Jump to content

Menu

Syllieann

Members
  • Posts

    1,826
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Syllieann

  1. Dh and I, as well as the majority of my extended family, went into stem fields with traditional math. I even took linear algebra and matrices in college for a fun elective. I think kids that are really bent that way are going to be just fine with traditional math. In fact, I would venture to say that they don't need the explicit instruction in mental math strategies because they figure them out on their own anyway.

  2. I like chronological but I don't have strong feelings on 3, 4, or 5 yrs. I did have some concerns about retention, specifically those that Mrs. twain mentioned because I put a lot more weight on evidence-based than well-reasoned with a bit of anecdotal evidence. The cycle lends itself to homeschool though, while Hirsch's methods don't make it especially easy to fold in a sibling. This is why the memory work is important to me. Timeline and history sentences are regularly reviewed, not left in the dust for the next 3 years. I don't know how this will pan out in the long run since we're only in the first year. I would be interested in hearing results from those that did the memory work with the cycle vs those that just moved on to the next thing.

  3. K12 is a curriculum package that is used by some virtual public schools, but homeschoolers can purchase courses directly from them without enrolling in a public school (or any school). You then use it just like you would any resource.

     

    Here's a link: K12

     

    (scroll down to find their science courses)

     

    How can one view samples of the k12 program? Every time I try to find out more info I get a screen asking for my life story. I do not want them calling me.

  4. If you are open to Catholic resources, making music praying twice is really great. This is our 2nd yr using it. It is very much like kindermusik at home with religious content. Lesson plans give ideas but lots of flexibility and offer pointers for incorporating the songs into your daily routines. It should be usable without tweaking for Orthodox, but Protestant would require a little tweaking. The instruments you already have would be enough to get you started. The song booklets are not necessary. You just need the cd's and the parent manual.

    http://www.makingmusicprayingtwice.com

  5. I'll try!

     

    She would use Spaulding

    Easy grammar if necessary

    Saxon math

     

    And take a lot of field trips- doing school only 3-4 days per week

    I don't know what she would choose but I KNOW she would never stand for that spelling of Spalding. ;)

  6. Aar would probably work well for her. It is really easy on the teacher and everything is spelled out. Hardback readers are included. It's especially well suited for kids that are ready to read on the younger side because it doesn't include any writing.

     

    Progressive phonics requires that you read the books on screen or print them out. There are no books for purchase.

  7. I don't really care about cc. As others have said, they can choose to go above and beyond. Some of the pushback is more against the ideology of sameness rather than the actual content of cc aligned curricula.

     

    A couple of the curricula you listed would be high on my list if I was homeschooling 1 child. We use math mammoth and like it but I haven't tried make it real. We use bfsu for science. It is sort of my area of expertise so I don't really need the scripting of Nancy larson, but I am still drawn to it for the open and go factor. I really admire Hirsch's work but it just isn't set up to combine ages in a chronological cycle...not really a problem for 1 kid that may go back into ps though.

  8. I keep track in a spreadsheet. I like spreadsheets and I like numbers. It is nice to have an idea so I can just tell dh I plan to spend x over timeframe y. I also find it handy when people are considering homeschooling and want to know what it costs. I don't include most of the things that would be purchased anyway, such as fees for private sports. It is way, way less than sending one kid to private school, and a mediocre private school at that.

  9. Well, this does nothing to answer your question about which of those to choose but...

    If you are using exploration education, that is physical science, not physics. It is both physics and chemistry. From looking at the toc, it seems that following it with chemistry would be redundant. Maybe I am misunderstanding and you are just looking to supplement the chemistry portions?

  10. It doesn't really specify what grade levels this is for. It seems to suggest that the levels don't match up with grade levels, but since I can't see the samples, it's hard to tell. You seem to be saying that you're using levels 1 and 2 for a first grader, is that right?

    In the description on amazon or lulu, it says that the level is supposed to correspond to grade level.

×
×
  • Create New...