MamaBear Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I would like to get any feedback you may have if you have used the Learning Language Arts through Literature curriculum. We have used Rod and Staff for my 3rd grader this year for the 1st time and it is an excellant program but a bit boring. Thanks, Lynn H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AudreyTN Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 We love LLATL. I used most of the Blue Program with my dd when she was in K. We didn't do the red book, but started up with the Yellow book again. I've only looked at samples of Rod and Staff but LLATL seems more laid back in its approach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindaOz Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 Three of my dc are using LLATL. I really like the proram, and am liking it even more as they get to the higher levels - the book study my dd is doing in Green at the moment is excellent. I use LLATL in conjuction with another program. For example, last year one dd did LLATL three days, and Analytical Grammar on two days. This worked well and we still do the 3days/2days routine. They do two sections of a LLATL lesson on both Monday and Wednesday, and then the final section on Friday, with their grammar (or whatever else they are working on) on the days in between. This way they still complete a whole LLATL lesson each week. It is a really interesting program and I really like that everything is based in literature passages. HTH Linda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamaBear Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 Ladies, thanks so much for your replies. I am going to do some research on the LLATL program. I have a while before I need to make a decision as whether to change or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovemykids Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 you are thinking of using LLATL orange next year, I can *highly* recommend it! We started the orange program later in the year after GWG sort of flopped. I wish we had used it from the beginning of the year. We still do GWG here and there since we started it previously, and may continue into next year. The writing assignments are wonderful, varied, and fun. The actual grammar is a little behind other programs but it is all that is needed at this young age. I add a spelling program and other writing, as well as literature. I absolutely love the dictation excersises that are included. Overall, I think it's a strong program that needs a little extra oomph here and there depending on the strengths of your child. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AudreyTN Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Overall, I think it's a strong program that needs a little extra oomph here and there depending on the strengths of your child. Excellent explanation. :001_smile: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgilli3 Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 My children ( & I) enjoy LLATL. This year they are working through the purple book and tan book. I love how it is all put together: it's easy to follow and as another poster suggested you can easily add to it, depending on your child's strengths and weaknesses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penny Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 I have R&S 5 and LLATL the Tan book (theoretically year 6). I would never substitue LLATL for R&S. R&S is very thorough and the kids learn with R&S and can practice using LLATL (although many times we don't get around to it). I wish I had not bought LLATL and had saved the $$. I consider R&S to be like the parts to whole program (like phonics is to reading) and LLATL to be more of a whole to parts (like whole language). The big picture presented in LLATL is more fun, and less demanding, but I don't think my dc would learn nearly as much as they do in R&S. However, to some the details of grammar aren't that important. Maybe they are right! My children learned what a predicate nominative is this year. Somehow I made it through college with a good degree (albeit a science one) without ever knowing that! Blessings. Penny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiguirre Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 We've used LLATL Red and R&S English 2 this year. We're 2/3 of the way through Red and it's on break while we do WWE1, R&S 2 and Pathway readers. I like Penny's whole to parts and parts to whole analogy. That really puts it into perspective. My kids need to see things both ways to put it together. Ds needed both phonics and some sight word practice to take off in reading. R&S is great at the nuts and bolts, but not as good at applying what you know in a broader context. Ds really needs both, but for lots of kids that would be overkill. I will say that it's possible to do both LLATL and R&S at our level without burning anybody out. As we get into more advanced grades, I'm not sure that will be possible. I agree that LLATL is a bit sneaky. It looks so light but it manages to cover a lot of ground in an engaging way. It doesn't provide as much repetition as R&S, but you may not need that much repetition to get the job done. Now that we're using other rigorous materials, I have more appreciation for the LLATL approach. Ds actually knows quite a bit of what's covered in R&S and his narration skills did improve by using LLATL, too. We tried WWE in September and it was still too much, this go around has been very smooth in part because of the copywork and narration in LLATL. Good luck finding something you like! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.