Jump to content

Menu

Brain changes in teens who didn't do maths


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, bookbard said:

Hmmm, super interesting. I wonder if that's correlation or causation? I see they took some pains to distinguish but I'd want to know more. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn’t the inverse statement be more correct?  Math education into the early 20s for most people is a relatively  new development in human history so it would be more accurate to say that continuing math education causes certain brain changes?  Not that that’s a bad thing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ausmumof3 said:

Wouldn’t the inverse statement be more correct?  Math education into the early 20s for most people is a relatively  new development in human history so it would be more accurate to say that continuing math education causes certain brain changes?  Not that that’s a bad thing.

Yeah, that occurred to me too. Also I wondered if it was doing 'hard and new' stuff, so like if you started a new language, whether that would have a similar effect. But I'd have to look at the study rather than just the summary, lol. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's cool that they've found a specific chemical, but I don't think this sort of thing is surprising.  I'd expect that similar papers could be written for various neurotransmitters or 'activity in X part of the brain' associated with a lot of activities - pleasure reading, reading of dense material, foreign language, music, athletics, driving, etc.  There have been interesting studies on people who do 'The Knowledge of London', a hugh memory test for taxi drivers in London that people spend a year or more studying for - that amount of study changes the brain.  I think these studies are great for telling us what we are doing to our brains, but I am sometimes concerned that people will start to think that we need to force everybody to do all the things so that they have a 'properly developed' brain, when the reality is that most people can't do a ton of everything because being good at something takes a lot of time.  There is an argument to be made that if people can set themselves up for future success by doing a little bit of something every day then schools should require it, but I'm guessing that it takes more than just putting a math lesson in front of a 17yo - doing the work is what causes the change, and time spent doing math is time that isn't spent doing something else that affects another part of the brain.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...