Jump to content

Menu

Clarkd

Members
  • Posts

    354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Clarkd

  1. My two eldest have very different interest levels in math. One needs the ongoing spiral but also needs intense instruction on each topic. For her MM and Excel are complimentary with neither leading. For my other dd using the program, she is speeding ahead of grade level. I use Excel just to be sure she is retaining everything or if we are flying too fast through MM.

  2. Yes I use it and love it! PP is correct you don't need a teachers manual, at least for the younger grades. You need to provide brief instruction for the new skill then it is completely independent. We use it alongside MM. I'm not sure why it is so infrequently used. The only negative online review I found about it was that some folks didn't like that it is legal sized paper.

  3. We live in an 1851 farmhouse. We have lived here a bit over a decade. We've put on a new roof, some electric, some structural reinforcement, door hardware repair/replacements, removed an add on porch, etc.

    It is definitely the money pit. We totally love it. Yes, we frequently question our sanity. There are few closets. You can only put pictures on some walls. No duct work to the second floor for heat or ac.

    Thankfully there was no plumbing in the house until the mid 1990s (long story). So the plumbing is in good condition.

    Think long and hard about doing this.

  4. I approach it the opposite way as PP. I start the oldest with independent work (journal, math, etc.) and start with the youngest first for one on one time. I do it that way because I can spend so much time with the oldest on her language arts, if I work with her first then I short change the others. I work from youngest to oldest. By lunch time everyone has had individual time for language arts, fine motor, and math. In the afternoon kids have rest time or sustained silent reading. The oldests then rotate through individual Science. I am just starting history and will rotate that in the afternoon time while the youngest two play similar to science.

  5. Crimsonwife,

    The point of the current supreme court cases is that there isn't a currently accepted national legal definition of marriage.

    Your view within your religious or personal traditions is not the point of this national conversation regarding equal rights. Those traditions and your marital choices will be unaffected by this supreme court decision.

    To return to your comparison, declaring hatred and bigotry a religious right does not change it from bigotry and hatred.

×
×
  • Create New...