooler on history/lit or discussing with them? OR Do you find it worth it to pay for online programs that do this (like for Veritas)?

    Two: I think I'm leaning towards using Romans Roads Old Western Culture with SWB's HOTAW. How much is too much? Should I not use all of Bauer's book? And finally, has anyone made a schedule for where to begin and how to align RR OWC Greeks with HOTAW?

    Thank you for ANY advice you can offer!

     

    *

    What I have:

    History:

    Old Western Culture Greeks, Romans, Christendom, Early Moderns

    Tapestry of Grace years 1-2

    Picturesque Tale of Progress (goes through Explorers)

    Mystery of History vol. 1-2

    History of the Ancient World by Bauer (vol. 1) + study guide

    Generations History of the World workbook + Preparing the World for Jesus (only part 1) world history

    TimeLife set: Cradle of Civilization, Ancient Egypt, Historic India, Ancient China, Classical Greece, Imperial Rome, Ancient America, Age of Faith, Early Islam, Age of Kings, Renaissance, Age of Exploration, Age of Enlightenment, African Kingdoms, Rise of Russia

    PIG Guide to Western Civilization

    Kingfisher Illustrated History of the World

    Genevieve Foster: World of Augustus Caesar, Columbus and Sons, Capt. John Smith, George Washington

    Landmarks

     

    Literature:

    TOG yrs 1-2

    Resources:

    ·       Center for Lit’s stuff—Teaching the Classics

    ·       Well-Educated Mind

    ·       How to Read a Book

    ·       Invitation to the Classics

    ·       Understanding Fiction

    ·       PIG guide to English & American Literature

    ·       Progeny Press Guides Hiding Place and PDF Scarlet Letter

    Stobaugh World Literature and Skills for Rhetoric

    Old Western Culture

    Generations Great Christian Classics Vol. 1

  4. On 6/27/2019 at 12:33 AM, fourisenough said:

    https://www.amazon.com/Core-Teaching-Foundations-Classical-Education/dp/023010035X/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?keywords=the+core+leigh+bortins&qid=1561587529&s=gateway&sprefix=leigh+birtins&sr=8-1

    I have no idea where my reply went, but I’ll try again. Apologies if it shows up as a duplicate. 

    The concept comes from Leigh Bortins’ book The Core (linked above). The goal is to develop a strong mental map of the world. We use a YouTube video to get started. I’ll paste link here:

     

     

    Ah, yes, sorry, I knew about that. I thought you had a curriculum for it. 🙂

  5. Yup, we're also using R&S. We usually just read the writing lessons in it or skip them. I've found the grammar in CW to be more challenging than what we're doing in R&S (which, if you know R&S, makes CW seem really over the top). So, we cut, skip, or do together the parsing parts. It is helpful to do some of the parsing in CW, however, for help with the sentence shuffling work. 

    • Thanks 1
  6. We are 2/3 through our 6th grade year, and he's using: 

    MFW Exploration to 1850

    R&S 6 grammar, Classical Writing Homer B, Megawords, literature that goes with history

    MUS Pre-algebra, and I expect he'll be starting Algebra 1 before the end of the year

    plus piano and trumpet lessons

    • Like 1
  7. ETA: I am told it is my honor to say BOOYA now. I truly feel honored.

     

    Wow! This thread is a commitment! I posted only 7 hours ago, and already it's onto the next page with comments.

     

    Hi!

    We are not easily annoyed! :)

    Do you have a favorite determinate or indeterminate variety of tomato plant?

     

    Hope you're not annoyed if I say I have not idea what that is. :laugh: However, I live in South Africa, and over here the most common variety of tomato is called a "jam" tomato, and some people actually do make jam with it. Someone gave me a jar once. Do you have jam tomatoes in America? I am American, and my mom does grow tomatoes every year in her garden, but I don't remember ever hearing of these. They are not round, more oblong and oval.

     

    Yes, though I've only had it for a month. A Meyer Lemon tree. It's still in the 8" pot it came in. Lots of flowers lately, but I am guessing it will want a bigger pot and a lot more sun to produce fruit. There is one little green lemon that was on it when it came but I don't expect it to survive. Maybe it will hang on! The little lemon that could!

     

    "A. Meyer" Lemon tree. I didn't know there was a lemon tree named after me. :) When life gives you lemons...

     

    Welcome!  Stamp away.  

     

    And hey, you get 50,000 points just because we match.  10, 8, 6, 5, and toddler here too.  (Well, if 3 counts as a toddler, which I say it does because we are still working on the whole housebroken thing.)

     

    The 2 boys are the bookends for us, girls in the middle.  

     

     

     

     

    ETA:  I have to update my siggy.  And do the to-do things.   I'll start by updating cuz it's funner.

     

    ETA again:  Oops.  My 6 has been 7, and for quite a while, it would seem.  It only took me a couple hours to realize my error, though.  Not half bad, considering. :leaving:

     

    Don't worry.  You can still keep your points .  :laugh:   

     

    You get 50,000 points for making me laugh. Thanks!

    • Like 15
  8. I'd say to think about it the way grammar is learned via the classical method. That is, you build a strong foundation. In the case of classical piano, the building blocks are site reading, theory, and ear training.

    Suzuki is a good method for ear training, but poor for producing good sight readers without supplementation. In my 20 years of teaching piano, I've seen many more students struggle with sight reading than ear training, so I usually focus more on that particular aspect (sight reading) first. Learning to read music is very important, so I pick a method (any method) or curriculum that focuses on that as well as other aspects of theory.

    After learning to read music, I focus on how the language of music is put together, i.e. chords, keys, harmonies. I'd teach what each chord is and how to build it (probably using scales and arpeggios), then get a fake book (which has the melody written out with chord names for the purpose of improvising) and have the student improvise in addition to reading and learning new pieces. Classical music training has not changed all that much in the last couple hundred years (it has always included both sight reading and improvising), so most methods follow those guidelines. Suzuki is one exception that focuses much more strongly on ear training. 

    That was a long way to answer your question, so let me simplify: Any traditional method, in my opinion, will teach piano classically, because they have changed so little over the last few centuries. I use John Thompson for my older daughter and Hal Leonard for my Younger. I have used Faber in the past but it's not my favorite. I like to graduate to original compositions as quickly as possible, there are several publishers who put out books of original classical repertoire for all levels of ability, as I'm sure you know if you teach music (John Thompson is one, for each level of lesson book there is a Classical solos book of original pieces).

     

    Hope that helps!

     

    This.

     

    I also think of it like phonics. The classical method for reading would also be the traditional--learn phonics. Classical learning to read would shy away from the sight method. Similarly, I think Suzuki couldn't qualify as "classical," because as sight-method is to reading, so I feel Suzuki is to piano. My sons did take Suzuki violin, but I was teaching them piano with Alfred, which I feel emphasizes the chords well, so they were learning to read the music well. I don't have any Thompson books with me. I really don't like Suzuki for the piano. I know this is a caricature of their program, but it kind of seems like trained monkeys to me. They can play a limited repertoire very well, and that's it.

     

    I have taught with Faber, and I like it, but it seems a little more like creative writing to me, rather than simple copywork and dictation, if you understand my meaning. Faber will take that 5-finger pattern and put it all over the piano. It's interesting, but I agree, there is a more "free" or modern taste to it than some of the others, although it's still pretty traditional.

     

    My impression of classical instruction (which, none of our music would be truly classical, as even the scales we use are only from the last 500 years) is that it would be taught with a lot of technique practice. A lot of the classical composers wrote etudes and such for youngsters (usually girls) to practice with. Lots of scales, Beringer daily exercises, that kind of thing for the grammar stage. Perhaps the "logic" stage would continue with technique and sight reading skills, and add in more theory. Then the rhetoric stage may be using all of that to begin composing, arranging, or improvisation skills? Just a thought.

     

    But that's if you view classical education as "stages" of learning per Dorothy Sayers Lost Tools of Learning. If you consider the ancient views on education, you might be thinking about how to use music to instill the "good, true, and beautiful" into your children. So then the good might refer to playing well, working hard, having consistent character to practice; the true could perhaps refer to theory and sight reading and learning the "truth" of music (like 2+2 in math, learning the notes and staff and theory); the beautiful could refer to proper taste and judgment in playing with expression, beauty, and playing things that are aesthetically pleasing and uplifting, not simply appealing to the "belly," or the baser desires. What do you think?

  9. I have purchased only individual items that I needed to complete a package from them. Each individual item is listed with pricing and info underneath the package on the website, so you can pick what you need, but you'd need the TM. I wouldn't do 1st with MFW if you already have phonics, language arts, math, WWE planned. 1st grade covers mainly those things. In fact, I didn't do 1st with MFW for that reason, but am almost done with my third year using MFW for the "family cycle." (on week 33 of RTR) It would be easier to switch things out for the family cycle, depending on what you wanted to switch out. I did SCM's 106 Days of Creation for science in 1st grade, and I really liked that. It was very gentle. We read through a Bible, memorized some things, and did SOTW1 for history. Doing Adventures is also an interesting idea, so long as he doesn't mind writing.

  10. For mine, it ALWAYS worked to make them 'say' the sound as you write it, and when reading it say it out loud.  When they say the sound /b/ their lips make a line-- the line comes first.  When they say the sound /d/ their tongue is curved in their mouth-- the curve comes first.  Our boys never had a problem after that lesson.

     

     

    Pam

     

    This.

     

    I tried all sorts of methods. Someone here linked this site for me and I found this article on telling b from d. It is so absolutely wonderfully magically helpful that I printed it out and kept it with me to remind myself of how to do the lesson. I didn't actually need the reminder. Now I taught my younger two kids the last few years of preschool and kindergarten, right from the start, with this method. No looking at hands or beds or derrieres, or anything else. Just say the sound and notice what your lips are doing. Or vice-versa, when reading, if you run into a line, make your lips into a line; if you run into the ball first, make your lips rounded. Works for p and q as well, which my kids also struggled with!

    • Like 1
  11. I agree with the others. I think supplementation is a good idea to challenge him, but please don't leave MUS! Demme presents the lessons in a clear way, and the ideas progress logically, and I think it lays a great conceptual foundation. I tried supplementing with the following:

    BA, but it wasn't my favorite for my kid--might be perfect for yours, though.

    MEP--I've looked at it, but couldn't figure out how to wade my way through all the material and didn't want to go through the learning curve to figure out what to use and what to cut and what to print, etc. Free is very good though. :)

    MM--I only have the Blue series on .pdf, but honestly I don't think I do well with stuff I have to wade through, pick and choose, and print out. For some reason I don't get around to it. But I did take the time once for clocks, which a child was struggling with from MUS.

    SM--I go through the books after an MUS level as a review. My kids have flown through it. It's nice to present another way of looking at things, but usually, I feel that MUS's instruction was more thorough, and liked their set-up better. The only things my kids struggled with so far in SM (after going through MUS) was division, so we often skipped that and wait for MUS. I will use the Challenging Word Problems as a supplement, but probably ignore going through the whole level as a supplement now. It's overkill. Even the mental math isn't needed that much, since MUS does such a good job with the blocks and teaching the concepts.

    LOF--This is what I'm liking now as a supplement. After Epsilon, my son read fractions on his own, and after Zeta, Decimals/Percents. I think we'll keep going with that plan.

     

    For my more mathy kids, I plan to use MUS in the high school years as an intro to the topic, and then go through Foerster's or Jacob's Geometry. I really love MUS as a spine though, obviously! lol.

  12. We use LOF as a supplemental, fun review after Math-U-See. The K, L, M books are considered "intermediate." I believe the A-J books are grades 1-4 type arithmetic? Then middle school is Fractions, Decimals/Percents, and Pre-Algebra 0-2. I have Fractions and Decimals/Percents. We used these, respectively, after MUS Epsilon and Zeta. My son read them on his own and did the work. I only checked his work when he got to the "bridge." LOF helped him to think in different, more challenging ways about math, especially to read carefully on word problems. I would not use it in your situation except as a supplement, and even then I'd probably help her read it and figure out what they want. I think LOF would be hard for the teacher to use. I couldn't use it alone myself. It's not nearly "enough" for me--enough instruction or practice. I think MUS sounds wonderful for your daughter and would recommend that for her.

    • Like 2
  13. One more thought, now that we've started poetry. I felt the material in Homer was way more important than covering the poetry. Plus sometimes, I wanted him to write a paper for history, so I wouldn't make him work on Homer that day. Homer took longer than 4 days per week for us. It usually took my son more like 6 days to finish the lesson in Homer. So I don't think we'll have time to finish all of the Homer and Poetry in 5th-6th grades. If you are similar, you may want to keep chugging on Homer to make sure you get that done, and then just do whatever of the poetry you have time for. I am not going to buy Poetry B. I just purchased Poetry for older beginners, as it's a more condensed version, and that allows me to still cover the poetry, but also fit in the writing instruction I want to have time for that's more important.

    • Like 1
  14. Yes, I think SOTW and your encyclopedia will be enough supplementary reading. Any other suggestions I would make would fall into one of two categories: 1- other encyclopedic resources that cover a broad spectrum of topics, but would probably repeat a lot of what is already in your other planned resources. 2- more specific resources of the type that are on lots of book lists for certain topics, which you are already going to try to get at the library. So I think you've got it covered well. If you want ideas for older series of books that cover history well, take a look at Valerie's Living Library, I think it's called, which reviews lots of series that are nice for either a spine or supplemental resources.

×
×
  • Create New...