I just looked at the new samples. I was surprised when you mentioned dropping the images from Usborne (because they were striking) but now I actually think it's much cleaner.

One note: I'm kind of a stickler for the way the term "myth" is used and it looks like your veering close to the "untrue story" sense of the meaning. Which isn't so good IMO.

What is the pervious reading that is being contrasted with Gilgamesh? in the instructions for SOTW: 53-58, The Story of Gilgamesh, that make Gilgamesh appear "untrue" and the other authentic?

You don't get into (I suppose) how many bible stories were lifted from Gilgamesh, do you?

It's really coming along nicely Carmen, thanks for sharing!