Jump to content

Menu

MrSmith

Members
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MrSmith

  1. A 4-year Bachelors degree will open more doors than a 2-year Associates (or perhaps it is that the 2yr will close the doors while a 4yr leaves them open?).  What certifications are being discussed?  I don't remember there being too many that will replace a 4 year degree, unless they are backed up with multiple years (2+) of real world experience.  With the job market being what it is, an employer will likely take a 4 yr over a 2 yr, so there may not be any experience to back up those certs.  Note also that the base starting salary will be higher for BS as a general rule.

     

    For a CS major there will be discrete math course requirements in addition to the usual Calculus (1,2,3, diff eq sometimes), so NT in high school is a good idea.  There's not a lot of C&P work unless you take them as electives.

     

    He used LOF for both Algebra's and MUS Geometry (also did honors lessons)   He isn't crazy about taking Pre-Calc but loves the look of the Aops Intro to counting and Probability.  He is by no means gifted in math but I do want to it to be somewhat of a challenge.

     

    *** His plans right now are a 2 year degree in computer programming along with some certifications...with the possibility of a 4 year degree as some point down the road if he finds it is necessary.

     

    I was reading that these courses are usually combined to make a credit? Would love some feedback/advice on this direction as I am not sure what the best choice might be.

     

    Thanks

    Debbie

     

  2. Yes, binoculars are easier for kids - but also - children's interests do change. Binoculars are a good initial investment. If it turns out that your child is still madly into astronomy in a few years time, investing in a telescope is more of a sure bet. Plus binoculars take up much less room.

     

    You can see cool stuff with binoculars. We looked at star clusters in the Milky Way last weekend through binoculars.

     

    Do you have any recommended specs for the binoculars?  Would a stand be needed?  Last time I tried using our binoculars it was very shaky and we could not really focus on anything.

  3. DS is doing Pre-A. I like the problems as they are interesting and provide a good challenge. However it takes forever to finish a chapter (6 weeks on average).

     

    DS seems to understand the material and gets most review and majority of challenge problems correct. My concern with skipping is I feel like that's shirking the program. Also I worry that skipping will cause issues with understanding in later years.

  4. regentrude,

     

    Thanks for the information.  I have Halliday so I'll just use that.

     

     

    There is not much difference between the books. Almost all the texts use the same sequence of topics (with Knight being a notable exception), the same problem solving strategies, pretty much the same examples. Either of those would be just fine. And they can be old, since none of the physics covered has changed in the last 50 years. Use whatever text you have available.

    Young&Freedman is particularly precise with the notation. Knight is well written. Halliday/Resnick is a classic that has been around for decades.

     

    Do you own these texts? Or would you need to acquire one? If you need one, I'll be happy to help out, pm me.

     

  5. Horsepower is not an issue unless he plans to tow things around. Other drivers will cut around as needed. Not sure where you live but CA doesn't have a Pass on the left only rule.

    Traffic wise a motorcycle is fastest (lane splitting is legal and can use carpool lanes). Otherwise any later model 4 cylinder car should be fine since the freeways are mostly a parking lot most of the time anyway, especially around the West side (UCLA).

     

  6. I'm thinking about Singapore for my middle child. He's my musical, artistic child. Will I regret this?

    I'm answering the question in your topic. I am a big fan of SM. My kid used it for several years. That said, I found SMK Standards Ed. a big waste of time. It was almost like K was written after 1-6 as an 'Oh wait there's a market for this book in the US. Let's slap our name on it and see what happens."

  7. What age is the child and what level of detail is needed?  These topics are complex and highly technical in nature.  There have literally been reams of pages written on these topics.

     

    If only a superficial overview is needed, you can probably just read the investopedia entry and distill for him.  A more in-depth analysis would require strong comprehension skills (all topics), facility with algebra (all topics) and statistics (stocks if dividends are being studied, otherwise just bonds).  Also a passing familiarity with basic economics might be useful as background for the fundamental analysis discussions.

     

    'Trading' is a very broad topic that could encompass just about anything related to financial markets.  Again an overview could be obtained via Google.

    • Like 1
  8. After the analyst years an MBA is needed for advancement to associate, and pedigree matters for b school admission.

     

    Don't know about undergrad and I don't know CMC either, but for MBA west coast grads have difficulty competing with east coast schools for some reason. Could be proximity,could be alum bias, etc.

    • Like 2
  9. The wall she is hitting is the mental math - she is being asked to solve 2 digit by 2 digit addition and subtraction in her head by using several smaller steps (strategy taught in MEP) and the mental manipulation of the numbers is difficult for her, probably in part due to the ADHD which makes it difficult to keep things in her head. But even writing out each step doesn't seem to help her. 

     

    I am wondering if I need to use something that has a lot of manipulatives?

     

    My kid is pretty good at math in general, but can't do mental math to save his life (what's 6 plus 9?  17! 14?).  I'm not familiar with MEP, but SM has mental math strategies throughout the lower levels.  He sucked at them.  Every time.  Finally I just let that go.  Years later, it has not hindered him one bit in his ability to learn and apply higher level math.

     

    Honestly I don't think it is that big a deal.  Yes it needs to be practiced and proficiency should be a goal, but I think as long as the child understands concepts and can correctly perform the necessary operations in some form (oral, mental, written, etc.) it will be fine.

  10. So for those who have invested the time in CWP, was it worth it for your kids? How did it pay off? Or was it not worth it?

     

    I searched old threads and was surprised by how many people only do the text and workbook and then move on. Do people really find them that simple and unimportant? I find the CWP books challenging. And I was an engineer who loved math. We are in CWP 5 now. Some are easy, some are tough. Some are just time consuming. I'm trying to get my kids in the habit of reading the problem, labeling info, and drawing pictures or writing equations. I don't just want the answer, I want the thought process. Am I overdoing it? I keep thinking it will be good habits for higher math, but maybe I'm just out of school too long.

     

    For my kid the CWP was definitely worth it.  The problems not only reinforced the idea that math is not simply a collection of isolated ideas, but also fostered in him a sense of committment and accomplishment that elementary word problems just didn't provide.  I'm also with you on the need to clearly show the thought process behind the answer.  We have a slogan: "No Work = No Points".  Now he is finally starting the see the value in organizing his work, and I am hoping it carries on throughout the higher levels.

    • Like 1
  11. So it appears that many people skip problems and don't do IP or CWP. My kids will 'get' stuff quickly, but I guess I pour on the problems for fluency instead of moving on. Also, I think the IP and CWP have such awesome problems to think out. They bring together so many of the concepts learned. Are people skipping these because they view them as too easy? Or because they just want to keep moving ahead?

     

    Having gone through the IP and CWP, I would not classify either book as 'too easy' (in the context of what the child is supposed to have learned up to that level; of course, if you are using Algebra for the L5/L6 CWP they are easy).

     

    I think the IP and CWP are integral parts of the program, and wouldn't dream of depriving my kid the satisfaction of cracking a really tough problem.  I especially loved those 'final review' parts of the IP.  Some of those questions in L5 and L6 were so hard!  Don't think my kid ever made an 80 on any exam.  I remember one time he made a  75 and was jumping up and down. :lol:

     

×
×
  • Create New...