nutmeg Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 We are having trouble figuring out what to do with 'about ships': The first book on the shelf was about ships. According to the teacher's manual, 'about ships' is a prepositional phrase, modifying 'was'. I assume then we would term it an adverbial phrase, as it is modifying a verb? But as an adverbial phrase, it doesn't seem (to me) to be answering any of the adverb test questions: The first book on the shelf was how? about ships The first book on the shelf was when? about ships The first book on the shelf was where? about ships The first book on the shelf was why? about ships The first book on the shelf was to what degree? about ships None of those make sense to me. Help? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhondabee Posted May 13, 2008 Share Posted May 13, 2008 Oh, I agree it seems like it *should* be a "predicate adjective phrase" referring back to "what kind of book?". After all, it follows the linking verb "was". I even checked the additional adverb questions in R&S-7, and I don't think it really answers those, either. (How long, How much, In spite of what, Under what condition) In cases like these where the world doesn't seem to think I should have the final say, I would have to defer to the rule that says "adjective phrases always have to follow the noun they modify". Or, just say, "oh, whatever" and move on. not that that helps, but... Rhonda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzanne in ABQ Posted May 14, 2008 Share Posted May 14, 2008 I believe that the writer of Descriptive English Grammar agrees with you. On page 237, it reads, "The prepositional phrase immediately following the verb and used as a subjective complement should not be confused with the adverb phrase used as a modifier of the verb. If the verb is a copulative [linking] one, the prepositional phrase will be an attribute (subjective) complement. Often the adjective phrase can be tested by substituting a pure adjective. "Ex. The ring is of gold. "Of gold (equivalent to golden) is an adjective phrase used as a predicate adjective." It seems to me (Suzanne), that one could substitute a pure adjective like "nautical" into the sentence, to replace the phrase "about ships", and it would not change the structure or the intended meaning of the sentence. I would agree that the phrase is adjective, not adverbial. It modifies the book, not the verb "was". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nutmeg Posted May 14, 2008 Author Share Posted May 14, 2008 Thank you, Rhonda and Suzanne. That was very helpful! I can see, however, that I need to spend some time this summer doing R&S 7 myself before trying to teach it to my oldest. Up until this point I've done fine with it on the fly. :001_huh: Thanks again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beth in Central TX Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 I've been thinking about this more. How would you diagram this? I think there is an implied portion to this sentence. I'm going to simplify it to: The book was about ships. Really you're saying, the book was a book about ships. We just drop off the second reference to book because we know that's what we are talking about. Here's what I've come up with so far: book | was \ (book) .......................\ .........................\about ...........................\ships What do you think? Or would you just put "about ships" under the subject, book? I don't like it there because then the sentence looks like: The book about ships was. Any grammarians out there? Suzanne, my DEG doesn't address this; I don't have the same information on the page number you referred to. Does DEG have a diagram example? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhondabee Posted May 15, 2008 Share Posted May 15, 2008 I've been thinking about this more. How would you diagram this? I think there is an implied portion to this sentence. I'm going to simplify it to: The book was about ships. Really you're saying, the book was a book about ships. We just drop off the second reference to book because we know that's what we are talking about. Here's what I've come up with so far: book | was \ (book) .......................\ .........................\about ...........................\ships What do you think? Or would you just put "about ships" under the subject, book? I don't like it there because then the sentence looks like: The book about ships was. Any grammarians out there? Suzanne, my DEG doesn't address this; I don't have the same information on the page number you referred to. Does DEG have a diagram example? Thanks! We have just barely covered "elliptical" sentences in R&S-7, where part of the sentence is implied (if you saw Janice in NJ's video, you'll know what I mean), and before I even clicked on your post, that's exactly what I was thinking - (boat) in the Pred. Adj. position with about boats diagrammed as a prepositional phrase underneath. :iagree: Rhonda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.