included in the LA curricula by MCT, which explains the etiology of some words; it's just not very comprehensive. That's what I meant by "supplementing". I think maybe I chose my words incorrectly. I do not think that Latin is an aspect of grammar - I look at it as its own course, a part of her Core Education, which in my mind falls under the umbrella of "Language Arts", which includes vocabulary (both building and understanding), grammar, writing and sentence structure, etc.
She currently has a 7th grade vocabulary, according to her PS teacher; I think she's more at a 5th or 6th grade level, so she certainly has the propensity to grasp and understand Latin. Hence the question, though it was probably not worded right, as I mentioned above.
I totally concur with you about the need for Latin in school, as it will benefit her when college comes about, as well as in her desire to read everything that comes into our house, especially the classics.
I'm sorry if I offended - I think I was mainly trying to bounce some ideas around and see what others thought.
:)