Love Home
-
Posts
179 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Classifieds
Store
Posts posted by Love Home
-
-
I was thinking about buying a free-standing chalkboard/whiteboard. One side is a chalkboard and the other side is whiteboard. My husband thinks we should get the one that is a whiteboard on both sides b/c he thinks that the chalkboard would get chalkdust all over the place. Are they really that messy? I guess I just have fond memories of them from school and thoought that the chalkboard would be fun for my dd (and me :001_smile:) but since we will be using it in the living room I don't want a huge mess either.
-
My plan so far for third...
Bible Reading, Hymns
Math - R&S 3 or CLE (can't make up my mind!)
English - R&S 3
Writing - WWE2
Spelling - R&S 3
Handwriting - Handwriting Skills Simplified - Learning Cursive
Reading - R&S 3 and Veritas press book list
History - MOH
Science - Apologia Zoology 1
Home Economics - Pearables
-
Lisa, Thanks for your replies!
When your son switched to CLE, after R&S 6, what level did you place him in? Also, in R&S 3 and above did you have him write out all the problems? I’m concerned that might be a lot for my dd.
-
Thanks Lisa! :) We are using R&S 2 right now and I'm considering switching over to CLE. I know that R&S teaches the add/sub well I'm just wondering if CLE would teach mult/div well (I assume R&S will). Did R&S explain mult. and div. well to your dc? My dd sometimes has trouble at first understanding math concepts.
-
Anyone?
Has anyone used both with their dc and have an opinion on this? I would love the hear it! :001_smile:
-
I know both R&S and CLE Math have plenty of drill but, in your opinion, which one does a better job at *teaching* multiplication and division so that the child really understands the concepts? Thanks!
-
OP here - It was a hard decision but I finally decided upon R&S. FLL looks WONDERFUL but I think I will just stick with what I know (and is working). Now I better order it fast before I change my mind. :) Thanks everyone for your input!
-
Your welcome Fraidycat and Lea. Like you, I felt so much better when I found this out!!! This didn't have to be the hill I would die on. :001_smile:
Here's another HWT link:
-
I used to struggle greatly with my dd’s grip (she also holds the pencil like you described). It caused sooo much tears and frustration as I tried to correct it to the†tripod grip†b/c this was supposed to be the “correct†grip. Well it wasn’t working (even with the little rubber grippy things on the pencil)….it was just war after war and I finally came to realize that this doesn’t have to be the only correct grip. I happened to have the same grip she has and I have done just fine in my writing. I did some research and found that the tripod grip is not considered the only legitimate pencil grip but the†quadropod†grasp (the one you described) is also considered a standard and efficient grip.
See Handwriting Without Tears (they also recognize it as a legitamate, functional grip: http://www.hwtears.com/files/HoldOnYouHavetoTeachGrip.pdf
Here is a study shows that "the lateral quadrupod and four-finger pencil grips to be as functional as the dynamic tripod, lateral tripod, and dynamic quadrupod pencil grips."
-
Thank you all! Your input is very valuable! :001_smile:
-
The definitions and lists... I don't even have my son memorize the lists. He has memorized the definitions, but R&S has definition memorizing also, doesn't it? I seem to recall that being part of the TM oral review - going over definitions and other such things. I haven't pulled out a R&S TM in a while, so I could be remembering incorrectly. :)
I thought there were lists (like linking verbs) that the dc were to memorize in FLL. In R&S I don't recall the TM having dc memorize definitions.
-
My mama always said "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". If what you have is working then leave it :)
QUOTE]
That's what I was thinking but......maybe I'm suffering from the "grass is greener" syndrome. I just keep hearing how fun FLL is. R&S is not exactly fun. :) I also like the idea of my dd memorizing the definitions and lists. Even though I could implement that on my own using R&S I would prefer to have guidance and direction through that process. What to do, what to do. UH!
-
I'm having a hard time deciding on FLL 3 or R&S 3 for my rising third grader (now we are doing R&S 2 for second – doing it orally). R&S is going fine but FLL looks interesting and was I thinking about trying it next year. The thing that concerns me is that FLL 3’s scope seems much more intense than R&S3’s. Also, since my dd didn’t use FLL 1/2, there’s all those definitions and lists my dd would need to learn. My dd gets frustrated and confused very easily and needs something gentle. Which one do you think would be best for her?
-
Even many of those that can get interlibrary loans have to wait one to two months before the book comes in (that's the way it is for me). Very frustrating!
-
WWE doesn't expect original writing until the end of 4th grade, so how on earth can you judge how it's working for original writing after only using 1 and 2? :confused:
IMO, you really can't say whether WWE has "worked" until you finish the program, because it works on a set of skills with a specific goal in mind - writing down a summary narration by the end of 4th grade. We're in WWE2 right now, and he's only expected to take his narration from dictation, not do any original writing. So I would NOT expect any difference in his original writing yet - he isn't expected to DO any original writing yet!
So no, it's not going to help traditional-school-style writing (like writing paragraphs in first grade), because that's not the goal. What it will help is getting thoughts onto paper and summarizing content that has been read (which is different from CM style narration, as mentioned above).
To the OP: I highly recommend listening to SWB's lecture on teaching writing in the elementary years so you know exactly what the goal is. This is a program where your child might seem "behind" kids using other programs due to the lack of original writing, BUT once the program is completed, they will likely be better writers than the kids that just wrote and wrote and wrote and had no quality expected of them (as is common in the b&m schools these days). So it's comparing apples and oranges. You might also want to take a look at the WWS samples and the examples of students' work in WWS in the K-8 Writing forum, so you can see the actual results of the program. You won't see brilliant results in the early years of WWE because it's building a foundation rather than zooming ahead to style considerations. The philosophy is so different, that it's hard to compare it until you get to the end of the process. (and no, it's not for every kid - some kids don't need all the work on putting thoughts on paper because they were born with pencil in hand... if your child can already write down a summary narration on their own, this program isn't necessary anymore.)
Do you know where I could listen to the lectures? Are they online? Thanks!
-
No, not for my oldest. We used WWE1-WWE4 currently, week 30 of WWE4. My Winning with Writing came in the mail today, and I'm looking it over.
My son is almost 10, but he is 2E, gifted and special needs with ADHD/bipolar/dysgraphia. He adores the passages, loves reading them in WWE, usually asks for the full books the passages are based on to read in his spare time. His skill set in narration has always been good. He is at the same level in written narration as he was a couple years ago. His memory and understanding of the material is 100%. His writing alone is the problem. But then again he always has and probably always will struggle with organization of his thoughts with his ADHD, and his dysgraphia is a problem in and of itself.
For him, the FLL (we also used FLL1-4) and WWE combination just is not a good one. I like the program myself, and think it is sound. But it failed with this child. We left FLL4 (again week 27 or so) for R&S4. He is doing better with drill, drill and more drill, every day. He could fill out the exercises in FLL4 perfectly, but had no understanding of the concepts at all in another context. He could recite the definitions perfectly, but seemed to forget every single day anew what they meant. We are gaining some ground with R&S. Same with WWE unfortunately. He knows what they are asking about the passage and retains that info but cannot write, and certainly cannot write in other contexts, completely missing the points. Oral summaries were okay, written dismal. Writing in other contexts was beyond bad (if asked to write anything in a lab in science, other history context, other literature context).
Thanks for posting your experience. I wish that we could see ahead a time what would work/not work for our dc. I'm driving myself crazy picking out the curricula for next year!
-
Thanks for all the replies! I could see how it would be hard to evaluate how well WWE has worked out until one has completed the final level.
:iagree: I have to admit that I was getting frustrated while my son was doing WWE4 and hearing about fourth graders in our public school writing full essays. But now that he's 3/4 of the way through WWS, I am amazed at how well it is all coming together for him. We had our frustrations with WWE, but it seems to be worth it. I plan to use it for all my children.This is exactly what I was hoping to hear! I'm glad that it bore good fruit. I just need to hear some "success" stories to build my confidence in "the process". Thanks.
-
Are you asking about WWE or FLL?
Ooops...I meant WWE. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. :001_smile:
-
I'm planning on starting WWE this next school year (for thrid grade) but before I do I wanted to see other people's results. In the long-run, has it helped your dc's writing or was it a waste of time? Thanks!
-
disliked...
Teach your child to read in 100 EZ Lessons - it was torture!
History for Little Pilgrims
-
Thanks. I read that if you didn't use FLL1/2 that you should use a CD that came with FLL 2. Do I need this CD?
-
Thank you for the responses! I have a couple quesitons still. If dd has not done diagramming yet will it be a problem in FLL3? Also, I noticed that FLL3 has a workbook (unlike FF2) - could I still do most of it orally? We will also be adding in WWE, so would I just skip the writing/dictation part in FLL? Thanks!!
-
I'm thinking about switching from R&S English to FLL next school year for a needed change. We will probably go back to R&S English in a year or two. This year we are using R&S 2 so should I use FLL 2 or FLL 3 next year? I looked at the scope of FLL2 and there are many things that are covered that R&S 2 didn't cover. Does FLL 3 review well what was in FLL 2? I just don't want dc to be lost if we skip FLL 2 and go right to FLL 3. Any advice would help! :001_smile:
-
Last year I chose the first grade test for my first grader. I would choose the 4th grade level if I were you. There's no use frustrating our dc.
How messy are chalkboards?
in K-8 Curriculum Board
Posted
I didn't even think about dustless chalk. I've never tried it but if it really makes a big difference maybe I will get my chalkboard/whiteboard. :)