Jump to content

Menu

Grammar curriculum question: Going from ABeka to R&S


ereks mom
 Share

Recommended Posts

I teach R&S 6, 7, and 8 now in a private school, plus I supervised the transition of grades 2-10 to R & S several years ago.

 

R&S 6 (sixth grade) is not too demanding, but it does assume certain knowledge that Abeka does not teach, or teach thoroughly. So, I would start with R&S 5 to build solid understanding and confidence. Use this as a transition year, and if you finish early, just go on to R&S 6. :)

 

Hope this helps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I teach R&S 6, 7, and 8 now in a private school, plus I supervised the transition of grades 2-10 to R & S several years ago.

 

R&S 6 (sixth grade) is not too demanding, but it does assume certain knowledge that Abeka does not teach, or teach thoroughly. So, I would start with R&S 5 to build solid understanding and confidence. Use this as a transition year, and if you finish early, just go on to R&S 6. :)

 

Hope this helps!

 

:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R&S 6 (sixth grade) is not too demanding, but it does assume certain knowledge that Abeka does not teach, or teach thoroughly. So, I would start with R&S 5 to build solid understanding and confidence. Use this as a transition year, and if you finish early, just go on to R&S 6. :)

 

Hope this helps!

 

This was our experience, and if I could do it over I'd have gone back to R&S 5. Ds1 did Abeka through B and even started C but we kind of stalled out. Switched to R&S 6 and he had quite a tough time of it. The only positive was that he liked R&S a little more because he thought it explained concepts better than Abeka did.

 

Cinder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...he liked R&S a little more because he thought it explained concepts better than Abeka did.

 

 

I agree. I don't think Abeka explains things thoroughly at all. It's like they have a few lines of rules and expect you to get it. I look at Abeka now as supplementary, if anything, for that very reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think R&S 4 would be fine. The sequence begins to be more rigorous in R&S 6.

 

R&S is a great series of grammar books. Not only are the lessons thorough, the sentences used are excellent in content. Lots of truth is taught just in the sentences!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think R&S 4 would be fine. The sequence begins to be more rigorous in R&S 6.

 

R&S is a great series of grammar books. Not only are the lessons thorough, the sentences used are excellent in content. Lots of truth is taught just in the sentences!

 

:iagree: I also think starting at 4 would be fine. There is a noticeable jump between 5 and 6.

 

Cinder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...